Received: by 2002:a05:6500:1b8f:b0:1fa:5c73:8e2d with SMTP id df15csp102164lqb; Tue, 28 May 2024 09:56:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=2; AJvYcCXxcv1kxxuG42FfO9mls+y7Tt3WYeu03riLDBiMuiXQr9Su7Q8g61rcCdqvaCbx/8mRbcobHwP9/0PbP6xbHBnTUPVp7v55ox7MYzH7cA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGlZFJqto+u6wANZj2t5x+HxfJrWcUUD1tk+N3Jvijy91XrXluq0XVymAjDzRuoE0SRhQks X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:c4c6:b0:a59:c28a:7ec2 with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a62646ce06amr796831466b.41.1716915379187; Tue, 28 May 2024 09:56:19 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from am.mirrors.kernel.org (am.mirrors.kernel.org. [2604:1380:4601:e00::3]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a640c23a62f3a-a626cc6424fsi515490966b.509.2024.05.28.09.56.19 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 28 May 2024 09:56:19 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-192786-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::3; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@web.de header.s=s29768273 header.b=M3zXF7sY; arc=fail (body hash mismatch); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-192786-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-192786-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=fail (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=web.de Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by am.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBC9D1F248D4 for ; Tue, 28 May 2024 16:56:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A42FC174ED7; Tue, 28 May 2024 16:55:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=web.de header.i=markus.elfring@web.de header.b="M3zXF7sY" Received: from mout.web.de (mout.web.de [212.227.15.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D24C173320; Tue, 28 May 2024 16:55:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=212.227.15.4 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716915351; cv=none; b=TZWnI7BAOEY3crnaM3L1HyfR7gO6QIGMKz7ic0Q1yYhdjyi7zsBJpAYsha32w/o2iX1sMu/KqYxFi2iH1Yd3KKYvqw9fHBThCTWzKIbGXGco9xzz0vs5sDpixD1PaVfOBaJYYabeWWBI3Ub0zAIqfp0UJYMDHM2w4qmt/932b9Y= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716915351; c=relaxed/simple; bh=SLA6eZHc2BvDClBaKtUk96/I9vW/SG2jv7T2+rM/9UM=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=opYei56lz/GT2Nkt50DZseA18wx3cW1+8GAtpCMNk0VdJ75zNkB01Y3KRwNAoFtaUHr+2p8j0ZP+bPtkIISe34xND29210dlGyW6YgGspbiyp8XwoxKbBrPqHx/80y/TnSnTr7XffsJNFbVJ8Xe6tVr1F0iFSJdCHWhTKAoa7wY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=web.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=web.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=web.de header.i=markus.elfring@web.de header.b=M3zXF7sY; arc=none smtp.client-ip=212.227.15.4 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=web.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=web.de DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=web.de; s=s29768273; t=1716915336; x=1717520136; i=markus.elfring@web.de; bh=SLA6eZHc2BvDClBaKtUk96/I9vW/SG2jv7T2+rM/9UM=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc: References:From:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:cc:content-transfer-encoding: content-type:date:from:message-id:mime-version:reply-to:subject: to; b=M3zXF7sYSMvz/FIr/X99rNiBzhaNdX5l85aTETvdtocFHVVprpEfNBSUbjX14aJq oml54UH37UeG2BZ/P895FAzCUW2IeF0A2K2fQ0j+pszPLjaSCp19VjLg+ngM0ialZ 1vTs20qWzLnRZoPauP2vRffM/NrAZDWXR8UigFjU7BC6dOPopScQNYSHuey+ysI69 eeXWN+QxZfwkJE23LVUVK+ZicqNK2vxEHGchObdzPCPeISSfysTqaYt3DfeCdUDFI IhXOquKSGcrRdLSCJUZwxKocEfBG1lUROp/JFSNnjXz+iuOMK93L1Np5+qn+ariK5 uxqMbSstUIQMu8usuw== X-UI-Sender-Class: 814a7b36-bfc1-4dae-8640-3722d8ec6cd6 Received: from [192.168.178.21] ([94.31.83.95]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb006 [213.165.67.108]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MtPvm-1sULRO0Htu-00ukS7; Tue, 28 May 2024 18:55:36 +0200 Message-ID: Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 18:55:33 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: soundwire: fix usages of device_get_named_child_node() To: Vinod Koul , Pierre-Louis Bossart , Bard Liao , linux-sound@vger.kernel.org Cc: LKML , Bard Liao References: <20240528063533.26723-1-yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com> <0080bd18-58e1-4e82-96e0-e64d2fa978c9@web.de> <9d5f2625-f3e7-4212-8c9a-c22f137f39d9@linux.intel.com> Content-Language: en-GB From: Markus Elfring In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:vjbGgrgEO17m1KpRt/7p7h7JOKdIpmpH2ThC2hYA3V98P8mS0Iy M0+eEQR7Arl3USdjIJ1VHSYjEqf8184pgj02+3NySBhsxln140mm9lenTnZgAHtWUk0Q6gJ opBFhiH6StReB7hui3lCvO5lMIj4V3hCk0APCKT8hbLPFfea5WmUB9UfMA0lN/yo647bByq 2CfkdvqURX/yq0P6bzFDw== X-Spam-Flag: NO UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:Xb6ziLytc6M=;9oKgqGAL5OTGMkyxV4qJ57TE1OJ VggpzxFsAQOhxFMwZNJF8R1XM23cIlcXxxRsbjfk90eKWOSPmKyqkHsy58cgPZrjBOlfh5wc4 xHP+buP1BZBsJd96uyYBtGCScT4nC2LpOpD/Sw75lGs0atJsYekrFDWShx+EENw+3mJywLN2u OOLCQ9N4FE6zYwGPCTnFHjMYxz7JlC0DxXMQLrA3WgAW/MX9eDi6G6YYhY6hXbHg1DUq0GJcw cb/zVCStVi5URLs3fnka2dJ5ViVAhDx8Sk/RfUYZCBGiHv8Mx6bSFXJBR/5kzVZ/NWWWD5CM1 n81lB/F412qjmdbemh3kbhe/XJBOmGUNA+Zk9CuGRSz/RP0LDPsppSdxxMlaVbkzs0udfZWJP WnygWXKfPn13ve2TRin0tsc/XM3/BqdoyTB7NphcvE3A9VY24FTiDATQSHcWmSjQDfpMoGZlh D8dKTv7psXCANUuZaSjGvhF7QlzOvngMuDeJK9xYo6RouVZhyCKZgy4HDrJQ8E7xRBGfUPoGi jGMYLhxJNY9kPdV5G/pjPP3HOpbYW8yZjf770fqw/v+K5ud1K5d1lKhZBOoJ9MwiJIwP03D+7 9JBdtPQxazIfR7SPrU17No/dyOK6o5vW5lguC2X4y7/GnhlhI8orJQzyU/O42BUV+cqeJPrd+ Z4ogBhxQ8f4CKfl9hwv4HRl04g8k0RxV+X0nscksY2AxHv8OBC4ovJlqJiRJCUY7aYZDYfly/ UUa9ARnZ256Rj+qrXwzS2zAhizePD6D5ioObo5DSoa4ceQMn8nadzrM7GwYQnChmTyuqI3xic wX2gYGQmjNMfF/i6qESXXKjWtcmkkxQ9jQ+KvOO3drBUc= >>>>> Add fwnode_handle_put() to avoid leaked references. >>>> >>>> Are you going to respond also to my previous patch review >>>> in more constructive ways? >>>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/eb15ab0a-e416-4ae9-98bb-610fdc04492c@web= de/ >>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2024/4/29/493 >>> >>> Sorry about that, both Bard and I missed your comments. >> >> How could this happen? > > Becuase your emails go to dev/null for most of people! I am aware of some communication challenges. Is it interesting that my enquiry for this =E2=80=9CPATCH RESEND=E2=80=9D = triggered a constructive response finally? Regards, Markus