Received: by 2002:a05:6500:1b8f:b0:1fa:5c73:8e2d with SMTP id df15csp639286lqb; Wed, 29 May 2024 06:38:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=3; AJvYcCX9KvSsaS32M+b5qDUlgx2PWVzdZemj4dqMu9VIYeMiLaQrBAw8QzI3vNjwOzXmEg+qICQz67ylmVgkNBwt1/mxX108o8dCm8m8HOM1cg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGtB1pT+WwR9V2+wzWu/fDg3p2DHVG7vP3bO9la4d1l/OYJvwnu4I5cz4m32pWxzCqhi97G X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5714:0:b0:43e:34d3:dae6 with SMTP id d75a77b69052e-43fb0e84bb5mr176726921cf.39.1716989899542; Wed, 29 May 2024 06:38:19 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; t=1716989899; cv=pass; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=S7m/nolaZicWLve4BUz4B6Ls9NTX3BCRJcxBtvdBMTr16FyWW8wzXUWgla2NHZn/+b G9SONXl/MhGnsNEmnyz8Op8YEIUSiMBjySv5PMfUaiClHNu5Jq9dvNqp5E4CjiRbZBvD EBGh9IrO/pnz0x0TnnJEUFPjMfG+hfi70s6pr0UtGr8+vRV3DDZdTP2nvHvrFgf+aqKR pCQCrNs04CuFoSvKkH95hGXsytq9/jWyadvmpGvYoaZgxsoyZyDvNhqp46jod6RryWhN +93hql9pdAl1twoljoVU5B+6CNpp7OtpDufMAs7BO3LS7M6g1fwpSA0kDaJWCAPHecpG eY3A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:list-unsubscribe :list-subscribe:list-id:precedence:references:in-reply-to:message-id :date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=17bK3Zm+pOpKfLjXFR2LImNaKORuqNr1blS5qJhWBFI=; fh=NxmCHexitX7P6x/7ARv3vZBmyAUGQGWkF2RSnxwWsIo=; b=rhAZzuvDOpRL48Ib5U+pXvNVX8M6gcYUPs5nVrdrzq33CAcJx0tE2QRzBmnZScCMBL x4oK0KGWLfaqLiIFLcXpo5R4efCnSCXAH/fM2zvvKDB72VogNZ5MkNjFnji+Vhs6W/nI ztKmqlK3tJqlK37P2h8IKDW8B4hiOgu/4u6Fw5sZztasM9TH8zKIvE3czEwXCIs9/02H cJKeqKzH2JVUZSW2aC69wE8JBpP552Sx0+oddJgfG2pBH/mx+llcjzDfd1hZ3sq65hNp ZWL7nPTUch7Lh0PJvmCgN6Y/TlNxGo37UT7RauGJ5hNedYxgn02YPHZVISgvPEW5M32Z 5UIg==; dara=google.com ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; mx.google.com; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=huawei.com dmarc=pass fromdomain=huawei.com); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-194172-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-194172-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=fail (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Return-Path: Received: from ny.mirrors.kernel.org (ny.mirrors.kernel.org. [147.75.199.223]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d75a77b69052e-43fb18c91ffsi132207211cf.658.2024.05.29.06.38.19 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 29 May 2024 06:38:19 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-194172-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.199.223; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=huawei.com dmarc=pass fromdomain=huawei.com); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-194172-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-194172-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=fail (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ny.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F2561C20897 for ; Wed, 29 May 2024 13:38:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2F2717C6A; Wed, 29 May 2024 13:37:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66D3417C73; Wed, 29 May 2024 13:37:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716989876; cv=none; b=RdkPhpjebfR2YcHIiYeXT0XQdq6+Rw72VTMSPHRcR26EuGRQSmb0YguLsRLqUMjVjml4NFY9399VRX9DLONgdrDvDr55xe8FNAs8225PI1Aq+Ei32EEGkgDDVn/jquJGhCbs8IFmDh9NK/8CwGlL0S47ggVpGNCca1Qg+j8bjCQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716989876; c=relaxed/simple; bh=OQvo/jQZ3vd1ZA2MKBCKRkejtDEw74IduRm3fkp7U+k=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=kfXYnMy4xEDaNU3kLT7srJP9AxrfEzDD9AM/ZR9d+7M/XJEAaQZJXdZRNX0CNhLGr3R1dUZqYC1ZzjL2+nTQqDGihVpaD4Jgym4236p8AacHyFlkRm7mG3IwsaCHaUytykodwoRpx2JXd9/LAwvbVF5wn+yEQnDTEkUM0XbwOiQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.31]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4Vq9M63bzTz6J6Db; Wed, 29 May 2024 21:33:38 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.163.240]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B601014065B; Wed, 29 May 2024 21:37:52 +0800 (CST) Received: from SecurePC-101-06.china.huawei.com (10.122.247.231) by lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.39; Wed, 29 May 2024 14:37:52 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Marc Zyngier , Will Deacon , Catalin Marinas , , , , , CC: Mark Rutland , Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra , , , Russell King , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Miguel Luis , James Morse , Salil Mehta , Jean-Philippe Brucker , Hanjun Guo , Gavin Shan , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , , , Subject: [PATCH v10 06/19] ACPI: processor: Move checks and availability of acpi_processor earlier Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 14:34:33 +0100 Message-ID: <20240529133446.28446-7-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20240529133446.28446-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> References: <20240529133446.28446-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml100001.china.huawei.com (7.191.160.183) To lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) Make the per_cpu(processors, cpu) entries available earlier so that they are available in arch_register_cpu() as ARM64 will need access to the acpi_handle to distinguish between acpi_processor_add() and earlier registration attempts (which will fail as _STA cannot be checked). Reorder the remove flow to clear this per_cpu() after arch_unregister_cpu() has completed, allowing it to be used in there as well. Note that on x86 for the CPU hotplug case, the pr->id prior to acpi_map_cpu() may be invalid. Thus the per_cpu() structures must be initialized after that call or after checking the ID is valid (not hotplug path). Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron --- v10: Thanks To Rafael and Gavin for the same suggestion. - Make the acpi_process_set_per_cpu() function return an int (-EINVAL or 0 as appropriate), simplifying how it is used. --- drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 88 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c index 16e36e55a560..0bc0419adf6b 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c @@ -183,8 +183,38 @@ static void __init acpi_pcc_cpufreq_init(void) {} #endif /* CONFIG_X86 */ /* Initialization */ +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(void *, processor_device_array); + +static int acpi_processor_set_per_cpu(struct acpi_processor *pr, + struct acpi_device *device) +{ + BUG_ON(pr->id >= nr_cpu_ids); + + /* + * Buggy BIOS check. + * ACPI id of processors can be reported wrongly by the BIOS. + * Don't trust it blindly + */ + if (per_cpu(processor_device_array, pr->id) != NULL && + per_cpu(processor_device_array, pr->id) != device) { + dev_warn(&device->dev, + "BIOS reported wrong ACPI id %d for the processor\n", + pr->id); + return -EINVAL; + } + /* + * processor_device_array is not cleared on errors to allow buggy BIOS + * checks. + */ + per_cpu(processor_device_array, pr->id) = device; + per_cpu(processors, pr->id) = pr; + + return 0; +} + #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU -static int acpi_processor_hotadd_init(struct acpi_processor *pr) +static int acpi_processor_hotadd_init(struct acpi_processor *pr, + struct acpi_device *device) { int ret; @@ -198,8 +228,16 @@ static int acpi_processor_hotadd_init(struct acpi_processor *pr) if (ret) goto out; + ret = acpi_processor_set_per_cpu(pr, device); + if (ret) { + acpi_unmap_cpu(pr->id); + goto out; + } + ret = arch_register_cpu(pr->id); if (ret) { + /* Leave the processor device array in place to detect buggy bios */ + per_cpu(processors, pr->id) = NULL; acpi_unmap_cpu(pr->id); goto out; } @@ -217,7 +255,8 @@ static int acpi_processor_hotadd_init(struct acpi_processor *pr) return ret; } #else -static inline int acpi_processor_hotadd_init(struct acpi_processor *pr) +static inline int acpi_processor_hotadd_init(struct acpi_processor *pr, + struct acpi_device *device) { return -ENODEV; } @@ -232,6 +271,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_device *device) acpi_status status = AE_OK; static int cpu0_initialized; unsigned long long value; + int ret; acpi_processor_errata(); @@ -315,12 +355,12 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_device *device) * NOTE: Even if the processor has a cpuid, it may not be present * because cpuid <-> apicid mapping is persistent now. */ - if (invalid_logical_cpuid(pr->id) || !cpu_present(pr->id)) { - int ret = acpi_processor_hotadd_init(pr); - - if (ret) - return ret; - } + if (invalid_logical_cpuid(pr->id) || !cpu_present(pr->id)) + ret = acpi_processor_hotadd_init(pr, device); + else + ret = acpi_processor_set_per_cpu(pr, device); + if (ret) + return ret; /* * On some boxes several processors use the same processor bus id. @@ -365,8 +405,6 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_device *device) * (cpu_data(cpu)) values, like CPU feature flags, family, model, etc. * Such things have to be put in and set up by the processor driver's .probe(). */ -static DEFINE_PER_CPU(void *, processor_device_array); - static int acpi_processor_add(struct acpi_device *device, const struct acpi_device_id *id) { @@ -395,28 +433,6 @@ static int acpi_processor_add(struct acpi_device *device, if (result) /* Processor is not physically present or unavailable */ goto err_clear_driver_data; - BUG_ON(pr->id >= nr_cpu_ids); - - /* - * Buggy BIOS check. - * ACPI id of processors can be reported wrongly by the BIOS. - * Don't trust it blindly - */ - if (per_cpu(processor_device_array, pr->id) != NULL && - per_cpu(processor_device_array, pr->id) != device) { - dev_warn(&device->dev, - "BIOS reported wrong ACPI id %d for the processor\n", - pr->id); - /* Give up, but do not abort the namespace scan. */ - goto err_clear_driver_data; - } - /* - * processor_device_array is not cleared on errors to allow buggy BIOS - * checks. - */ - per_cpu(processor_device_array, pr->id) = device; - per_cpu(processors, pr->id) = pr; - dev = get_cpu_device(pr->id); if (!dev) { result = -ENODEV; @@ -470,10 +486,6 @@ static void acpi_processor_remove(struct acpi_device *device) device_release_driver(pr->dev); acpi_unbind_one(pr->dev); - /* Clean up. */ - per_cpu(processor_device_array, pr->id) = NULL; - per_cpu(processors, pr->id) = NULL; - cpu_maps_update_begin(); cpus_write_lock(); @@ -481,6 +493,10 @@ static void acpi_processor_remove(struct acpi_device *device) arch_unregister_cpu(pr->id); acpi_unmap_cpu(pr->id); + /* Clean up. */ + per_cpu(processor_device_array, pr->id) = NULL; + per_cpu(processors, pr->id) = NULL; + cpus_write_unlock(); cpu_maps_update_done(); -- 2.39.2