Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-193111-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1;
Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 14:19:29 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>
Cc: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>, tj@kernel.org, hughd@google.com,
 vbabka@suse.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] percpu_counter: add a cmpxchg-based _add_batch
 variant
Message-Id: <20240528141929.ba7e59e4cae89eec01631306@linux-foundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <ZlZFGmBiBE1VGQIt@snowbird>
References: <20240528204257.434817-1-mjguzik@gmail.com>
	<ZlZFGmBiBE1VGQIt@snowbird>
Precedence: bulk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Tue, 28 May 2024 13:56:58 -0700 Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org> wrote:

> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL(percpu_counter_add_batch);
> >  
> >  /*
> > -- 
> > 2.39.2
> > 
> 
> Andrew you picked up the __this_cpu_try_cmpxchg() patches. At this point
> you might as well pick up this too. The cpumask clean ups are likely
> going to give me trouble later this week when I rebase so I'll probably
> have to base my percpuh hotplug branch on your mm-unstable now.

Well, if it makes more sense to carry these in a different tree, let's
do that.