Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-193956-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.199.223;
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
Precedence: bulk
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.600.62\))
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] w1: Add missing newline and fix typos in
 w1_bus_master comment
From: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@toblux.com>
In-Reply-To: <38eae3e5-cb91-436f-a422-0d03d4c8cc95@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 12:29:57 +0200
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <C058E8F5-3F00-44FC-8294-93E0B767F13E@toblux.com>
References: <20240515101150.3289-2-thorsten.blum@toblux.com>
 <20240527092746.263038-2-thorsten.blum@toblux.com>
 <38eae3e5-cb91-436f-a422-0d03d4c8cc95@kernel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>

On 27. May 2024, at 13:49, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote:
> On 27/05/2024 11:27, Thorsten Blum wrote:
>> - Add missing newline before @return
>> - s/bytes/byte/
>> - s/handles/handle/
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@toblux.com>
> 
> Do not attach (thread) your patchsets to some other threads (unrelated
> or older versions). This buries them deep in the mailbox and might
> interfere with applying entire sets.
> 
> 
> Applying: w1: Add missing newline and fix typos in w1_bus_master comment
> Applying: w1: Add missing newline and fix typos in w1_bus_master comment
> Patch failed at 0002 w1: Add missing newline and fix typos in
> w1_bus_master comment
> When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
> If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
> To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".
> error: patch failed: include/linux/w1.h:85
> error: include/linux/w1.h: patch does not apply
> hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch

Hi Krzysztof,

just to clarify: do you want me to submit the patch again or did you run 
"git am --skip" to skip the identical, but threaded resend?

Thanks,
Thorsten