Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754702AbYBDSQQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Feb 2008 13:16:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752790AbYBDSQA (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Feb 2008 13:16:00 -0500 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com ([66.165.176.63]:15594 "EHLO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752374AbYBDSP7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Feb 2008 13:15:59 -0500 X-SBRS: None X-MesageID: 40561706 X-Ironport-Server: ftlpip02.citrite.net X-Remote-IP: 216.142.71.134 X-Policy: $Relay X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,303,1199682000"; d="scan'208";a="40561706" Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 18:15:12 +0000 From: Samuel Thibault To: Greg KH Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Basic braille screen reader support Message-ID: <20080204181512.GR5205@implementation.uk.xensource.com> Mail-Followup-To: Samuel Thibault , Greg KH , torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20080204031842.GE4439@implementation> <20080204171008.GA22050@kroah.com> <20080204172441.GP5205@implementation.uk.xensource.com> <20080204180617.GA22656@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20080204180617.GA22656@kroah.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1149 Lines: 30 Greg KH, le Mon 04 Feb 2008 10:06:17 -0800, a ?crit : > > However, they share the same low-level primitives: the recently added > > keyboard and vc notifiers, screen_glyph(), inverse_translate(), > > kd_mksound, etc. > > I guess I'm worried that the hooks that you add here will not be usable > by speakup, and we'll have to add more in places close to this, but not > quite the same. Actually, speakup already just use these and no others. > I know speaking and "showing" are two different things, but they both > require the same data flow going into them in order to achieve their > goals, I just don't want to see this work being done without considering > both needs. I _am_ considering both needs. Actually, most of the recent commits to SpeakUp are mines :) > But, if you feel that both will work properly with these limited > exports, I have no objections. They already both do :) Samuel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/