Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-192796-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) client-ip=139.178.88.99;
Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 12:13:56 -0500
From: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Cc: Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>, 
	Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>, Ilpo =?utf-8?B?SsOkcnZpbmVu?= <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>, 
	Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>, Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>, 
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>, 
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, 
	platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, 
	Nikita Travkin <nikita@trvn.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] arm64: dts: qcom: c630: Add Embedded Controller
 node
Message-ID: <njgvpbk4b26qs7zp675xdlmh3pcha6pm2vvvhyrxvrimtltgfx@slyweemaxmhs>
References: <20240527-yoga-ec-driver-v3-0-327a9851dad5@linaro.org>
 <20240527-yoga-ec-driver-v3-6-327a9851dad5@linaro.org>
 <bbsdvqjo2ikljnuvupolpdfstsaegfqyg2ct7bt24evcorcfjt@3fw5eicxxuik>
 <CAA8EJpr9i=+uJGqxeeVYKwJeMqzQFg6FvqnChKNQqXLLVcB66w@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAA8EJpr9i=+uJGqxeeVYKwJeMqzQFg6FvqnChKNQqXLLVcB66w@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 06:12:58PM GMT, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Tue, 28 May 2024 at 18:06, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 01:03:51PM GMT, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > > From: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
> >
> > Please align this with the S-o-b - feel free to use either form.
> 
> Ack. I'll check what went wrong.
> 
> >
> > >
> > > The Embedded Controller in the Lenovo Yoga C630 is accessible on &i2c1
> > > and provides battery and adapter status, as well as altmode
> > > notifications for the second USB Type-C port.
> > >
> > > Add a definition for the EC.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
> > > ---
> > >  .../boot/dts/qcom/sdm850-lenovo-yoga-c630.dts      | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 76 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm850-lenovo-yoga-c630.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm850-lenovo-yoga-c630.dts
> > > index 47dc42f6e936..d975f78eb3ab 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm850-lenovo-yoga-c630.dts
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm850-lenovo-yoga-c630.dts
> > > @@ -370,6 +370,66 @@ zap-shader {
> > >  &i2c1 {
> > >       status = "okay";
> > >       clock-frequency = <400000>;
> > > +
> > > +     embedded-controller@70 {
> > > +             compatible = "lenovo,yoga-c630-ec";
> > > +             reg = <0x70>;
> > > +
> > > +             interrupts-extended = <&tlmm 20 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > > +
> > > +             pinctrl-names = "default";
> > > +             pinctrl-0 = <&ec_int_state>;
> > > +
> > > +             #address-cells = <1>;
> > > +             #size-cells = <0>;
> > > +
> > > +             connector@0 {
> > > +                     compatible = "usb-c-connector";
> > > +                     reg = <0>;
> > > +                     power-role = "dual";
> > > +                     data-role = "host";
> >
> > I was under the impression that this port is wired directly to the SoC
> > and as such this would support data role switching as well.
> >
> > No concern with that, but just out of curiosity, is this not the case?
> 
> It is wired through the external Type-C port controller RTS5437, which
> also controls the vbus pins, etc. The UCSI firmware reports both ports
> as host-only and doesn't implement data role switching. So, having it
> as "host" is a safe bet.
> 

Thanks for the explanation, that makes sense.

> I must admit, I also hoped to be able to use this port in gadget mode,
> but it seems to be nearly impossible.
> 

Someone must have managed to use the device in peripheral mode to get
the firmware on there originally...just saying... ;)

Regards,
Bjorn