Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-196268-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of amd.com designates
 165.204.84.17 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com;
 client-ip=165.204.84.17; helo=SATLEXMB04.amd.com; pr=C
From: Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@amd.com>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>, <bp@alien8.de>,
	<x86@kernel.org>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
CC: <mingo@redhat.com>, <tglx@linutronix.de>, <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	<pgonda@google.com>, <seanjc@google.com>, <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	<nikunj@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH v9 19/24] x86/sev: Change TSC MSR behavior for Secure TSC enabled guests
Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 10:00:33 +0530
Message-ID: <20240531043038.3370793-20-nikunj@amd.com>
In-Reply-To: <20240531043038.3370793-1-nikunj@amd.com>
References: <20240531043038.3370793-1-nikunj@amd.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 31 May 2024 04:34:43.5519
 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 8609ff7f-fb54-45fb-bb36-08dc812afe65
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 3dd8961f-e488-4e60-8e11-a82d994e183d
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=3dd8961f-e488-4e60-8e11-a82d994e183d;Ip=[165.204.84.17];Helo=[SATLEXMB04.amd.com]
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource:
	DS3PEPF000099D6.namprd04.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SJ0PR12MB7035

Secure TSC enabled guests should not write MSR_IA32_TSC(10H) register
as the subsequent TSC value reads are undefined. MSR_IA32_TSC related
accesses should not exit to the hypervisor for such guests.

Accesses to MSR_IA32_TSC needs special handling in the #VC handler for
the guests with Secure TSC enabled. Writes to MSR_IA32_TSC should be
ignored, and reads of MSR_IA32_TSC should return the result of the
RDTSC instruction.

Signed-off-by: Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Tested-by: Peter Gonda <pgonda@google.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/sev.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/sev.c b/arch/x86/kernel/sev.c
index b4458af92a73..1f6a8d85c816 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/sev.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/sev.c
@@ -1191,6 +1191,30 @@ static enum es_result vc_handle_msr(struct ghcb *ghcb, struct es_em_ctxt *ctxt)
 	/* Is it a WRMSR? */
 	exit_info_1 = (ctxt->insn.opcode.bytes[1] == 0x30) ? 1 : 0;
 
+	/*
+	 * TSC related accesses should not exit to the hypervisor when a
+	 * guest is executing with SecureTSC enabled, so special handling
+	 * is required for accesses of MSR_IA32_TSC:
+	 *
+	 * Writes: Writing to MSR_IA32_TSC can cause subsequent reads
+	 *         of the TSC to return undefined values, so ignore all
+	 *         writes.
+	 * Reads:  Reads of MSR_IA32_TSC should return the current TSC
+	 *         value, use the value returned by RDTSC.
+	 */
+	if (regs->cx == MSR_IA32_TSC && cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_GUEST_SECURE_TSC)) {
+		u64 tsc;
+
+		if (exit_info_1)
+			return ES_OK;
+
+		tsc = rdtsc();
+		regs->ax = UINT_MAX & tsc;
+		regs->dx = UINT_MAX & (tsc >> 32);
+
+		return ES_OK;
+	}
+
 	ghcb_set_rcx(ghcb, regs->cx);
 	if (exit_info_1) {
 		ghcb_set_rax(ghcb, regs->ax);
-- 
2.34.1