Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-194255-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) client-ip=139.178.88.99;
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 16:19:53 +0200
From: Matteo Martelli <matteomartelli3@gmail.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, 
 Matteo Martelli <matteomartelli3@gmail.com>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>, 
 Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>, 
 Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>, 
 Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>, 
 Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>, 
 Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>, 
 Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>, 
 Marcus Cooper <codekipper@gmail.com>, 
 =?UTF-8?B?Q2zDqW1lbnQgUMOpcm9u?= <peron.clem@gmail.com>, 
 linux-sound@vger.kernel.org, 
 linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, 
 linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev, 
 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Message-ID: <665739895996a_26e4f3704a@njaxe.notmuch>
In-Reply-To: <a003dac1-de47-4a15-8959-25f7d5f1c129@sirena.org.uk>
References: <20240529140658.180966-2-matteomartelli3@gmail.com>
 <a003dac1-de47-4a15-8959-25f7d5f1c129@sirena.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] ASoC: sunxi: sun4i-i2s: fix LRCLK polarity in i2s
 mode
Precedence: bulk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 04:00:14PM +0200, Matteo Martelli wrote:
> 
> > I found an issue on the sunxi i2s controller driver while doing some
> > tests with a Pine64 A64 host board and an external codec (ES8311).
> > The A64 i2s controller is compatible with the sun8i-h3-i2s driver.
> > The LRCLK was being inverted when the bus was operated in i2s mode:
> > normally should be left channel on low LRCLK and right channel on high
> > LRCLK, but it was the opposite instead.
> 
> Please don't send cover letters for single patches, if there is anything
> that needs saying put it in the changelog of the patch or after the ---
> if it's administrative stuff.  This reduces mail volume and ensures that 
> any important information is recorded in the changelog rather than being
> lost. 

All right, sorry for that. Should I resend this patch without cover letter?