Received: by 2002:a05:6500:1b8f:b0:1fa:5c73:8e2d with SMTP id df15csp229451lqb; Tue, 28 May 2024 13:54:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=3; AJvYcCV2KhMaFsfcO+7ZqQHqxiiE3UvYcHUP+fPEOEGXIaYF4wL/dkBa6fwbT8GBkR1Crul/Hjr6oihpmVJaVaB4ZrQtLI0nM34LIm6B38TlmQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEbhpV5YMdyIr+hzl51e+pCkXfSQ8MfN7x2u3ATvdb6AWW5D35fyHIZkJaYA8PXpjJx8fPk X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:69e3:b0:2bd:e965:8193 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2bf5e16cd93mr12670994a91.9.1716929687535; Tue, 28 May 2024 13:54:47 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; t=1716929687; cv=pass; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=kJ6EroIGYsYCniLYTNTo+t0DWZ49uNWyqL1+vfJHgitD+Xm+tMhBlCpERy2XxWjJdU r7VsNT1dRVzUPcwUaaFg+LI6I1BXTJIrdD6rFFz1iep8U1Dm86fBphuNczAG6py2vBm4 dLXCsLNrO+P4kryeVMp115f5TaMV6w2SDVZQFZR4tH4egtGKkjmKqEVU1BAtHmR7jZL2 d+lUt/5OR6iYldSPMD7XB2oVag0TVE/7RWhOSPvEUZlJh0lCBaOg6KZnFf3vJ5mCDrm2 clcrd5AwNZQxFIkvqx1ZQnW6y1VORDQuyQYaURHPbNKrlxrfawe2D3sEKeact/xIB8T9 013g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:list-unsubscribe :list-subscribe:list-id:precedence:references:in-reply-to:message-id :date:subject:cc:to:from:dkim-signature; bh=33wz13A4f/caQiWBSVfYyeyVyNh/UQwJYekopJQjL5M=; fh=QUOYkrhvYyk//ZoGwHdb2m1c7vfsqYd5CGnq47wy3QU=; b=tNu77fSomjmy1GK4X4aiy8IqM0SvQx9JY3R4ux3rO9V4xHFv/RXirhxtsdQTxvsXL/ i0t4jHSnXiv1rRuWaQ8Ltnv4T+IIT5NJjaPtWlbRw1DYWO7bTAH79v21n4aMc9tKA4MX 5NpiOfKLjSxR92S8/DZW03UC6979lXc6rmnSaNd5ne3JH098R4D8r3JUnfBZB1XWY9AA YrhvrCsc+sdey47g7tonw4uB3MNxsY14UfeKdA+0ZmSBz8R3RapMjI4v3KLr+67H+85s T3z04T3eI+GtBzLmmDTPx828ByWXkNU++ZyMJtJNVbR+ctjfORtg6QE6pNHpZlMLVbeT RXsg==; dara=google.com ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linux.dev header.s=key1 header.b=ME5mJ+Jj; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=linux.dev dkim=pass dkdomain=linux.dev dmarc=pass fromdomain=linux.dev); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-193027-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.48.161 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-193027-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linux.dev Return-Path: Received: from sy.mirrors.kernel.org (sy.mirrors.kernel.org. [147.75.48.161]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 98e67ed59e1d1-2bffcf699fasi2545586a91.60.2024.05.28.13.54.46 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 28 May 2024 13:54:47 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-193027-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.48.161 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.48.161; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linux.dev header.s=key1 header.b=ME5mJ+Jj; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=linux.dev dkim=pass dkdomain=linux.dev dmarc=pass fromdomain=linux.dev); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-193027-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.48.161 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-193027-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linux.dev Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sy.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2161FB2969E for ; Tue, 28 May 2024 20:23:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DB0917966F; Tue, 28 May 2024 20:21:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="ME5mJ+Jj" Received: from out-180.mta1.migadu.com (out-180.mta1.migadu.com [95.215.58.180]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8986E17BB28 for ; Tue, 28 May 2024 20:21:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.180 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716927712; cv=none; b=sLuZUYfRxyiNVnCIQmQiKBGudgrWdXEqWNAYvw4K4X38+EtYedVQbPbE9YQhvKFFq3KBBk58ehRlsIjwsaFNJRHNan9CoUDiYQemRV4DDnnUMX5r3M0Rv1LB9jwKF+6OSEqTC7RCuIk7EdQrx3185Rc/3wepN9skjcrBg9gIkmU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716927712; c=relaxed/simple; bh=0Eqrk7wExNU/FBJHZLSwd9egy0PZStwjQ8OJauQdFG0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=iKExFBtnKMStE9wQcHVr/HaoUe5HGA1Kgsm5MIh3c5nabv7RTtdXf4doYNxTjSzJmPcABfngy0NB4VltIjsy8fjyStL/60Fe2qGOW/fGUzl6wMSKhHOloxKKWuEWPuaBcKylq+hU6FDUE1Y2hO4xzvdJL2Uwr5Tn9GY7ynhvGOk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=ME5mJ+Jj; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.180 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev X-Envelope-To: akpm@linux-foundation.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1716927708; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=33wz13A4f/caQiWBSVfYyeyVyNh/UQwJYekopJQjL5M=; b=ME5mJ+JjKpEoN6vLZzvzE2Myr1yywyib2bjtmdIwDIgFXJ6fRru8TAjkjs+Hzu7YOuZZ5V Au0i9HmXB4IXm1EgKmnlp5p0q0EhJCwNF1/XBoRUqSvLKeHhWz3gr9oQXXeGAlgqk3wqYb 0UFyXpNoh8TcncjyKWF+ReGUO8MG39M= X-Envelope-To: muchun.song@linux.dev X-Envelope-To: hannes@cmpxchg.org X-Envelope-To: mhocko@kernel.org X-Envelope-To: shakeel.butt@linux.dev X-Envelope-To: willy@infradead.org X-Envelope-To: linux-mm@kvack.org X-Envelope-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-Envelope-To: roman.gushchin@linux.dev X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Roman Gushchin To: Andrew Morton Cc: Muchun Song , Johannes Weiner , Michal Hocko , Shakeel Butt , Matthew Wilcox , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Roman Gushchin Subject: [PATCH v1 08/14] mm: memcg: move cgroup v1 oom handling code into memcontrol-v1.c Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 13:21:00 -0700 Message-ID: <20240528202101.3099300-9-roman.gushchin@linux.dev> In-Reply-To: <20240528202101.3099300-1-roman.gushchin@linux.dev> References: <20240528202101.3099300-1-roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT Cgroup v1 supports a complicated OOM handling in userspace mechanism, which is not supported by cgroup v2. Let's move the corresponding code into memcontrol-v1.c. Aside from mechanical code movement this patch introduces two new functions: memcg1_oom_prepare() and memcg1_oom_finish(). Those are implementing cgroup v1-specific parts of the common memcg OOM handling path. Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin --- mm/memcontrol-v1.c | 229 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- mm/memcontrol-v1.h | 3 +- mm/memcontrol.c | 216 +----------------------------------------- 3 files changed, 231 insertions(+), 217 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/memcontrol-v1.c b/mm/memcontrol-v1.c index 8b8c2c9516349..6188b33ba03db 100644 --- a/mm/memcontrol-v1.c +++ b/mm/memcontrol-v1.c @@ -110,7 +110,13 @@ struct mem_cgroup_event { struct work_struct remove; }; -extern spinlock_t memcg_oom_lock; +#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP +static struct lockdep_map memcg_oom_lock_dep_map = { + .name = "memcg_oom_lock", +}; +#endif + +DEFINE_SPINLOCK(memcg_oom_lock); static void __mem_cgroup_insert_exceeded(struct mem_cgroup_per_node *mz, struct mem_cgroup_tree_per_node *mctz, @@ -1469,7 +1475,7 @@ static int mem_cgroup_oom_notify_cb(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) return 0; } -void mem_cgroup_oom_notify(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) +static void mem_cgroup_oom_notify(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) { struct mem_cgroup *iter; @@ -1959,6 +1965,225 @@ void memcg1_css_offline(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) spin_unlock_irq(&memcg->event_list_lock); } +/* + * Check OOM-Killer is already running under our hierarchy. + * If someone is running, return false. + */ +static bool mem_cgroup_oom_trylock(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) +{ + struct mem_cgroup *iter, *failed = NULL; + + spin_lock(&memcg_oom_lock); + + for_each_mem_cgroup_tree(iter, memcg) { + if (iter->oom_lock) { + /* + * this subtree of our hierarchy is already locked + * so we cannot give a lock. + */ + failed = iter; + mem_cgroup_iter_break(memcg, iter); + break; + } else + iter->oom_lock = true; + } + + if (failed) { + /* + * OK, we failed to lock the whole subtree so we have + * to clean up what we set up to the failing subtree + */ + for_each_mem_cgroup_tree(iter, memcg) { + if (iter == failed) { + mem_cgroup_iter_break(memcg, iter); + break; + } + iter->oom_lock = false; + } + } else + mutex_acquire(&memcg_oom_lock_dep_map, 0, 1, _RET_IP_); + + spin_unlock(&memcg_oom_lock); + + return !failed; +} + +static void mem_cgroup_oom_unlock(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) +{ + struct mem_cgroup *iter; + + spin_lock(&memcg_oom_lock); + mutex_release(&memcg_oom_lock_dep_map, _RET_IP_); + for_each_mem_cgroup_tree(iter, memcg) + iter->oom_lock = false; + spin_unlock(&memcg_oom_lock); +} + +static void mem_cgroup_mark_under_oom(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) +{ + struct mem_cgroup *iter; + + spin_lock(&memcg_oom_lock); + for_each_mem_cgroup_tree(iter, memcg) + iter->under_oom++; + spin_unlock(&memcg_oom_lock); +} + +static void mem_cgroup_unmark_under_oom(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) +{ + struct mem_cgroup *iter; + + /* + * Be careful about under_oom underflows because a child memcg + * could have been added after mem_cgroup_mark_under_oom. + */ + spin_lock(&memcg_oom_lock); + for_each_mem_cgroup_tree(iter, memcg) + if (iter->under_oom > 0) + iter->under_oom--; + spin_unlock(&memcg_oom_lock); +} + +static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(memcg_oom_waitq); + +struct oom_wait_info { + struct mem_cgroup *memcg; + wait_queue_entry_t wait; +}; + +static int memcg_oom_wake_function(wait_queue_entry_t *wait, + unsigned mode, int sync, void *arg) +{ + struct mem_cgroup *wake_memcg = (struct mem_cgroup *)arg; + struct mem_cgroup *oom_wait_memcg; + struct oom_wait_info *oom_wait_info; + + oom_wait_info = container_of(wait, struct oom_wait_info, wait); + oom_wait_memcg = oom_wait_info->memcg; + + if (!mem_cgroup_is_descendant(wake_memcg, oom_wait_memcg) && + !mem_cgroup_is_descendant(oom_wait_memcg, wake_memcg)) + return 0; + return autoremove_wake_function(wait, mode, sync, arg); +} + +void memcg_oom_recover(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) +{ + /* + * For the following lockless ->under_oom test, the only required + * guarantee is that it must see the state asserted by an OOM when + * this function is called as a result of userland actions + * triggered by the notification of the OOM. This is trivially + * achieved by invoking mem_cgroup_mark_under_oom() before + * triggering notification. + */ + if (memcg && memcg->under_oom) + __wake_up(&memcg_oom_waitq, TASK_NORMAL, 0, memcg); +} + +/** + * mem_cgroup_oom_synchronize - complete memcg OOM handling + * @handle: actually kill/wait or just clean up the OOM state + * + * This has to be called at the end of a page fault if the memcg OOM + * handler was enabled. + * + * Memcg supports userspace OOM handling where failed allocations must + * sleep on a waitqueue until the userspace task resolves the + * situation. Sleeping directly in the charge context with all kinds + * of locks held is not a good idea, instead we remember an OOM state + * in the task and mem_cgroup_oom_synchronize() has to be called at + * the end of the page fault to complete the OOM handling. + * + * Returns %true if an ongoing memcg OOM situation was detected and + * completed, %false otherwise. + */ +bool mem_cgroup_oom_synchronize(bool handle) +{ + struct mem_cgroup *memcg = current->memcg_in_oom; + struct oom_wait_info owait; + bool locked; + + /* OOM is global, do not handle */ + if (!memcg) + return false; + + if (!handle) + goto cleanup; + + owait.memcg = memcg; + owait.wait.flags = 0; + owait.wait.func = memcg_oom_wake_function; + owait.wait.private = current; + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&owait.wait.entry); + + prepare_to_wait(&memcg_oom_waitq, &owait.wait, TASK_KILLABLE); + mem_cgroup_mark_under_oom(memcg); + + locked = mem_cgroup_oom_trylock(memcg); + + if (locked) + mem_cgroup_oom_notify(memcg); + + schedule(); + mem_cgroup_unmark_under_oom(memcg); + finish_wait(&memcg_oom_waitq, &owait.wait); + + if (locked) + mem_cgroup_oom_unlock(memcg); +cleanup: + current->memcg_in_oom = NULL; + css_put(&memcg->css); + return true; +} + + +bool memcg1_oom_prepare(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, bool *locked) +{ + /* + * We are in the middle of the charge context here, so we + * don't want to block when potentially sitting on a callstack + * that holds all kinds of filesystem and mm locks. + * + * cgroup1 allows disabling the OOM killer and waiting for outside + * handling until the charge can succeed; remember the context and put + * the task to sleep at the end of the page fault when all locks are + * released. + * + * On the other hand, in-kernel OOM killer allows for an async victim + * memory reclaim (oom_reaper) and that means that we are not solely + * relying on the oom victim to make a forward progress and we can + * invoke the oom killer here. + * + * Please note that mem_cgroup_out_of_memory might fail to find a + * victim and then we have to bail out from the charge path. + */ + if (READ_ONCE(memcg->oom_kill_disable)) { + if (current->in_user_fault) { + css_get(&memcg->css); + current->memcg_in_oom = memcg; + } + return false; + } + + mem_cgroup_mark_under_oom(memcg); + + *locked = mem_cgroup_oom_trylock(memcg); + + if (*locked) + mem_cgroup_oom_notify(memcg); + + mem_cgroup_unmark_under_oom(memcg); + + return true; +} + +void memcg1_oom_finish(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, bool locked) +{ + if (locked) + mem_cgroup_oom_unlock(memcg); +} + static int __init memcg1_init(void) { int node; diff --git a/mm/memcontrol-v1.h b/mm/memcontrol-v1.h index ef1b7037cbdcc..3de956b2422f1 100644 --- a/mm/memcontrol-v1.h +++ b/mm/memcontrol-v1.h @@ -87,9 +87,10 @@ enum res_type { bool mem_cgroup_event_ratelimit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, enum mem_cgroup_events_target target); unsigned long mem_cgroup_usage(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, bool swap); -void mem_cgroup_oom_notify(struct mem_cgroup *memcg); ssize_t memcg_write_event_control(struct kernfs_open_file *of, char *buf, size_t nbytes, loff_t off); +bool memcg1_oom_prepare(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, bool *locked); +void memcg1_oom_finish(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, bool locked); #endif /* __MM_MEMCONTROL_V1_H */ diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c index c14b1b01bcf53..3b088e0078821 100644 --- a/mm/memcontrol.c +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c @@ -1616,130 +1616,6 @@ static bool mem_cgroup_out_of_memory(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp_mask, return ret; } -#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP -static struct lockdep_map memcg_oom_lock_dep_map = { - .name = "memcg_oom_lock", -}; -#endif - -DEFINE_SPINLOCK(memcg_oom_lock); - -/* - * Check OOM-Killer is already running under our hierarchy. - * If someone is running, return false. - */ -static bool mem_cgroup_oom_trylock(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) -{ - struct mem_cgroup *iter, *failed = NULL; - - spin_lock(&memcg_oom_lock); - - for_each_mem_cgroup_tree(iter, memcg) { - if (iter->oom_lock) { - /* - * this subtree of our hierarchy is already locked - * so we cannot give a lock. - */ - failed = iter; - mem_cgroup_iter_break(memcg, iter); - break; - } else - iter->oom_lock = true; - } - - if (failed) { - /* - * OK, we failed to lock the whole subtree so we have - * to clean up what we set up to the failing subtree - */ - for_each_mem_cgroup_tree(iter, memcg) { - if (iter == failed) { - mem_cgroup_iter_break(memcg, iter); - break; - } - iter->oom_lock = false; - } - } else - mutex_acquire(&memcg_oom_lock_dep_map, 0, 1, _RET_IP_); - - spin_unlock(&memcg_oom_lock); - - return !failed; -} - -static void mem_cgroup_oom_unlock(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) -{ - struct mem_cgroup *iter; - - spin_lock(&memcg_oom_lock); - mutex_release(&memcg_oom_lock_dep_map, _RET_IP_); - for_each_mem_cgroup_tree(iter, memcg) - iter->oom_lock = false; - spin_unlock(&memcg_oom_lock); -} - -static void mem_cgroup_mark_under_oom(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) -{ - struct mem_cgroup *iter; - - spin_lock(&memcg_oom_lock); - for_each_mem_cgroup_tree(iter, memcg) - iter->under_oom++; - spin_unlock(&memcg_oom_lock); -} - -static void mem_cgroup_unmark_under_oom(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) -{ - struct mem_cgroup *iter; - - /* - * Be careful about under_oom underflows because a child memcg - * could have been added after mem_cgroup_mark_under_oom. - */ - spin_lock(&memcg_oom_lock); - for_each_mem_cgroup_tree(iter, memcg) - if (iter->under_oom > 0) - iter->under_oom--; - spin_unlock(&memcg_oom_lock); -} - -static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(memcg_oom_waitq); - -struct oom_wait_info { - struct mem_cgroup *memcg; - wait_queue_entry_t wait; -}; - -static int memcg_oom_wake_function(wait_queue_entry_t *wait, - unsigned mode, int sync, void *arg) -{ - struct mem_cgroup *wake_memcg = (struct mem_cgroup *)arg; - struct mem_cgroup *oom_wait_memcg; - struct oom_wait_info *oom_wait_info; - - oom_wait_info = container_of(wait, struct oom_wait_info, wait); - oom_wait_memcg = oom_wait_info->memcg; - - if (!mem_cgroup_is_descendant(wake_memcg, oom_wait_memcg) && - !mem_cgroup_is_descendant(oom_wait_memcg, wake_memcg)) - return 0; - return autoremove_wake_function(wait, mode, sync, arg); -} - -void memcg_oom_recover(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) -{ - /* - * For the following lockless ->under_oom test, the only required - * guarantee is that it must see the state asserted by an OOM when - * this function is called as a result of userland actions - * triggered by the notification of the OOM. This is trivially - * achieved by invoking mem_cgroup_mark_under_oom() before - * triggering notification. - */ - if (memcg && memcg->under_oom) - __wake_up(&memcg_oom_waitq, TASK_NORMAL, 0, memcg); -} - /* * Returns true if successfully killed one or more processes. Though in some * corner cases it can return true even without killing any process. @@ -1753,104 +1629,16 @@ static bool mem_cgroup_oom(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t mask, int order) memcg_memory_event(memcg, MEMCG_OOM); - /* - * We are in the middle of the charge context here, so we - * don't want to block when potentially sitting on a callstack - * that holds all kinds of filesystem and mm locks. - * - * cgroup1 allows disabling the OOM killer and waiting for outside - * handling until the charge can succeed; remember the context and put - * the task to sleep at the end of the page fault when all locks are - * released. - * - * On the other hand, in-kernel OOM killer allows for an async victim - * memory reclaim (oom_reaper) and that means that we are not solely - * relying on the oom victim to make a forward progress and we can - * invoke the oom killer here. - * - * Please note that mem_cgroup_out_of_memory might fail to find a - * victim and then we have to bail out from the charge path. - */ - if (READ_ONCE(memcg->oom_kill_disable)) { - if (current->in_user_fault) { - css_get(&memcg->css); - current->memcg_in_oom = memcg; - } + if (!memcg1_oom_prepare(memcg, &locked)) return false; - } - - mem_cgroup_mark_under_oom(memcg); - locked = mem_cgroup_oom_trylock(memcg); - - if (locked) - mem_cgroup_oom_notify(memcg); - - mem_cgroup_unmark_under_oom(memcg); ret = mem_cgroup_out_of_memory(memcg, mask, order); - if (locked) - mem_cgroup_oom_unlock(memcg); + memcg1_oom_finish(memcg, locked); return ret; } -/** - * mem_cgroup_oom_synchronize - complete memcg OOM handling - * @handle: actually kill/wait or just clean up the OOM state - * - * This has to be called at the end of a page fault if the memcg OOM - * handler was enabled. - * - * Memcg supports userspace OOM handling where failed allocations must - * sleep on a waitqueue until the userspace task resolves the - * situation. Sleeping directly in the charge context with all kinds - * of locks held is not a good idea, instead we remember an OOM state - * in the task and mem_cgroup_oom_synchronize() has to be called at - * the end of the page fault to complete the OOM handling. - * - * Returns %true if an ongoing memcg OOM situation was detected and - * completed, %false otherwise. - */ -bool mem_cgroup_oom_synchronize(bool handle) -{ - struct mem_cgroup *memcg = current->memcg_in_oom; - struct oom_wait_info owait; - bool locked; - - /* OOM is global, do not handle */ - if (!memcg) - return false; - - if (!handle) - goto cleanup; - - owait.memcg = memcg; - owait.wait.flags = 0; - owait.wait.func = memcg_oom_wake_function; - owait.wait.private = current; - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&owait.wait.entry); - - prepare_to_wait(&memcg_oom_waitq, &owait.wait, TASK_KILLABLE); - mem_cgroup_mark_under_oom(memcg); - - locked = mem_cgroup_oom_trylock(memcg); - - if (locked) - mem_cgroup_oom_notify(memcg); - - schedule(); - mem_cgroup_unmark_under_oom(memcg); - finish_wait(&memcg_oom_waitq, &owait.wait); - - if (locked) - mem_cgroup_oom_unlock(memcg); -cleanup: - current->memcg_in_oom = NULL; - css_put(&memcg->css); - return true; -} - /** * mem_cgroup_get_oom_group - get a memory cgroup to clean up after OOM * @victim: task to be killed by the OOM killer -- 2.45.1