Received: by 2002:a05:6500:2018:b0:1fb:9675:f89d with SMTP id t24csp401430lqh; Fri, 31 May 2024 05:10:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=3; AJvYcCWho3kGJ1WAhR1kx2tzJDU7FsfMhct+v00XtEW+l+2LtiTNI4zI//f6HTgO8+HRbLYDODrUYlQgxhdCzQU5NwbiTa8T9t9eaBX+gV9E9g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE4HhAfQyLgN6tnocYNdgQrnJsfnZpFIvk/VHhPEVjxi1F+3oARH25SYSHxpbtKKwwculfD X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:846:b0:a62:e450:b147 with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a65f0bd7d4fmr424643866b.29.1717157450159; Fri, 31 May 2024 05:10:50 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; t=1717157450; cv=pass; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=HexLqmwKk49+Qf0qtnQijtMzKgpuPxD1tDm19prv3mN4WdtYB00/M+Ti6btEcstlJL TNRgR0zx6yNrvA2q6s+Lr7gDb3Z+iAOGAeXrKDOpR3yU9t2Swsjijjra2RceZuA7Ph7I JNrlGQi88CDfytdMqUDURkElWV51D35HziLxa4yQAFWPyZdQLzllBvwJic9YCLYtO+0u FaLgt3XpA6cC3KfP5wCVKrkw5ghkjJcWdPUW1eyGsQtvdQ38QgQUkvDEE4JDunOxn+L3 yN7RZdqfjN+hM8g7y+ACp9aZ/wPrQQ035uKLzX/8uDTBTicKqHeTcKcGVjus/K1OisyL /hpw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:organization:autocrypt :content-language:from:references:cc:to:subject:user-agent :mime-version:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-id:precedence :date:message-id:dkim-signature; bh=HUUfifLtdPFXDqWDzwi5CqXyyklgl33lM3/uHSVy7aU=; fh=ExnAlRApRvKG3k/geuQjsmvISO9Pq78vcpKKyIE/hW4=; b=ugd5IfAN1ZO5pZtvJ0GInfCluI0RcnGRix5jQicsx8FvZ1KS0qmTa+Zkpfym0H1bNh xUh16ApLRt7/Xmj8HDBus/TYBaGENJKYb3MT9IfjWY81I2/cxP3wd9k6GA1ijtX4X/aJ RLddvqv3k8ELNPJiOULxOVBWZ4Qsa2ABm5rPcjJhNBKCMNogQaW0m/oRhvARC9RhEouA krb9RqzWJeJppPqKfMOeHvaYeWgJ2SPJXplyDa26U35vjQOwVEG3RnqHuDcu5JQS7n89 RMomI/NYMv95v9SXXDMXPvgpy5rK0RylacVoxYg9S2BE8OzdZXH+n77dBLy5q0YwSkDe JikA==; dara=google.com ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=FzUKrfJ3; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=redhat.com dkim=pass dkdomain=redhat.com dmarc=pass fromdomain=redhat.com); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-196753-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-196753-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from am.mirrors.kernel.org (am.mirrors.kernel.org. [2604:1380:4601:e00::3]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a640c23a62f3a-a688cbd6fbasi27102966b.266.2024.05.31.05.10.50 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 31 May 2024 05:10:50 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-196753-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::3; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=FzUKrfJ3; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=redhat.com dkim=pass dkdomain=redhat.com dmarc=pass fromdomain=redhat.com); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-196753-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-196753-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by am.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B66C11F2582E for ; Fri, 31 May 2024 12:10:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A2A11581FB; Fri, 31 May 2024 12:10:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="FzUKrfJ3" Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DB18156C47 for ; Fri, 31 May 2024 12:10:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717157441; cv=none; b=DWS8vH4lmlZRKM0xoRdV5sv5w/mXekwIfbypjd7EEmoyMexcPY6sbbHTIQtIKUhShvGyo+yP1gGh3QCJsT+gLUgnsF+1CotEJddj9YYCbcgDPx0fhusHb+wNPJh8kCGSqxwCYwtkbDiUw6wEoG/8JuDZzqGxqzs6p25w7lskZQ8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717157441; c=relaxed/simple; bh=+BcpMblAPCvCYvBPDjvLAjAWaHwFJlPzB5hWCYCtSJw=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=cz0wHBUdox4r76sFv3Ib99OYjjWPVCHvd5x/QPkEoBpbC5dsWlbR3d8zkpzzIDGe2FHvtR7uMrvOpIb7IlOVeKqeqfIFYOUET9aTtFivg58r3j6gpdVabjpLwSV4S6fZ49JizpuYoWB8Yrw8Tzm4iShtXc77qYaIuGmC8s8p/U0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=FzUKrfJ3; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1717157438; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:autocrypt:autocrypt; bh=HUUfifLtdPFXDqWDzwi5CqXyyklgl33lM3/uHSVy7aU=; b=FzUKrfJ37LwFpZ0PrL0LHAPT+XGZ9F7qhScikgrXQbCVlrWmJLTVnrzNoXDczM7zFWb8Wp NLUYa41uLzBOYdz0UK1pXmRgaAf6ynakrJQxVWwZKIG1hJs6XzRAEsxq/5mP8BYoBZBdZm BMOSRKWA65z+fT6ktPnKqaojX6HMW2I= Received: from mail-wm1-f69.google.com (mail-wm1-f69.google.com [209.85.128.69]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-32-Ericgqx1PdavcpZSM4SyVA-1; Fri, 31 May 2024 08:10:37 -0400 X-MC-Unique: Ericgqx1PdavcpZSM4SyVA-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f69.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-42108822a8eso11363935e9.0 for ; Fri, 31 May 2024 05:10:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1717157436; x=1717762236; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:organization:autocrypt :content-language:from:references:cc:to:subject:user-agent :mime-version:date:message-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=HUUfifLtdPFXDqWDzwi5CqXyyklgl33lM3/uHSVy7aU=; b=hMaRu2b7dBjrsdBygUIJwbDFim7WNDh8CSh+nYA8Tl02ClOhDybpQUcVIynAO1RT+X 7rIssqT/S1eMXSKtxvryzuG8y7mbk+CiAu9lPZaeRC4su4fV0fxJxBQxDvPi+xmlNffC 1UR+Gt46vPepuBGN9/Rld+KkydG3Axj1Y4poiGncd9NMW+LHNW/yzM6W34NmjHo7rf/R D+xQz2BRJSW5Xyj73KgAYh0QuomRd7pxrXbmHSrvfecsI8++CghlNNiw9+xBKaRElWgl H5j2YEP3P346uIi24s4jlzR0a5PsZ9xcWWAdt5iuCj7ZiBAJvhdlYy4x6QlbEaDrhzXZ rZtg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVlLiu8Sj5xjlynKupgpgffsWK9GQJXudgdRnYPCxInJq6/jyS/xNFQ0Cqs+jNrnMdBRZBYIZQHa758o8KVzBR5CkWUDTOT7rm9Sqij X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw20s/Ci1boM8IcM42/667xNvbqqPiJcsH39xXkmymzy7s8ROYl IFrX5GFegraNRL6qmf32sa99WzwvQuDQmv7TXBMIz47UaSG7gz+j/iqk7Hv7BoNBjH2cLyYC2Z4 RAoCzvrqUxJYr5+qeG8TNcpsdsIL3oh3LOxg1GnMklEOwxIHurIiA2F2VIvt28A== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1912:b0:417:eb5d:281b with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-4212811fea4mr44458345e9.17.1717157435560; Fri, 31 May 2024 05:10:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1912:b0:417:eb5d:281b with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-4212811fea4mr44457875e9.17.1717157434850; Fri, 31 May 2024 05:10:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2003:cb:c717:a000:d4df:4b8f:37d4:59e4? (p200300cbc717a000d4df4b8f37d459e4.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:cb:c717:a000:d4df:4b8f:37d4:59e4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-4212b85c61dsm23553845e9.28.2024.05.31.05.10.33 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 31 May 2024 05:10:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 14:10:33 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: swap: reuse exclusive folio directly instead of wp page faults To: Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com> Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, chrisl@kernel.org, surenb@google.com, kasong@tencent.com, minchan@kernel.org, willy@infradead.org, ryan.roberts@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Barry Song References: <20240531104819.140218-1-21cnbao@gmail.com> <87ac9610-5650-451f-aa54-e634a6310af4@redhat.com> From: David Hildenbrand Content-Language: en-US Autocrypt: addr=david@redhat.com; keydata= xsFNBFXLn5EBEAC+zYvAFJxCBY9Tr1xZgcESmxVNI/0ffzE/ZQOiHJl6mGkmA1R7/uUpiCjJ dBrn+lhhOYjjNefFQou6478faXE6o2AhmebqT4KiQoUQFV4R7y1KMEKoSyy8hQaK1umALTdL QZLQMzNE74ap+GDK0wnacPQFpcG1AE9RMq3aeErY5tujekBS32jfC/7AnH7I0v1v1TbbK3Gp XNeiN4QroO+5qaSr0ID2sz5jtBLRb15RMre27E1ImpaIv2Jw8NJgW0k/D1RyKCwaTsgRdwuK Kx/Y91XuSBdz0uOyU/S8kM1+ag0wvsGlpBVxRR/xw/E8M7TEwuCZQArqqTCmkG6HGcXFT0V9 PXFNNgV5jXMQRwU0O/ztJIQqsE5LsUomE//bLwzj9IVsaQpKDqW6TAPjcdBDPLHvriq7kGjt WhVhdl0qEYB8lkBEU7V2Yb+SYhmhpDrti9Fq1EsmhiHSkxJcGREoMK/63r9WLZYI3+4W2rAc UucZa4OT27U5ZISjNg3Ev0rxU5UH2/pT4wJCfxwocmqaRr6UYmrtZmND89X0KigoFD/XSeVv jwBRNjPAubK9/k5NoRrYqztM9W6sJqrH8+UWZ1Idd/DdmogJh0gNC0+N42Za9yBRURfIdKSb B3JfpUqcWwE7vUaYrHG1nw54pLUoPG6sAA7Mehl3nd4pZUALHwARAQABzSREYXZpZCBIaWxk ZW5icmFuZCA8ZGF2aWRAcmVkaGF0LmNvbT7CwZgEEwEIAEICGwMGCwkIBwMCBhUIAgkKCwQW AgMBAh4BAheAAhkBFiEEG9nKrXNcTDpGDfzKTd4Q9wD/g1oFAl8Ox4kFCRKpKXgACgkQTd4Q 9wD/g1oHcA//a6Tj7SBNjFNM1iNhWUo1lxAja0lpSodSnB2g4FCZ4R61SBR4l/psBL73xktp rDHrx4aSpwkRP6Epu6mLvhlfjmkRG4OynJ5HG1gfv7RJJfnUdUM1z5kdS8JBrOhMJS2c/gPf wv1TGRq2XdMPnfY2o0CxRqpcLkx4vBODvJGl2mQyJF/gPepdDfcT8/PY9BJ7FL6Hrq1gnAo4 3Iv9qV0JiT2wmZciNyYQhmA1V6dyTRiQ4YAc31zOo2IM+xisPzeSHgw3ONY/XhYvfZ9r7W1l pNQdc2G+o4Di9NPFHQQhDw3YTRR1opJaTlRDzxYxzU6ZnUUBghxt9cwUWTpfCktkMZiPSDGd KgQBjnweV2jw9UOTxjb4LXqDjmSNkjDdQUOU69jGMUXgihvo4zhYcMX8F5gWdRtMR7DzW/YE BgVcyxNkMIXoY1aYj6npHYiNQesQlqjU6azjbH70/SXKM5tNRplgW8TNprMDuntdvV9wNkFs 9TyM02V5aWxFfI42+aivc4KEw69SE9KXwC7FSf5wXzuTot97N9Phj/Z3+jx443jo2NR34XgF 89cct7wJMjOF7bBefo0fPPZQuIma0Zym71cP61OP/i11ahNye6HGKfxGCOcs5wW9kRQEk8P9 M/k2wt3mt/fCQnuP/mWutNPt95w9wSsUyATLmtNrwccz63XOwU0EVcufkQEQAOfX3n0g0fZz Bgm/S2zF/kxQKCEKP8ID+Vz8sy2GpDvveBq4H2Y34XWsT1zLJdvqPI4af4ZSMxuerWjXbVWb T6d4odQIG0fKx4F8NccDqbgHeZRNajXeeJ3R7gAzvWvQNLz4piHrO/B4tf8svmRBL0ZB5P5A 2uhdwLU3NZuK22zpNn4is87BPWF8HhY0L5fafgDMOqnf4guJVJPYNPhUFzXUbPqOKOkL8ojk CXxkOFHAbjstSK5Ca3fKquY3rdX3DNo+EL7FvAiw1mUtS+5GeYE+RMnDCsVFm/C7kY8c2d0G NWkB9pJM5+mnIoFNxy7YBcldYATVeOHoY4LyaUWNnAvFYWp08dHWfZo9WCiJMuTfgtH9tc75 7QanMVdPt6fDK8UUXIBLQ2TWr/sQKE9xtFuEmoQGlE1l6bGaDnnMLcYu+Asp3kDT0w4zYGsx 5r6XQVRH4+5N6eHZiaeYtFOujp5n+pjBaQK7wUUjDilPQ5QMzIuCL4YjVoylWiBNknvQWBXS lQCWmavOT9sttGQXdPCC5ynI+1ymZC1ORZKANLnRAb0NH/UCzcsstw2TAkFnMEbo9Zu9w7Kv AxBQXWeXhJI9XQssfrf4Gusdqx8nPEpfOqCtbbwJMATbHyqLt7/oz/5deGuwxgb65pWIzufa N7eop7uh+6bezi+rugUI+w6DABEBAAHCwXwEGAEIACYCGwwWIQQb2cqtc1xMOkYN/MpN3hD3 AP+DWgUCXw7HsgUJEqkpoQAKCRBN3hD3AP+DWrrpD/4qS3dyVRxDcDHIlmguXjC1Q5tZTwNB boaBTPHSy/Nksu0eY7x6HfQJ3xajVH32Ms6t1trDQmPx2iP5+7iDsb7OKAb5eOS8h+BEBDeq 3ecsQDv0fFJOA9ag5O3LLNk+3x3q7e0uo06XMaY7UHS341ozXUUI7wC7iKfoUTv03iO9El5f XpNMx/YrIMduZ2+nd9Di7o5+KIwlb2mAB9sTNHdMrXesX8eBL6T9b+MZJk+mZuPxKNVfEQMQ a5SxUEADIPQTPNvBewdeI80yeOCrN+Zzwy/Mrx9EPeu59Y5vSJOx/z6OUImD/GhX7Xvkt3kq Er5KTrJz3++B6SH9pum9PuoE/k+nntJkNMmQpR4MCBaV/J9gIOPGodDKnjdng+mXliF3Ptu6 3oxc2RCyGzTlxyMwuc2U5Q7KtUNTdDe8T0uE+9b8BLMVQDDfJjqY0VVqSUwImzTDLX9S4g/8 kC4HRcclk8hpyhY2jKGluZO0awwTIMgVEzmTyBphDg/Gx7dZU1Xf8HFuE+UZ5UDHDTnwgv7E th6RC9+WrhDNspZ9fJjKWRbveQgUFCpe1sa77LAw+XFrKmBHXp9ZVIe90RMe2tRL06BGiRZr jPrnvUsUUsjRoRNJjKKA/REq+sAnhkNPPZ/NNMjaZ5b8Tovi8C0tmxiCHaQYqj7G2rgnT0kt WNyWQQ== Organization: Red Hat In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 31.05.24 13:55, Barry Song wrote: > On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 11:08 PM David Hildenbrand wrote: >> >> On 31.05.24 12:48, Barry Song wrote: >>> From: Barry Song >>> >>> After swapping out, we perform a swap-in operation. If we first read >>> and then write, we encounter a major fault in do_swap_page for reading, >>> along with additional minor faults in do_wp_page for writing. However, >>> the latter appears to be unnecessary and inefficient. Instead, we can >>> directly reuse in do_swap_page and completely eliminate the need for >>> do_wp_page. >>> >>> This patch achieves that optimization specifically for exclusive folios. >>> The following microbenchmark demonstrates the significant reduction in >>> minor faults. >>> >>> #define DATA_SIZE (2UL * 1024 * 1024) >>> #define PAGE_SIZE (4UL * 1024) >>> >>> static void *read_write_data(char *addr) >>> { >>> char tmp; >>> >>> for (int i = 0; i < DATA_SIZE; i += PAGE_SIZE) { >>> tmp = *(volatile char *)(addr + i); >>> *(volatile char *)(addr + i) = tmp; >>> } >>> } >>> >>> int main(int argc, char **argv) >>> { >>> struct rusage ru; >>> >>> char *addr = mmap(NULL, DATA_SIZE, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, >>> MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_PRIVATE, -1, 0); >>> memset(addr, 0x11, DATA_SIZE); >>> >>> do { >>> long old_ru_minflt, old_ru_majflt; >>> long new_ru_minflt, new_ru_majflt; >>> >>> madvise(addr, DATA_SIZE, MADV_PAGEOUT); >>> >>> getrusage(RUSAGE_SELF, &ru); >>> old_ru_minflt = ru.ru_minflt; >>> old_ru_majflt = ru.ru_majflt; >>> >>> read_write_data(addr); >>> getrusage(RUSAGE_SELF, &ru); >>> new_ru_minflt = ru.ru_minflt; >>> new_ru_majflt = ru.ru_majflt; >>> >>> printf("minor faults:%ld major faults:%ld\n", >>> new_ru_minflt - old_ru_minflt, >>> new_ru_majflt - old_ru_majflt); >>> } while(0); >>> >>> return 0; >>> } >>> >>> w/o patch, >>> / # ~/a.out >>> minor faults:512 major faults:512 >>> >>> w/ patch, >>> / # ~/a.out >>> minor faults:0 major faults:512 >>> >>> Minor faults decrease to 0! >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Barry Song >>> --- >>> mm/memory.c | 7 ++++--- >>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c >>> index eef4e482c0c2..e1d2e339958e 100644 >>> --- a/mm/memory.c >>> +++ b/mm/memory.c >>> @@ -4325,9 +4325,10 @@ vm_fault_t do_swap_page(struct vm_fault *vmf) >>> */ >>> if (!folio_test_ksm(folio) && >>> (exclusive || folio_ref_count(folio) == 1)) { >>> - if (vmf->flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE) { >>> - pte = maybe_mkwrite(pte_mkdirty(pte), vma); >>> - vmf->flags &= ~FAULT_FLAG_WRITE; >>> + if (vma->vm_flags & VM_WRITE) { >>> + pte = pte_mkwrite(pte_mkdirty(pte), vma); >>> + if (vmf->flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE) >>> + vmf->flags &= ~FAULT_FLAG_WRITE; >> >> This implies, that even on a read fault, you would mark the pte dirty >> and it would have to be written back to swap if still in the swap cache >> and only read. >> >> That is controversial. >> >> What is less controversial is doing what mprotect() via >> change_pte_range()/can_change_pte_writable() would do: mark the PTE >> writable but not dirty. >> >> I suggest setting the pte only dirty if FAULT_FLAG_WRITE is set. > > Thanks! > > I assume you mean something as below? It raises an important point: uffd-wp must be handled accordingly. > > diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c > index eef4e482c0c2..dbf1ba8ccfd6 100644 > --- a/mm/memory.c > +++ b/mm/memory.c > @@ -4317,6 +4317,10 @@ vm_fault_t do_swap_page(struct vm_fault *vmf) > add_mm_counter(vma->vm_mm, MM_SWAPENTS, -nr_pages); > pte = mk_pte(page, vma->vm_page_prot); > > + if (pte_swp_soft_dirty(vmf->orig_pte)) > + pte = pte_mksoft_dirty(pte); > + if (pte_swp_uffd_wp(vmf->orig_pte)) > + pte = pte_mkuffd_wp(pte); > /* > * Same logic as in do_wp_page(); however, optimize for pages that are > * certainly not shared either because we just allocated them without > @@ -4325,18 +4329,19 @@ vm_fault_t do_swap_page(struct vm_fault *vmf) > */ > if (!folio_test_ksm(folio) && > (exclusive || folio_ref_count(folio) == 1)) { > - if (vmf->flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE) { > - pte = maybe_mkwrite(pte_mkdirty(pte), vma); > - vmf->flags &= ~FAULT_FLAG_WRITE; > + if (vma->vm_flags & VM_WRITE) { > + if (vmf->flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE) { > + pte = pte_mkwrite(pte_mkdirty(pte), vma); > + vmf->flags &= ~FAULT_FLAG_WRITE; > + } else if ((!vma_soft_dirty_enabled(vma) || > pte_soft_dirty(pte)) > + && !userfaultfd_pte_wp(vma, pte)) { > + pte = pte_mkwrite(pte, vma); Even with FAULT_FLAG_WRITE we must respect uffd-wp and *not* do a pte_mkwrite(pte). So we have to catch and handle that earlier (I could have sworn we handle that somehow). Note that the existing pte = pte_mkuffd_wp(pte); Will fix that up because it does an implicit pte_wrprotect(). So maybe what would work is if ((vma->vm_flags & VM_WRITE) && !userfaultfd_pte_wp(vma, pte) && !vma_soft_dirty_enabled(vma)) { pte = pte_mkwrite(pte); /* Only set the PTE dirty on write fault. */ if (vmf->flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE) { pte = pte_mkdirty(pte); vmf->flags &= ~FAULT_FLAG_WRITE; } } -- Cheers, David / dhildenb