Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 22 Nov 2000 13:39:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 22 Nov 2000 13:39:15 -0500 Received: from smtp.alacritech.com ([209.10.208.82]:52997 "EHLO smtp.alacritech.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 22 Nov 2000 13:38:20 -0500 Message-ID: <3A1C0D09.428F5398@alacritech.com> Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2000 10:14:33 -0800 From: "Matt D. Robinson" Organization: Alacritech, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.17 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: 64738 CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: LKCD from SGI In-Reply-To: <974906422.3a1be4369213b@rumms.uni-mannheim.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 64738 wrote: > > Hi. > > I tried to find some information on whether the Linux Kernel Crash Dumps > patches are going into 2.4 (or 2.5). Has there been any decision? LKCD won't go into 2.4 (or 2.5) until I finish writing the direct disk open/write functions that avoid going through the standard IDE and SCSI drivers. I'm working on it. As far as work for 2.4 goes, we've got a version on SourceForge that works well (for i386 and 95% for ia64). As soon as the drivers are done, we'll hopefully get acceptance. --Matt P.S. Any way we can standardize 'make install' in the kernel? It's disturbing to have different install mechanisms per platform ... I can make the changes for a few platforms. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/