Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-199358-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 17:24:27 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@amd.com>
Cc: linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	tony.luck@intel.com, x86@kernel.org, avadhut.naik@amd.com,
	john.allen@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] x86/mce: Increment MCP count only for timer calls
Message-ID: <20240603152427.GEZl3gKy75YAwJaZZH@fat_crate.local>
References: <20240523155641.2805411-1-yazen.ghannam@amd.com>
 <20240523155641.2805411-4-yazen.ghannam@amd.com>
 <20240524145335.GAZlCp7wAO22acrGyP@fat_crate.local>
 <3990ab6d-6217-4e10-bda9-6b5c7bd668c0@amd.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3990ab6d-6217-4e10-bda9-6b5c7bd668c0@amd.com>

On Mon, Jun 03, 2024 at 10:22:22AM -0400, Yazen Ghannam wrote:
> In this case, should we also increment the count in __mc_scan_banks()?

Well, that's called only in do_machine_check() and latter's not polling
the banks but called as a result of a #MC exception raised.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette