Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-192268-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20240308121338.1983-1-yongsuyoo0215@gmail.com> <eda2a849-c23a-4624-85da-78a2fdef4fe9@web.de>
In-Reply-To: <eda2a849-c23a-4624-85da-78a2fdef4fe9@web.de>
From: YongSu Yoo <yongsuyoo0215@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 21:14:37 +0900
Message-ID: <CANXPkT5ggr8VbYdRy+uSnfHxDRES5arJJ8p+ist1CBTm-1xaUQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: dvb_ca_en50221: Add a returing EBUSY logic into CA_RESET
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org, Hyunwoo Kim <v4bel@theori.io>, 
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, 
	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>, YongSu Yoo <yongsuyoo0215@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Dear Markus Elfring

Initially, I sent this E-mail using the below command
"....git send-email --to  mchehab@kernel.org,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, xxxxxxxxxxx.patch. ..."

In response to what you suggested, is it OK if I use Gmail and attach
a new patch ?


2024=EB=85=84 5=EC=9B=94 28=EC=9D=BC (=ED=99=94) =EC=98=A4=ED=9B=84 2:38, M=
arkus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>=EB=8B=98=EC=9D=B4 =EC=9E=91=EC=84=B1:

>
> =E2=80=A6
> > For preventing this problem from happening, we make CA_RESET ioctl do
> > nothing and only return EBUSY if the ioctl is called during the
> > "transiting" states.
>
> Would you like to avoid any typos (in the summary phrase)?
>
> Regards,
> Markus