Received: by 2002:a05:6500:1b8f:b0:1fa:5c73:8e2d with SMTP id df15csp545632lqb; Wed, 29 May 2024 03:53:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=2; AJvYcCVZpux8oMawsUTl27sys1d1AReLuRAqQ1QQctBDjm8A94qyjQrDwHkHLjx/iChu1tw+3AyZvsjaR/qrRiz42TJjGWEjAB6+rlDSDWWq+A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE0gZ/uqZVPitOtF2mewnBAhLWzirbLorCzHE7aafjll5c0U20dJXWpbvGxWnsvhL1S449m X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:440c:b0:6f7:a45f:6df5 with SMTP id 46e09a7af769-6f8d0b40b91mr17965255a34.34.1716979987383; Wed, 29 May 2024 03:53:07 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from sy.mirrors.kernel.org (sy.mirrors.kernel.org. [2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d2e1a72fcca58-6f8fcfdee7bsi10005231b3a.221.2024.05.29.03.53.06 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 29 May 2024 03:53:07 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-193982-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; arc=fail (body hash mismatch); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-193982-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-193982-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sy.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83821B23C27 for ; Wed, 29 May 2024 10:52:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93AF717BB06; Wed, 29 May 2024 10:51:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5B0717B4E2; Wed, 29 May 2024 10:51:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716979917; cv=none; b=fN7KHUYDOho2rcFC1sMKvgGNhYA5YdsNisSeErvJsatW3HNHcONCLZLhneZvu+XlCUkPn1BKckIFZYi4cxIfWal3FuxJ57CWX46U0ptRAjhKa+6M+EhU6G86DmyAcz3Uv0y9XCdZq/qRljGNDysNnlTceyARHOpAikIIoD0PDjM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716979917; c=relaxed/simple; bh=hu2o7TrXLAGI3/sOnTzeqAdPmrb8I0AVR4eoXnAypvw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=eqtZ1qjqW6aa9OeZF0EF4gueGEOOw8NvaMmZIMx1HIfbJZMwNNP5PS+fH87XhOT9VFsWUacya0P9QYoZ4VM9mOmiZmpctVC0fNVRTRNCSq8oAHMx5lVyiBHoECJs7IyHt+kLQMme1X1k+6Bg3h631DnJ5nVr0cH1Q2cbuASxA8w= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64F72339; Wed, 29 May 2024 03:52:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from J2N7QTR9R3 (usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 22C433F792; Wed, 29 May 2024 03:51:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 11:51:40 +0100 From: Mark Rutland To: Anshuman Khandual Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, will@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, Mark Brown , James Clark , Rob Herring , Marc Zyngier , Suzuki Poulose , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet , Oliver Upton , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V17 4/9] arm64/boot: Enable EL2 requirements for BRBE Message-ID: References: <20240405024639.1179064-1-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> <20240405024639.1179064-5-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240405024639.1179064-5-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 08:16:34AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > Fine grained trap control for BRBE registers, and instructions access need > to be configured in HDFGRTR_EL2, HDFGWTR_EL2 and HFGITR_EL2 registers when > kernel enters at EL1 but EL2 is present. This changes __init_el2_fgt() as > required. > > Similarly cycle and mis-prediction capture need to be enabled in BRBCR_EL1 > and BRBCR_EL2 when the kernel enters either into EL1 or EL2. This adds new > __init_el2_brbe() to achieve this objective. > > This also updates Documentation/arch/arm64/booting.rst with all the above > EL2 along with MDRC_EL3.SBRBE requirements. > > First this replaces an existing hard encoding (1 << 62) with corresponding > applicable macro HDFGRTR_EL2_nPMSNEVFR_EL1_MASK. > > Cc: Catalin Marinas > Cc: Will Deacon > Cc: Jonathan Corbet > Cc: Marc Zyngier > Cc: Oliver Upton > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual > ---- > Changes in V17: > > - New patch added in the series > - Separated out from the BRBE driver implementation patch > - Dropped the comment in __init_el2_brbe() > - Updated __init_el2_brbe() with BRBCR_EL2.MPRED requirements > - Updated __init_el2_brbe() with __check_hvhe() constructs > - Updated booting.rst regarding MPRED, MDCR_EL3 and fine grained control > > Documentation/arch/arm64/booting.rst | 26 ++++++++ > arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h | 90 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > 2 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/arch/arm64/booting.rst b/Documentation/arch/arm64/booting.rst > index b57776a68f15..512210da7dd2 100644 > --- a/Documentation/arch/arm64/booting.rst > +++ b/Documentation/arch/arm64/booting.rst > @@ -349,6 +349,32 @@ Before jumping into the kernel, the following conditions must be met: > > - HWFGWTR_EL2.nSMPRI_EL1 (bit 54) must be initialised to 0b01. > > + For CPUs with feature Branch Record Buffer Extension (FEAT_BRBE): > + > + - If the kernel is entered at EL2 and EL1 is present: > + > + - BRBCR_EL1.CC (bit 3) must be initialised to 0b1. > + - BRBCR_EL1.MPRED (bit 4) must be initialised to 0b1. IIUC this isn't necessary; if the kernel is entered at EL2, it's capable of initializing the EL1 regs, and it doesn't look like this silently affects something we'd need in the absence of a BRBE driver. AFAICT the __init_el2_brbe() code you add below handles this, so I think this is redundant and can be deleted. > + - If the kernel is entered at EL1 and EL2 is present: > + > + - BRBCR_EL2.CC (bit 3) must be initialised to 0b1. > + - BRBCR_EL2.MPRED (bit 4) must be initialised to 0b1. > + > + - HDFGRTR_EL2.nBRBDATA (bit 61) must be initialised to 0b1. > + - HDFGRTR_EL2.nBRBCTL (bit 60) must be initialised to 0b1. > + - HDFGRTR_EL2.nBRBIDR (bit 59) must be initialised to 0b1. > + > + - HDFGWTR_EL2.nBRBDATA (bit 61) must be initialised to 0b1. > + - HDFGWTR_EL2.nBRBCTL (bit 60) must be initialised to 0b1. > + > + - HFGITR_EL2.nBRBIALL (bit 56) must be initialised to 0b1. > + - HFGITR_EL2.nBRBINJ (bit 55) must be initialised to 0b1. > + > + - If EL3 is present: > + > + - MDCR_EL3.SBRBE (bits 33:32) must be initialised to 0b11. Minor nit: please list the EL3 requirements first, that way this can be read in EL3->EL2->EL1 order to match the FW boot-flow order. > + > For CPUs with the Scalable Matrix Extension FA64 feature (FEAT_SME_FA64): > > - If EL3 is present: > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h > index b7afaa026842..7c12a8e658d4 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h > @@ -154,6 +154,41 @@ > .Lskip_set_cptr_\@: > .endm > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_BRBE > +/* > + * Enable BRBE cycle count and miss-prediction > + * > + * BRBE requires both BRBCR_EL1.CC and BRBCR_EL2.CC fields, be set > + * for the cycle counts to be available in BRBINF_EL1.CC during > + * branch record processing after a PMU interrupt. This enables CC > + * field on both these registers while still executing inside EL2. Huh, it's a bit of an oddity to do that for a register that gets the E2H treatment, but that is what the ARM ARM says, looking at the pseudocode in ARM DDI 0487K.a: | // BRBCycleCountingEnabled() | // ========================= | // Returns TRUE if the recording of cycle counts is allowed, | // FALSE otherwise. | boolean BRBCycleCountingEnabled() | if HaveEL(EL2) && BRBCR_EL2.CC == '0' then return FALSE; | if BRBCR_EL1.CC == '0' then return FALSE; | return TRUE; .. and likewise for MPRED: | // BRBEMispredictAllowed() | // ======================= | // Returns TRUE if the recording of branch misprediction is allowed, | // FALSE otherwise. | boolean BRBEMispredictAllowed() | if HaveEL(EL2) && BRBCR_EL2.MPRED == '0' then return FALSE; | if BRBCR_EL1.MPRED == '0' then return FALSE; | return TRUE; .. though BRBCycleCountingEnabled() isn't actually used anywhere, while BRBEMispredictAllowed is used by BRBEBranch(), since that does: | (ccu, cc) = BranchEncCycleCount(); | ... | bit mispredict = if BRBEMispredictAllowed() && BranchMispredict() then '1' else '0'; .. where BranchEncCycleCount() is a stub that doesn't mention BRBCycleCountingEnabled() at all, so it's not clear to me whether CCU is guaranteed to be set. > + * > + * BRBE driver would still be able to toggle branch records cycle > + * count support via BRBCR_EL1.CC field regardless of whether the > + * kernel ends up executing in EL1 or EL2. > + * > + * The same principle applies for branch record mis-prediction info > + * as well, thus requiring MPRED field to be set on both BRBCR_EL1 > + * and BRBCR_EL2 while still executing inside EL2. > + */ I think we can clarify this comment to: /* * Enable BRBE to record cycle counts and branch mispredicts. * * At any EL, to record cycle counts BRBE requires that both * BRBCR_EL2.CC=1 and BRBCR_EL1.CC=1. * * At any EL, to record branch mispredicts BRBE requires that both * BRBCR_EL2.MPRED=1 and BRBCR_EL1.MPRED=1. * * When HCR_EL2.E2H=1, the BRBCR_EL1 encoding is redirected to * BRBCR_EL2, but the {CC,MPRED} bits in the real BRBCR_EL1 register * still apply. * * Set {CC,MPRBED} in both BRBCR_EL2 and BRBCR_EL1 so that at runtime we * only need to enable/disable thse in BRBCR_EL1 regardless of whether * the kernel ends up executing in EL1 or EL2. */ > +.macro __init_el2_brbe > + mrs x1, id_aa64dfr0_el1 > + ubfx x1, x1, #ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_BRBE_SHIFT, #4 > + cbz x1, .Lskip_brbe_\@ > + > + mov_q x0, BRBCR_ELx_CC | BRBCR_ELx_MPRED > + msr_s SYS_BRBCR_EL2, x0 > + > + __check_hvhe .Lset_brbe_nvhe_\@, x1 > + msr_s SYS_BRBCR_EL12, x0 // VHE > + b .Lskip_brbe_\@ > + > +.Lset_brbe_nvhe_\@: > + msr_s SYS_BRBCR_EL1, x0 // NVHE > +.Lskip_brbe_\@: > +.endm > +#endif /* CONFIG_ARM64_BRBE */ > + > /* Disable any fine grained traps */ > .macro __init_el2_fgt > mrs x1, id_aa64mmfr0_el1 > @@ -161,16 +196,48 @@ > cbz x1, .Lskip_fgt_\@ > > mov x0, xzr > + mov x2, xzr > mrs x1, id_aa64dfr0_el1 > ubfx x1, x1, #ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMSVer_SHIFT, #4 > cmp x1, #3 > b.lt .Lset_debug_fgt_\@ > + > /* Disable PMSNEVFR_EL1 read and write traps */ > - orr x0, x0, #(1 << 62) > + orr x0, x0, #HDFGRTR_EL2_nPMSNEVFR_EL1_MASK > + orr x2, x2, #HDFGWTR_EL2_nPMSNEVFR_EL1_MASK > > .Lset_debug_fgt_\@: > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_BRBE > + mrs x1, id_aa64dfr0_el1 > + ubfx x1, x1, #ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_BRBE_SHIFT, #4 > + cbz x1, .Lskip_brbe_reg_fgt_\@ > + > + /* > + * Disable read traps for the following registers > + * > + * [BRBSRC|BRBTGT|RBINF]_EL1 > + * [BRBSRCINJ|BRBTGTINJ|BRBINFINJ|BRBTS]_EL1 > + */ > + orr x0, x0, #HDFGRTR_EL2_nBRBDATA_MASK > + > + /* > + * Disable write traps for the following registers > + * > + * [BRBSRCINJ|BRBTGTINJ|BRBINFINJ|BRBTS]_EL1 > + */ > + orr x2, x2, #HDFGWTR_EL2_nBRBDATA_MASK > + > + /* Disable read and write traps for [BRBCR|BRBFCR]_EL1 */ > + orr x0, x0, #HDFGRTR_EL2_nBRBCTL_MASK > + orr x2, x2, #HDFGWTR_EL2_nBRBCTL_MASK > + > + /* Disable read traps for BRBIDR_EL1 */ > + orr x0, x0, #HDFGRTR_EL2_nBRBIDR_MASK > + > +.Lskip_brbe_reg_fgt_\@: > +#endif /* CONFIG_ARM64_BRBE */ > msr_s SYS_HDFGRTR_EL2, x0 > - msr_s SYS_HDFGWTR_EL2, x0 > + msr_s SYS_HDFGWTR_EL2, x2 > > mov x0, xzr > mrs x1, id_aa64pfr1_el1 > @@ -193,7 +260,21 @@ > .Lset_fgt_\@: > msr_s SYS_HFGRTR_EL2, x0 > msr_s SYS_HFGWTR_EL2, x0 > - msr_s SYS_HFGITR_EL2, xzr > + mov x0, xzr > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_BRBE > + mrs x1, id_aa64dfr0_el1 > + ubfx x1, x1, #ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_BRBE_SHIFT, #4 > + cbz x1, .Lskip_brbe_insn_fgt_\@ > + > + /* Disable traps for BRBIALL instruction */ > + orr x0, x0, #HFGITR_EL2_nBRBIALL_MASK > + > + /* Disable traps for BRBINJ instruction */ > + orr x0, x0, #HFGITR_EL2_nBRBINJ_MASK > + > +.Lskip_brbe_insn_fgt_\@: > +#endif /* CONFIG_ARM64_BRBE */ > + msr_s SYS_HFGITR_EL2, x0 > > mrs x1, id_aa64pfr0_el1 // AMU traps UNDEF without AMU > ubfx x1, x1, #ID_AA64PFR0_EL1_AMU_SHIFT, #4 > @@ -228,6 +309,9 @@ > __init_el2_nvhe_idregs > __init_el2_cptr > __init_el2_fgt > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_BRBE > + __init_el2_brbe > +#endif This largely looks fine, but I note that we haven't bothered with ifdeffery for PMU and SPE, so I suspect it might be worth getting rid of the ifdeffery for BRBE. Mark.