Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S286303AbSAFQ6v>; Sun, 6 Jan 2002 11:58:51 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S288990AbSAFQ6l>; Sun, 6 Jan 2002 11:58:41 -0500
Received: from ariane.ens-cachan.fr ([138.231.176.4]:27818 "EHLO
	ariane.ens-cachan.fr") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S286303AbSAFQ6e>; Sun, 6 Jan 2002 11:58:34 -0500
To: dewar@gnat.com
Cc: gdr@codesourcery.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        paulus@samba.org, trini@kernel.crashing.org, velco@fadata.bg
Subject: Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
In-Reply-To: <20020106134110.62076F2FA1@nile.gnat.com>
From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@codesourcery.com>
In-Reply-To: dewar@gnat.com's message of "Sun,  6 Jan 2002 08:41:10 -0500 (EST)"
Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Date: 06 Jan 2002 17:58:12 +0100
Message-ID: <flell3ct7f.fsf@riz.cmla.ens-cachan.fr>
Lines: 11
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.6.45/Emacs 19.34
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

dewar@gnat.com writes:

| >>Isn't the incriminated construct already outside of C and non-portable?
| 
| The issue is not whether it is outside standard-C here, which of course
| it is,

Stripping the context of my previous message certainly makes your
answer non-rhetorical. 

-- Gaby
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/