Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753064AbYBDKhF (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Feb 2008 05:37:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751218AbYBDKgy (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Feb 2008 05:36:54 -0500 Received: from mtagate3.de.ibm.com ([195.212.29.152]:39317 "EHLO mtagate3.de.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750891AbYBDKgx (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Feb 2008 05:36:53 -0500 Subject: Re: [patch 2/3] CONFIG_HIGHPTE vs. sub-page page tables. From: Martin Schwidefsky Reply-To: schwidefsky@de.ibm.com To: Andrew Morton Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar In-Reply-To: <20080202215315.3ac6907d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <20071112143009.425807965@de.ibm.com> <20071112144009.831296895@de.ibm.com> <20080201151541.8e3e0359.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1202017020.7208.2.camel@pasglop> <20080202215315.3ac6907d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: IBM Corporation Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2008 11:36:49 +0100 Message-Id: <1202121409.31801.7.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1518 Lines: 42 On Sat, 2008-02-02 at 21:53 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Sun, 03 Feb 2008 16:37:00 +1100 Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > Why dropping add-mm-argument-to-pte-pmd-pud-pgd_free.patch though ? > > I dropped the whole series. Sniff .. my patches .. ;-) > > It's a sane patch and a helps going further, and a total pain to re-do > > later on. Besides, I may have some use for it on powerpc at some point > > too... > > OK, I'll try to reestablish it. Fine. I've got the patch-merge message, so the first of the series is done. > Look: I can't fix *everyone's* stuff. This was a consequence of ongoing > unbounded churn in the x86 tree. If we can find a way of preventing those > guys (and everyone else) from trashing everyone else's stuff then we'd have > much smoother sailing. Understood. That is where I jump in and regenerate my patches on the latest available level. That the patches did hold up for some months in -mm now without really breaking anything is an indication that we can push them upstream now, isn't ? That would make the patch problem go away and I could queue my s390 specific page table rework. Our KVM people keep asking about it. -- blue skies, Martin. "Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/