Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-195732-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::3;
Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 12:27:49 -0500
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Frank Li <Frank.li@nxp.com>
Cc: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>,
	Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Wilczy=C5=84ski?= <kw@linux.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
	Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
	NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Jason Liu <jason.hui.liu@nxp.com>,
	Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] PCI: imx6: Fix\rename\clean up and add lut
 information for imx95
Message-ID: <20240530172749.GA552716@bhelgaas>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ZldDIabPAa7NEmDQ@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810>

On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 11:00:49AM -0400, Frank Li wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 05:31:36PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 03:39:13PM -0400, Frank Li wrote:
> ...

> > > Base on linux-pci/controller/imx
> > 
> > This applies cleanly to the pci/controller/gpio branch, which has some
> > minor rework in pci-imx6.c.
> > 
> > When we apply this, I think we should do it on a a pci/controller/imx6
> > branch that is based on "main" (v6.10-rc1).
> > 
> > I can resolve the conflicts with pci/controller/gpio when building
> > pci/next.
> 
> Sorry, I forget update this. It should be base on linux-pci/next
> (e3fca37312892122d73f8c5293c0d1cc8c34500b). 

I prefer patches that are based on -rc1, i.e., the pci/main branch,
not on the pci/next branch.

If a series *requires* functionality that is already on a topic
branch, you can base it on that branch instead of on pci/main.

This series happens to touch some of the same code as
pci/controller/gpio, but it doesn't require those gpio changes, so it
does not need to be based on pci/controller/gpio.

Having this series based on pci/main means that if we update or drop
the gpio branch for some reason, this series will still make sense.

Bjorn