Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-192714-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.80.249;
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 18:02:52 +0200
From: Dragan Simic <dsimic@manjaro.org>
To: wens@csie.org
Cc: jernej.skrabec@gmail.com, samuel@sholland.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
 robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: allwinner: Add cache information to the SoC
 dtsi for H6
In-Reply-To: <CAGb2v64ETOtHxQf1D9n+c9bGivsRTC=O8swDru+2cX2UT=o0qw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <6a772756c2c677dbdaaab4a2c71a358d8e4b27e9.1714304058.git.dsimic@manjaro.org>
 <49abb93000078c692c48c0a65ff677893909361a.1714304071.git.dsimic@manjaro.org>
 <171691117471.681554.6744393893618279840.b4-ty@csie.org>
 <CAGb2v64ETOtHxQf1D9n+c9bGivsRTC=O8swDru+2cX2UT=o0qw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <803a939c62b3ac4ced7ac49f18efd723@manjaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Hello Chen-Yu,

On 2024-05-28 17:56, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 11:46 PM Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> wrote:
>> 
>> On Sun, 28 Apr 2024 13:40:36 +0200, Dragan Simic wrote:
>> > Add missing cache information to the Allwinner H6 SoC dtsi, to allow
>> > the userspace, which includes lscpu(1) that uses the virtual files provided
>> > by the kernel under the /sys/devices/system/cpu directory, to display the
>> > proper H6 cache information.
>> >
>> > Adding the cache information to the H6 SoC dtsi also makes the following
>> > warning message in the kernel log go away:
>> >
>> > [...]
>> 
>> Applied to sunxi/dt-for-6.11 in sunxi/linux.git, thanks!
>> 
>> [1/1] arm64: dts: allwinner: Add cache information to the SoC dtsi for 
>> H6
>>       https://git.kernel.org/sunxi/linux/c/c8240e4b0fd2
> 
> OK, that's weird. Somehow b4 thought this patch was v2 of the A64 patch 
> [1].
> Looks like they are threaded together because this patch has 
> "In-Reply-To".
> 
> Please avoid it in the future.

I'm sorry for that.  I noticed that back when I sent the patches to the
mailing list, but didn't want to make some noise about that.  The root
cause was some missing configuration for "git send-email", which 
resulted
in adding troublesome threading-related headers to the messages for the
individual .patch files that in fact were correctly created by running
"git format-patch".

Do I need to resend the patches?