Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-195352-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) client-ip=139.178.88.99;
Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 14:21:28 +0200
From: Christian Heusel <christian@heusel.eu>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org, 
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [tip: x86/urgent] x86/topology/amd: Evaluate SMT in CPUID leaf
 0x8000001e only on family 0x17 and greater
Message-ID: <xoof7q7s6gak5iyvp3x6lgksqlpmw6sfiqvyjqc53m7egrvuya@vb7w6uoq25w7>
References: <7skhx6mwe4hxiul64v6azhlxnokheorksqsdbp7qw6g2jduf6c@7b5pvomauugk>
 <171697474837.10875.6335609575452053884.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
 <2gj2lkahha4wzyf2ol6xk2ermrmsxaklznrisixdg4m3ogzten@gbrtiyjebeup>
 <20240530085914.GAZlg_4lcZIaa83jVb@fat_crate.local>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nj5e2rqilf7cvfqc"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20240530085914.GAZlg_4lcZIaa83jVb@fat_crate.local>
UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:3pKsS524UNg=;vn276BggOWYLHFFQPpUCGhVVp8G
 BgBw66xJROmpHa0Q56pN3n/7QsUQXzt/10uezS7aqXDZ0JEKys1B3I6rUE/WyCGJtEIWa6BBH
 XABTaNwBlVDWL6j3x2BmdEx9rOAL/5SdST6gDz24QMegXFc4D+JvlCjbKU3kXi3Y3A5ctl3BY
 JsronITgfPJel69juz7eLhAE0mxj8eaVxrXMJNHHi2HE8Ek5mDPOnpi/3VARxsxKiv5EUCrlW
 qHC2tsWRah2mVYwmv7TGs2F3mlL/XM9Ca2YGc3tX0XHeIKlWAZZ8rc72hWlEw6WDPaYwdmjTA
 NANlrQQZHMP+8vVviWZL+kIAUFppd5wCEhYV3rveWLU4c1ejhkHSRD3nEtaBJx98AWOQfDtFm
 VgHUkFjtZYa7E0t0kk0sI42208DCYe+3X2xT3wrupMekAziyACxBjyS/i0kx6U6lP1kUBMHeW
 OcuTY9930jIKJEZC5PIIJ8FIoSc+xbaMBTq4ZslgBuO0xUyqr/5y3+Z0F3mDnWwnoYR9zsxHn
 ZI8aQPWLeEMESJbkNIHdc4YphBeqGJKO/wbHbd6FZtRjO5bCMIpDlxnyl5zfcbopO4fBMxCVI
 VIZ5SUwV/8gyMghF4ihm8Ny8J0fxBZWq2VIdJOH0kxruloKUifMgnB/S0t70povTW+BIhfytC
 PJ7CbjE6d4hjNM1JWRQImK1WmhAzg3UYwIfAP4kaalSMNLK4b9eoYMd4eD4h/RswWJNB5BJAh
 exd6rBbMBkDw2NtwELquBzoLH9qvxxkwfwk5Jd4+hozRoR4iuoPcW4=


--nj5e2rqilf7cvfqc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 24/05/30 10:59AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 12:40:50AM +0200, Christian Heusel wrote:
> > it seems like somehow the patch has lost the following two trailers
> > compared to the list variant[0] while being applied:
> >=20
> >     Bisected-by: Christian Heusel <christian@heusel.eu>
> >     Cc: regressions@lists.linux.dev
> >=20
> > Did that happen on purpose or did some scripts fail?
>=20
> Well, we don't add unknown tags because it was getting unwieldy and
> Bisected-by is not really one we do. I can offer
>=20
> 	Reported-by: Christian Heusel <christian@heusel.eu>
>=20
> as bisection is important work and it should be documented.
>=20
> How does that sound?

Sounds good! I thought it was a thing because I saw it used in a few
places, i.e. here:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git/commit/?id=3De3=
7617c8e53a1f7fcba6d5e1041f4fd8a2425c27

I'll keep it in mind for future bug reports! :)

Have a nice week,
Chris

--nj5e2rqilf7cvfqc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=FIQN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nj5e2rqilf7cvfqc--