Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-196863-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 14:14:13 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Elinor Montmasson <elinor.montmasson@savoirfairelinux.com>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	shengjiu wang <shengjiu.wang@gmail.com>,
	Xiubo Lee <Xiubo.Lee@gmail.com>, Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
	Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@gmail.com>,
	Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
	linux-sound <linux-sound@vger.kernel.org>,
	devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	alsa-devel <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 9/9] ASoC: dt-bindings: fsl-asoc-card: add compatible
 for generic codec
Message-ID: <291daed8-a2e1-44d4-9a71-5bca2c585720@sirena.org.uk>
References: <20240515135411.343333-1-elinor.montmasson@savoirfairelinux.com>
 <20240515135411.343333-10-elinor.montmasson@savoirfairelinux.com>
 <ce9a87c6-4a5c-4f0a-a8df-1fdce8c1f5df@sirena.org.uk>
 <599489232.349333.1715936741672.JavaMail.zimbra@savoirfairelinux.com>
 <500db9de-6113-4e73-ba92-6e52ea292b32@sirena.org.uk>
 <1598202415.701258.1717159684103.JavaMail.zimbra@savoirfairelinux.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="KygPM2XsMX13VSvX"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1598202415.701258.1717159684103.JavaMail.zimbra@savoirfairelinux.com>


--KygPM2XsMX13VSvX
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 08:48:04AM -0400, Elinor Montmasson wrote:

> Then maybe it's not be a good idea to make this compatible generic
> for this contribution.
> The original intention is to bring support for the S/PDIF,
> so maybe the contribution should focus on this use case?
> In that case, would changing the compatible for "fsl,imx-audio-spdif-card"
> be acceptable?
> "fsl,imx-audio-spdif" is already used for the `imx-spdif.c`
> which does not use the ASRC.

Why not just use the existing compatible - why would someone not want to
be able to use the ASRC if it's available in their system?

--KygPM2XsMX13VSvX
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmZZzSUACgkQJNaLcl1U
h9CI/gf/Xn2/xlVXYFjqqRcmEeA+Mmby4XlBih17KdiGdDQeHIPD9tnY3ub27oEm
Uz2RM669ae1CKI/GTYYiZ1bB97E80YvV7vH92KowbeYrNnMK/un2WfCc4nofGAMj
ETU4lvrazJEj8xLQMM5XT+9zGSrd24cyJIwATqPD3NwNFOgZ0TncrCx7f7j2Hswd
WojlP7VZdmX0Ru2XpvjmnVCmDbaxZ543qbRFSp4+rIrWKGTUHowxahzaDbhziSla
BmX1BjJK0AW0+WnOS/ZaCApM8hQHxq6s/aFreHlth67DHmUtfsQtdIBUnEJJbRn7
UvwuEy+mXzr6YIXOjhrobfvp1XF/HQ==
=dJiZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--KygPM2XsMX13VSvX--