Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 6 Jan 2002 15:38:59 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 6 Jan 2002 15:38:40 -0500 Received: from ariane.ens-cachan.fr ([138.231.176.4]:49071 "EHLO ariane.ens-cachan.fr") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 6 Jan 2002 15:38:27 -0500 To: mike stump Cc: dewar@gnat.com, gdr@codesourcery.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paulus@samba.org, trini@kernel.crashing.org, velco@fadata.bg Subject: Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix In-Reply-To: <200201061824.KAA19536@kankakee.wrs.com> From: Gabriel Dos Reis In-Reply-To: mike stump's message of "Sun, 6 Jan 2002 10:24:14 -0800 (PST)" Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Date: 06 Jan 2002 21:37:59 +0100 Message-ID: Lines: 16 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.6.45/Emacs 19.34 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org mike stump writes: | > From: Gabriel Dos Reis | > Date: 06 Jan 2002 14:22:45 +0100 | | > Isn't the incriminated construct already outside of C and non-portable? | | That has been established and agreed upon. What we are now into is | pragmatics. You now have to argue why we should not provide this | feature in some form to users that ask for it. Personnally, I don't have any sentiment against the assembler solution. Dewar said it was unnecessarily un-portable, but that the construct by itself *is* already unportable. -- Gaby - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/