Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757985AbYBECHT (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Feb 2008 21:07:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754756AbYBECHG (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Feb 2008 21:07:06 -0500 Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.178]:45233 "EHLO wa-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754119AbYBECHE (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Feb 2008 21:07:04 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=LSMj2L+CJ3HEv2npgP08NT/rOuO6BxVI2oH+Hix01PSskD42KyxyqovOGQTgTQ2NyDoxuGvEB/mx4Y8Wx3P8Efzb+ARSu0aG7SeC0SCgZ9f7uh0gl78qTU3gnLxFPx4brjEdd/Weu/I4R/CmuQYNVQAHIgvfrxMlkBAGjx7u/yI= Message-ID: <165ac690802041807r147531d8s6bb5f3a1f254bcbb@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 20:07:01 -0600 From: "Chris Weiss" To: dougg@torque.net Subject: Re: [Scst-devel] Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel Cc: "Alan Cox" , "Mike Christie" , "Vladislav Bolkhovitin" , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, "Linux Kernel Mailing List" , "Nicholas A. Bellinger" , "James Bottomley" , scst-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, "Andrew Morton" , "Linus Torvalds" , "FUJITA Tomonori" In-Reply-To: <47A74BAA.6080201@torque.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <47A73C86.3060604@vlnb.net> <1202144767.3096.38.camel@localhost.localdomain> <47A7488B.4080000@vlnb.net> <1202145901.3096.49.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1202151989.11265.576.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org> <20080204224314.113afe7b@core> <47A74BAA.6080201@torque.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 865 Lines: 20 On Feb 4, 2008 11:30 AM, Douglas Gilbert wrote: > Alan Cox wrote: > >> better. So for example, I personally suspect that ATA-over-ethernet is way > >> better than some crazy SCSI-over-TCP crap, but I'm biased for simple and > >> low-level, and against those crazy SCSI people to begin with. > > > > Current ATAoE isn't. It can't support NCQ. A variant that did NCQ and IP > > would probably trash iSCSI for latency if nothing else. > > And a variant that doesn't do ATA or IP: > http://www.fcoe.com/ > however, and interestingly enough, the open-fcoe software target depends on scst (for now anyway) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/