Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-199761-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20240418012835.3360429-1-yosryahmed@google.com>
 <CAJD7tkZmDQi2HBOxe5u-Lji88NDuZKCQ_=N_O5aE1nq23aUPqw@mail.gmail.com>
 <9531f1fc-f91e-40ce-9432-5bcbba2fe2f7@intel.com> <CAJD7tkb7wz2P17pehTQtqjueMUxGaUOpFwzoQr_V39npOwuy7g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJD7tkb7wz2P17pehTQtqjueMUxGaUOpFwzoQr_V39npOwuy7g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 15:20:11 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJD7tkaVDrc=vioidZHM6KfdCqrCDt-HXn-RussNS145M1fNgg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip:x86/mm v3 1/3] x86/mm: Use IPIs to synchronize LAM enablement
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, 
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, 
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, 
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>, 
	Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, 
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 11:28=E2=80=AFAM Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>=
 wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 11:22=E2=80=AFAM Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.co=
m> wrote:
> >
> > On 5/6/24 07:37, Yosry Ahmed wrote:
> > > The merge window is approaching, is this patchset ready to be picked
> > > up? Is any further action needed?
> >
> > Yosry, the merge window is when we send content to Linus.  We generally
> > create that content weeks or months before the merge window.
>
> Right. The patch series has been idle for a long time so I assumed it
> was going to be picked up for this merge window, but given how close
> we have gotten I think we're past this now.
>
> That's fine, I am just trying to get some clarity on whether anything
> else needs to be done for this to be in a mergeable state.
>
> >
> > The best action on your here would be to touch base with Andy and make
> > sure he's on board with the solution you think he suggested.
>
> I have been slightly pinging the series and/or resending every once in
> a while, trying not to be too annoying :) Hopefully Andy will voice
> his opinion.

Hey Dave,

I have tried reaching out to Andy on and off list, and didn't have any
luck unfortunately :/

Is there any way we can still make progress on getting the fixes in
this series merged?

Thanks!