Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-196183-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1;
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
Precedence: bulk
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.500.171.1.1\))
Subject: Re: [PATCH] livepatch: introduce klp_func called interface
From: zhang warden <zhangwarden@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <ZkxVlIPj9VZ9NJC4@pathway.suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 10:16:46 +0800
Cc: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>,
 Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
 Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
 Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com>,
 live-patching@vger.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2551BBD9-735E-4D1E-B1AE-F5A3F0C38815@gmail.com>
References: <20240520005826.17281-1-zhangwarden@gmail.com>
 <alpine.LSU.2.21.2405200845130.11413@pobox.suse.cz>
 <BBD2A553-6D44-4CD5-94DD-D8B2D5536F94@gmail.com>
 <alpine.LSU.2.21.2405210823590.4805@pobox.suse.cz>
 <ZkxVlIPj9VZ9NJC4@pathway.suse.cz>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>


Hi Bros,

How about my patch? I do think it is a viable feature to show the state =
of the patched function. If we add an unlikely branch test before we set =
the 'called' state, once this function is called, there maybe no =
negative effect to the performance.

Please give me some advice.

Regards,
Wardenjohn=