Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-197281-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1;
Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 20:06:02 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: "Kalra, Ashish" <ashish.kalra@amd.com>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, x86@kernel.org,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
	Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@intel.com>,
	Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@intel.com>,
	Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
	Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	"Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@intel.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>, Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>,
	Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Tao Liu <ltao@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv11 11/19] x86/tdx: Convert shared memory back to private
 on kexec
Message-ID: <20240531180602.GIZloRisrPdjLhaVBG@fat_crate.local>
References: <20240528095522.509667-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
 <20240528095522.509667-12-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
 <20240531151442.GMZlnpYkDCRlg1_YS0@fat_crate.local>
 <75cb309b-b05c-42a0-a3ca-de08fa1cae59@amd.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <75cb309b-b05c-42a0-a3ca-de08fa1cae59@amd.com>

On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 12:34:49PM -0500, Kalra, Ashish wrote:
> SNP guest kexec patches are based on top of this patch-series and SNP guests
> also need this exclusive mem_enc_lock protection, so CC_ATTR_MEM_ENCRYPT
> makes sense to be used here.

Well, for the future, I'd encourage you to always send an Acked-by: you
or Reviewed-by: you as a reply to such patches so that it is clear that
such a change is desired.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette