Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755427AbYBEHWm (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Feb 2008 02:22:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751097AbYBEHWd (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Feb 2008 02:22:33 -0500 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:44332 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750909AbYBEHWc (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Feb 2008 02:22:32 -0500 Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 23:22:15 -0800 From: Arjan van de Ven To: Zachary Amsden Cc: for.poige+linux@gmail.com, Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: > best asked at one of the nvidia forums, not on lkml... Message-ID: <20080204232215.5063c4d9@laptopd505.fenrus.org> In-Reply-To: <1202194390.28740.8.camel@bodhitayantram.eng.vmware.com> References: <43d009740802022335y21c3f93ep4e444bef71338045@mail.gmail.com> <20080202235103.20dd9768.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <47A71040.5000300@gmail.com> <20080204052709.12f4e0d3.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <47A7F4DB.3070406@gmail.com> <47A80218.3040304@gmail.com> <20080204223430.415161e9@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <47A805C3.9050303@gmail.com> <1202194390.28740.8.camel@bodhitayantram.eng.vmware.com> Organization: Intel X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.2.0 (GTK+ 2.12.3; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1275 Lines: 34 On Mon, 04 Feb 2008 22:53:10 -0800 Zachary Amsden wrote: > > On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 13:44 +0700, Igor M Podlesny wrote: > > On 2008-02-05 13:34, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > [...] > > >> 1) To have compiled it I had to replace > > >> global_flush_tlb() call with __flush_tlb_all() and still > > >> guessing was it(?) a correct replacment at all :-) > > > > > > it is not; > > > > I see, thanks. What would be the correct one? ;-) > > global_flush_tlb() would be the correct one. ... except that that function got absorbed into the functions that would otherwise require this guy to be called (which is a needed step to do more selective clflushes for the specific range rather than wholesale wbinvd's that flush all 12Mb or your cache while you only need to flush 4Kb... but only the other function knew the exact range of stuff to flush) > -- If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@linux.intel.com For development, discussion and tips for power savings, visit http://www.lesswatts.org -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/