Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-193520-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
From: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>, Xiang Gao <gxxa03070307@gmail.com>
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org, senozhatsky@chromium.org,
 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, fengqi@xiaomi.com, xiaoa
 <gaoxiang19870307@163.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk: Increase PRINTK_PREFIX_MAX and the buf size in
 print_caller.
In-Reply-To: <ZlSewPTyQ-jMpW5n@pathway.suse.cz>
References: <20240527091929.316471-1-gxxa03070307@gmail.com>
 <ZlSewPTyQ-jMpW5n@pathway.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 08:39:25 +0206
Message-ID: <87y17tktze.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

On 2024-05-27, Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> wrote:
> If you need to modify the code to add the extra info, you could also
> modify the buffer size.

Exactly this. Your out-of-tree patch to add extra info should also make
the necessary changes to the buffer sizes. It is your out-of-tree patch
that is broken, not mainline Linux.

John Ogness