Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932351AbYBCEov (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Feb 2008 23:44:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755341AbYBCEol (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Feb 2008 23:44:41 -0500 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:49926 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755005AbYBCEok (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Feb 2008 23:44:40 -0500 Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 05:44:28 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Gene Heskett Cc: Jeff Garzik , Chris Rankin , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, LKML Subject: Re: [BUG] 2.6.24 refuses to boot - ATA problem? Message-ID: <20080203044428.GA10139@elte.hu> References: <745427.71265.qm@web52907.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <47A51AD7.3070102@garzik.org> <200802022243.13710.gene.heskett@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200802022243.13710.gene.heskett@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2808 Lines: 66 * Gene Heskett wrote: > I think that one came from me, but it also gets over 14,000 hits on > google. > > Now Jeff, here is the strange part. That error was killing me, many > times an hour and eventually crashing completely, repeatedly. > > I applied that kernel argument acpi_use_timer_override once and have > not had the error since, and that includes one test of a full let it > cool for a minute powerdown reboot to see if it would come back, which > it did not. > > That argument causes the kernel to log this as its responding to that > command: > > [ 27.097095] ENABLING IO-APIC IRQs > [ 27.097287] ..TIMER: vector=0x31 apic1=0 pin1=2 apic2=-1 pin2=-1 > [ 27.107291] ..MP-BIOS bug: 8254 timer not connected to IO-APIC > [ 27.107343] ...trying to set up timer (IRQ0) through the 8259A ... failed. > [ 27.107346] ...trying to set up timer as Virtual Wire IRQ... failed. > [ 27.117353] ...trying to set up timer as ExtINT IRQ... works. > > The last 4 lines above are not logged without that argument. So my > theory ATM is that this forced the kernel to initialize something in > the boards registers that it does not initialize without that command, > and that its going fubar as shown in the msg quoted above is a totally > random thing, perhaps dependent on the phase of one of jupiters moons > as to what state it powers up in. And I got lucky, so far in that my > single powerdown reset didn't trigger it again... And you _know_ what > that knocking sound is by now. :) that's weird. Could you try the hack below and _remove_ the acpi_use_timer_override flag? The change should artificially cause the above 4 lines to appear again, in all cases. This would test the following aspects of your theory: is this unknown side-effect of the the acpi_use_timer_override flag related to the timer setup sequence in io_apic_32.c? If not, then the difference most likely lies in the different ACPI setup sequence. Ingo --- arch/x86/kernel/io_apic_32.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) Index: linux/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic_32.c =================================================================== --- linux.orig/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic_32.c +++ linux/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic_32.c @@ -2208,7 +2208,7 @@ static inline void __init check_timer(vo * Ok, does IRQ0 through the IOAPIC work? */ unmask_IO_APIC_irq(0); - if (timer_irq_works()) { + if (timer_irq_works() && 0) { if (nmi_watchdog == NMI_IO_APIC) { disable_8259A_irq(0); setup_nmi(); -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/