Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-199689-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.199.223;
From: Vasileios Amoiridis <vassilisamir@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 22:31:29 +0200
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Cc: Vasileios Amoiridis <vassilisamir@gmail.com>, lars@metafoo.de,
	himanshujha199640@gmail.com, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 04/17] iio: chemical: bme680: Fix sensor data read
 operation
Message-ID: <20240603203129.GB444780@vamoiridPC>
References: <20240527183805.311501-1-vassilisamir@gmail.com>
 <20240527183805.311501-5-vassilisamir@gmail.com>
 <20240602134106.2538471a@jic23-huawei>
 <20240602190015.GA387181@vamoiridPC>
 <20240603202303.0b1054a3@jic23-huawei>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20240603202303.0b1054a3@jic23-huawei>

On Mon, Jun 03, 2024 at 08:23:03PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> 
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static void bme680_wait_for_eoc(struct bme680_data *data)  
> > > Don't call it wait as that implies something is being checked.
> > > 
> > > bme680_conversion_sleep() or something like that.
> > >   
> > 
> > This sesnor has a sleep mode, so I think calling a function like that might
> > make it a bit confusing, since we are not putting the sensor into sleeping
> > mode but rather actually wait for the eoc.
> 
> Hmm. Bikesheding time. I don't like wait because it generally implies a
> condition check.
> 
> Maybe just go more explicit
> bme680_suspend_execution_until_conversion_done()
> bme680_suspend_execution_whilst_converting()
> or similar might be overkill but something along those lines.
> 
> The suspend execution terminology lifted from man usleep
> 

Well actually I realised that I can do some condition checks so I will resubmit
and we discuss again with the new feature.

Cheers,
Vasilis

> > 
> > > > +{
> > > > +	int wait_eoc = bme680_conversion_time_us(data->oversampling_temp +
> > > > +						 data->oversampling_press +
> > > > +						 data->oversampling_press,
> > > > +						 data->heater_dur);