Received: by 2002:ab2:7903:0:b0:1fb:b500:807b with SMTP id a3csp1433125lqj; Tue, 4 Jun 2024 00:59:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=3; AJvYcCWlE1fnmcKkPJdVcg7uGIlEOMagb67yKRL69gP3dheXFqCHdbStjwsAwvBEwHijgMgHtx7bB8j7uWZ/r5rCkgP3CB1RMDENOGC6vqfnpg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFhXnMDXZNtMQ16F94O5XJJ5SBIcThOE4N+NFgUQprTfdVUgsPuCroh5Sd93GEMYoT4+lyC X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:d491:b0:1b2:a94b:5fc1 with SMTP id adf61e73a8af0-1b2a94b62e2mr1232452637.53.1717487998058; Tue, 04 Jun 2024 00:59:58 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; t=1717487998; cv=pass; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=YzZ4GujeyF/AeuXAHZ075vim+YIiyVLtzFG6I2klE9CfWm4SLMwmYRyv88y55+cFQ4 GP7T86TG5EGvCJOf4q7XVcTEvQ6Z0dZDc171kf/rDE9KiBKDmTCaTTsG3Zsltp2YLZpF /8fzgmQ+sHExHOb50C2LDrivc5PWol0bihyqZz2JHNO1y3JMv9h5UoCsj2XgAppZ71uL kXWv3GIKN9z+tnKCWk44YpLKRW7275oIXq0xL9/JzSZ9wcwoXRP9jrw9GpJx6xKXjmlg XzC4M1FPEK5uhARUw+XM7Q/fDa3qO4SgbpbNgWurwYbDW2OiEWBRK0HDG8vBzFppaxuJ n8+g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:organization:autocrypt :content-language:from:references:cc:to:subject:user-agent :mime-version:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-id:precedence :date:message-id:dkim-signature; bh=fhKGgBnctTbwLn+gwO3hK+Z8LhOuJ3SkwsQs2/qMiEo=; fh=U66TreBD/kueZPczWABfTAZW7qOLBgrL/SRLsqOF61E=; b=SUHY4y3cvIo5qjA+ivL31yKcJqeFKAUJngdSTb/0uO4txVngZSWYwqoTLHmK4gTcmL Ojle5XRqW1HyYiq4Dgt0ITBOzx4r7r6Pm7fP+AThaW4LIvv8Kmxvd3pSvMbd7/JRMqnr NWgRiRi2v5wU+1riMTvUgsZj53xrIOE2LoAjrwZ3oJTbpnv9wpfbueS8w0hGjD30VQXd p9mdCqtebLGtCfQPED4F3OjA+uvqxmmXL81ukUrFtzS5L7Ck+bDKa0oa778a9RzgVNQc kYR2dVX22xgYnCB641xw2DcFeydHxCo8PeBro6jxj3sSCAPIK4Sn8kg9vKebC6zVe4sm R36A==; dara=google.com ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=Uw0A3bzp; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=redhat.com dkim=pass dkdomain=redhat.com dmarc=pass fromdomain=redhat.com); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-200205-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-200205-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from sv.mirrors.kernel.org (sv.mirrors.kernel.org. [139.178.88.99]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 98e67ed59e1d1-2c1a77c3595si1690766a91.137.2024.06.04.00.59.57 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 04 Jun 2024 00:59:58 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-200205-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) client-ip=139.178.88.99; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=Uw0A3bzp; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=redhat.com dkim=pass dkdomain=redhat.com dmarc=pass fromdomain=redhat.com); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-200205-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-200205-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sv.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 486392846DE for ; Tue, 4 Jun 2024 07:59:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F2F11420B3; Tue, 4 Jun 2024 07:57:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="Uw0A3bzp" Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5DF114198A for ; Tue, 4 Jun 2024 07:57:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717487863; cv=none; b=mG9yfUhp6ScCYwIIJx1W1SfnlEzkMJUR/OiF002WXCXgo85xnVGvDV15wyg/E9YOYqOWr5u7sX8kGGeeuDHEizBAaSCODGYRN0BouK++3mqnmhwEiz9ZE8uE/AiavTteAvoqodti7i71iH+Rq0fwiaRrtw7sC56yPc4FRHr8sMk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717487863; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ErawTfT6GWyiHOBCJhtV9vZUNVYqvJIcBArGwtbMxuA=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=baW/jKIa9jW5AeJ5tp7svDfGIGxck60Q4i06aTIvWuq5P1k2MxJWCv3sWlmKjaY6rRQbQgwyo43hIvMbSb53Kc6XSr+0FuGXCF9jmJRBmTy5Dwn5WBUiJvPyyv0se2YEMYqVu/VKHZZ6PZlzJjmgoZKt6X739sxud9cBHIJiuBs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=Uw0A3bzp; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1717487859; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:autocrypt:autocrypt; bh=fhKGgBnctTbwLn+gwO3hK+Z8LhOuJ3SkwsQs2/qMiEo=; b=Uw0A3bzpLBLisep4sB9zqAWKB+9L+zf4LUM7j1csNOKpSaiCi/zTUlOUh9CS9719QgOQl0 /ImImezC0kVPbanj5cg8TGypZspDnzveyesjSguIl7LBvUdEWvUsmnFZshD3FAJ2AEM8ED +P0jZrW8ATWdzOvQM/LDv889OQGjuNw= Received: from mail-wm1-f69.google.com (mail-wm1-f69.google.com [209.85.128.69]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-670-bKgKG5brMQWncZPq2d5Bgg-1; Tue, 04 Jun 2024 03:57:36 -0400 X-MC-Unique: bKgKG5brMQWncZPq2d5Bgg-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f69.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-421388f1deaso6571915e9.3 for ; Tue, 04 Jun 2024 00:57:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1717487855; x=1718092655; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:organization:autocrypt :content-language:from:references:cc:to:subject:user-agent :mime-version:date:message-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=fhKGgBnctTbwLn+gwO3hK+Z8LhOuJ3SkwsQs2/qMiEo=; b=OWYauftsVz7DCCWwIy0lsQOtFByK+qfRN7Ao8udQURV7eUFNNzkA1Oaxo3ynhLMKQ2 ZaU790L8KfFXACbpJuVtQhnjlUKtJr2UtYRcd7UPGSW9WaWVgX4E8YYY0sBUaEPHRtxs goF6ecjDRLChfEJdCE7diRyCnrPwZq5HWyWZsyTbs3UKh3E23ucN5EHhjhfjKr00kj4l WlGrHe3QeDiKdVfp8fcY3/l0w3IXhW+Sz6re3Y8V+Kdm79qdc9cKPLWjAjEGTsCbIaIZ S7ufCnVvMtLdrxbzbciFw8rVa0aFkv329K2fvNd2OxRBjNyU3fjPteZ6WXgoXtMkM5uC IgHA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWgJYPDDx1w/XyKGCif/Yudsj5B5RICTQxs1KSxnAtlSLijyOex9wjp52MzCLY8BNT57K6DphJ/ZToNrrsT877iMB7gc0ZuLd8yq7Av X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yxrc5He3lLe7pFSCkAkXzNZbueZl3D2Gn49g8QsyhLUw4AJcmWx 4fRr/ilQ+qqnhGdrjzqcp1Yl6dvUZMuEF8usSSPpFZE61wMbHO99vbK0VFc93LRzDe/hAVvkNzZ WEluj2n+C1tmLH1zuCD3zqxiMihNojnkdPJxVtM0R/0BssmwqVD2pqlnesG07eQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3b0d:b0:41b:fc3a:f1ef with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-4212e0b08f7mr95905095e9.33.1717487855392; Tue, 04 Jun 2024 00:57:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3b0d:b0:41b:fc3a:f1ef with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-4212e0b08f7mr95904865e9.33.1717487854866; Tue, 04 Jun 2024 00:57:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2003:cb:c73a:3a00:a025:9b06:549e:c16b? (p200300cbc73a3a00a0259b06549ec16b.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:cb:c73a:3a00:a025:9b06:549e:c16b]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-4212b84ae09sm143652095e9.18.2024.06.04.00.57.33 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 04 Jun 2024 00:57:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 09:57:33 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next] mm: huge_memory: fix misused mapping_large_folio_support() for anon folios To: xu.xin16@zte.com.cn, akpm@linux-foundation.org, ziy@nvidia.com Cc: v-songbaohua@oppo.com, mhocko@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yang.yang29@zte.com.cn References: <20240604134738264WKaKYb3q_YTE32hNAy2lz@zte.com.cn> From: David Hildenbrand Content-Language: en-US Autocrypt: addr=david@redhat.com; keydata= xsFNBFXLn5EBEAC+zYvAFJxCBY9Tr1xZgcESmxVNI/0ffzE/ZQOiHJl6mGkmA1R7/uUpiCjJ dBrn+lhhOYjjNefFQou6478faXE6o2AhmebqT4KiQoUQFV4R7y1KMEKoSyy8hQaK1umALTdL QZLQMzNE74ap+GDK0wnacPQFpcG1AE9RMq3aeErY5tujekBS32jfC/7AnH7I0v1v1TbbK3Gp XNeiN4QroO+5qaSr0ID2sz5jtBLRb15RMre27E1ImpaIv2Jw8NJgW0k/D1RyKCwaTsgRdwuK Kx/Y91XuSBdz0uOyU/S8kM1+ag0wvsGlpBVxRR/xw/E8M7TEwuCZQArqqTCmkG6HGcXFT0V9 PXFNNgV5jXMQRwU0O/ztJIQqsE5LsUomE//bLwzj9IVsaQpKDqW6TAPjcdBDPLHvriq7kGjt WhVhdl0qEYB8lkBEU7V2Yb+SYhmhpDrti9Fq1EsmhiHSkxJcGREoMK/63r9WLZYI3+4W2rAc UucZa4OT27U5ZISjNg3Ev0rxU5UH2/pT4wJCfxwocmqaRr6UYmrtZmND89X0KigoFD/XSeVv jwBRNjPAubK9/k5NoRrYqztM9W6sJqrH8+UWZ1Idd/DdmogJh0gNC0+N42Za9yBRURfIdKSb B3JfpUqcWwE7vUaYrHG1nw54pLUoPG6sAA7Mehl3nd4pZUALHwARAQABzSREYXZpZCBIaWxk ZW5icmFuZCA8ZGF2aWRAcmVkaGF0LmNvbT7CwZgEEwEIAEICGwMGCwkIBwMCBhUIAgkKCwQW AgMBAh4BAheAAhkBFiEEG9nKrXNcTDpGDfzKTd4Q9wD/g1oFAl8Ox4kFCRKpKXgACgkQTd4Q 9wD/g1oHcA//a6Tj7SBNjFNM1iNhWUo1lxAja0lpSodSnB2g4FCZ4R61SBR4l/psBL73xktp rDHrx4aSpwkRP6Epu6mLvhlfjmkRG4OynJ5HG1gfv7RJJfnUdUM1z5kdS8JBrOhMJS2c/gPf wv1TGRq2XdMPnfY2o0CxRqpcLkx4vBODvJGl2mQyJF/gPepdDfcT8/PY9BJ7FL6Hrq1gnAo4 3Iv9qV0JiT2wmZciNyYQhmA1V6dyTRiQ4YAc31zOo2IM+xisPzeSHgw3ONY/XhYvfZ9r7W1l pNQdc2G+o4Di9NPFHQQhDw3YTRR1opJaTlRDzxYxzU6ZnUUBghxt9cwUWTpfCktkMZiPSDGd KgQBjnweV2jw9UOTxjb4LXqDjmSNkjDdQUOU69jGMUXgihvo4zhYcMX8F5gWdRtMR7DzW/YE BgVcyxNkMIXoY1aYj6npHYiNQesQlqjU6azjbH70/SXKM5tNRplgW8TNprMDuntdvV9wNkFs 9TyM02V5aWxFfI42+aivc4KEw69SE9KXwC7FSf5wXzuTot97N9Phj/Z3+jx443jo2NR34XgF 89cct7wJMjOF7bBefo0fPPZQuIma0Zym71cP61OP/i11ahNye6HGKfxGCOcs5wW9kRQEk8P9 M/k2wt3mt/fCQnuP/mWutNPt95w9wSsUyATLmtNrwccz63XOwU0EVcufkQEQAOfX3n0g0fZz Bgm/S2zF/kxQKCEKP8ID+Vz8sy2GpDvveBq4H2Y34XWsT1zLJdvqPI4af4ZSMxuerWjXbVWb T6d4odQIG0fKx4F8NccDqbgHeZRNajXeeJ3R7gAzvWvQNLz4piHrO/B4tf8svmRBL0ZB5P5A 2uhdwLU3NZuK22zpNn4is87BPWF8HhY0L5fafgDMOqnf4guJVJPYNPhUFzXUbPqOKOkL8ojk CXxkOFHAbjstSK5Ca3fKquY3rdX3DNo+EL7FvAiw1mUtS+5GeYE+RMnDCsVFm/C7kY8c2d0G NWkB9pJM5+mnIoFNxy7YBcldYATVeOHoY4LyaUWNnAvFYWp08dHWfZo9WCiJMuTfgtH9tc75 7QanMVdPt6fDK8UUXIBLQ2TWr/sQKE9xtFuEmoQGlE1l6bGaDnnMLcYu+Asp3kDT0w4zYGsx 5r6XQVRH4+5N6eHZiaeYtFOujp5n+pjBaQK7wUUjDilPQ5QMzIuCL4YjVoylWiBNknvQWBXS lQCWmavOT9sttGQXdPCC5ynI+1ymZC1ORZKANLnRAb0NH/UCzcsstw2TAkFnMEbo9Zu9w7Kv AxBQXWeXhJI9XQssfrf4Gusdqx8nPEpfOqCtbbwJMATbHyqLt7/oz/5deGuwxgb65pWIzufa N7eop7uh+6bezi+rugUI+w6DABEBAAHCwXwEGAEIACYCGwwWIQQb2cqtc1xMOkYN/MpN3hD3 AP+DWgUCXw7HsgUJEqkpoQAKCRBN3hD3AP+DWrrpD/4qS3dyVRxDcDHIlmguXjC1Q5tZTwNB boaBTPHSy/Nksu0eY7x6HfQJ3xajVH32Ms6t1trDQmPx2iP5+7iDsb7OKAb5eOS8h+BEBDeq 3ecsQDv0fFJOA9ag5O3LLNk+3x3q7e0uo06XMaY7UHS341ozXUUI7wC7iKfoUTv03iO9El5f XpNMx/YrIMduZ2+nd9Di7o5+KIwlb2mAB9sTNHdMrXesX8eBL6T9b+MZJk+mZuPxKNVfEQMQ a5SxUEADIPQTPNvBewdeI80yeOCrN+Zzwy/Mrx9EPeu59Y5vSJOx/z6OUImD/GhX7Xvkt3kq Er5KTrJz3++B6SH9pum9PuoE/k+nntJkNMmQpR4MCBaV/J9gIOPGodDKnjdng+mXliF3Ptu6 3oxc2RCyGzTlxyMwuc2U5Q7KtUNTdDe8T0uE+9b8BLMVQDDfJjqY0VVqSUwImzTDLX9S4g/8 kC4HRcclk8hpyhY2jKGluZO0awwTIMgVEzmTyBphDg/Gx7dZU1Xf8HFuE+UZ5UDHDTnwgv7E th6RC9+WrhDNspZ9fJjKWRbveQgUFCpe1sa77LAw+XFrKmBHXp9ZVIe90RMe2tRL06BGiRZr jPrnvUsUUsjRoRNJjKKA/REq+sAnhkNPPZ/NNMjaZ5b8Tovi8C0tmxiCHaQYqj7G2rgnT0kt WNyWQQ== Organization: Red Hat In-Reply-To: <20240604134738264WKaKYb3q_YTE32hNAy2lz@zte.com.cn> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 04.06.24 07:47, xu.xin16@zte.com.cn wrote: > From: Ran Xiaokai > > When I did a large folios split test, a WARNING > "[ 5059.122759][ T166] Cannot split file folio to non-0 order" > was triggered. But my test cases are only for anonmous folios. > while mapping_large_folio_support() is only reasonable for page > cache folios. Agreed. I wonder if mapping_large_folio_support() should either a) Complain if used for anon folios, so we can detect the wrong use more easily. (VM_WARN_ON_ONCE()) b) Return "true" for anonymous mappings, although that's more debatable. > > In split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(), the folio passed to > mapping_large_folio_support() maybe anonmous folio. The > folio_test_anon() check is missing. So the split of the anonmous THP > is failed. This is also the same for shmem_mapping(). We'd better add > a check for both. But the shmem_mapping() in __split_huge_page() is > not involved, as for anonmous folios, the end parameter is set to -1, so > (head[i].index >= end) is always false. shmem_mapping() is not called. > > Using /sys/kernel/debug/split_huge_pages to verify this, with this > patch, large anon THP is successfully split and the warning is ceased. > > Signed-off-by: Ran Xiaokai > Cc: xu xin > Cc: Yang Yang > --- > mm/huge_memory.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------ > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c > index 317de2afd371..4c9c7e5ea20c 100644 > --- a/mm/huge_memory.c > +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c > @@ -3009,31 +3009,33 @@ int split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(struct page *page, struct list_head *list, > if (new_order >= folio_order(folio)) > return -EINVAL; > > - /* Cannot split anonymous THP to order-1 */ > - if (new_order == 1 && folio_test_anon(folio)) { > - VM_WARN_ONCE(1, "Cannot split to order-1 folio"); > - return -EINVAL; > - } > - > if (new_order) { > /* Only swapping a whole PMD-mapped folio is supported */ > if (folio_test_swapcache(folio)) > return -EINVAL; > - /* Split shmem folio to non-zero order not supported */ > - if (shmem_mapping(folio->mapping)) { > - VM_WARN_ONCE(1, > - "Cannot split shmem folio to non-0 order"); > - return -EINVAL; > - } > - /* No split if the file system does not support large folio */ > - if (!mapping_large_folio_support(folio->mapping)) { > - VM_WARN_ONCE(1, > - "Cannot split file folio to non-0 order"); > - return -EINVAL; > + > + if (folio_test_anon(folio)) { > + /* Cannot split anonymous THP to order-1 */ > + if (new_order == 1) { > + VM_WARN_ONCE(1, "Cannot split to order-1 folio"); > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + } else { > + /* Split shmem folio to non-zero order not supported */ > + if (shmem_mapping(folio->mapping)) { > + VM_WARN_ONCE(1, > + "Cannot split shmem folio to non-0 order"); > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + /* No split if the file system does not support large folio */ > + if (!mapping_large_folio_support(folio->mapping)) { > + VM_WARN_ONCE(1, > + "Cannot split file folio to non-0 order"); > + return -EINVAL; > + } > } > } What about the following sequence: if (folio_test_anon(folio)) { if (new_order == 1) ... } else if (new_order) { if (shmem_mapping(...)) ... ... } if (folio_test_swapcache(folio) && new_order) return -EINVAL; Should result in less churn and reduce indentation level. -- Cheers, David / dhildenb