Received: by 2002:a05:6500:1b41:b0:1fb:d597:ff75 with SMTP id cz1csp197374lqb; Tue, 4 Jun 2024 08:48:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=3; AJvYcCVLaLtTb4YUH4BfNTVgNG/hOXcOCJIEt0TjyxhJ3WuHnwZ5v3IGwLBcN3h8xp2GesdN0/12QXR8BHKJb/1H3y40jyRFEkHV9b5eLiBSjA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEIiikonVEG9WVUJ3Y7J5TtAzmcjAt+Z6s7s8jyAwASu+hk//4itGyeifjH1JmahZouAYyz X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:971f:b0:a68:362a:bfdb with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a68362acb0bmr994289566b.9.1717516121474; Tue, 04 Jun 2024 08:48:41 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; t=1717516121; cv=pass; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=y8zS/sB949zlZGMUiTC0kcoascjcBpLGARJIToopRbw9SuZJjBKfektDkPpzZhN5Rb piufX6tqSzQzLViuiqjs1bCY48cGAcQtUVCJo5Ubxx2/QAMT/gTT+nnj6jDCzRCaHZBk o79BqbX8Jw3gWaeXFPrcN0o/ldfZtM7SpAQQx7WDXk/WoqHEVnKKyLl+LupBfVAICIlw ZWEKIhRQ0bISOGykKkIf22mC30FmWACCTcUm2nF9Yn0/xlWu4+IChdzCyY+Eop8izd80 hBgM69OvTX/2OqaC9P1I6aqYsobFbVHfoElO+ZgrfGRMbAUc5PwhOxxW/ru002d2ajgB 0VYg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:list-unsubscribe :list-subscribe:list-id:precedence:references:in-reply-to:message-id :date:subject:cc:to:dkim-signature:dkim-signature:from; bh=NFjC1AYiTOqw3rC3z2gomjP0qeae2FRXS7jgtGN7DWk=; fh=w8FMODK3NZM8O0ThyyJPao++QsTCLUVzZfoxNL9NYMI=; b=NPlowMfHaGRBS/B4YtE41aMIIiZ0EDbeQaxTkRfSJHJhq4NXua+n3RMd45dXry8QDr jAFV2X8O2C++NnLrinSrS1896W96+RrFsDEiRLIpyzXhA1YELfIzTUwx9ls2O5wjgKTG 4GGnRLqFc39UzLmab0k/YlrjjiKKu4rbjmRwPvrINJVtSKyjaMHj0xioStrXYZR5rPE6 T2DE54JPaszYLWN3FBCUv/w2FZRGlA8gklnQZI66bQ6aAbovzqilfotXH59DTGehzg5a 6XkFrrgYwEq246m47Umc7m87eYzzRCJ+N4Fd/MCY4Dyc8b6L3JQXlYdUnFbtUYLoo9u4 zVBg==; dara=google.com ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linutronix.de header.s=2020 header.b=k56LO8pi; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@linutronix.de header.s=2020e; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=linutronix.de dkim=pass dkdomain=linutronix.de dmarc=pass fromdomain=linutronix.de); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-200992-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-200992-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=linutronix.de Return-Path: Received: from am.mirrors.kernel.org (am.mirrors.kernel.org. [2604:1380:4601:e00::3]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a640c23a62f3a-a68a4a93954si378206866b.727.2024.06.04.08.48.41 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 04 Jun 2024 08:48:41 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-200992-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::3; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linutronix.de header.s=2020 header.b=k56LO8pi; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@linutronix.de header.s=2020e; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=linutronix.de dkim=pass dkdomain=linutronix.de dmarc=pass fromdomain=linutronix.de); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-200992-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-200992-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=linutronix.de Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by am.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB5541F22032 for ; Tue, 4 Jun 2024 15:47:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7344514A633; Tue, 4 Jun 2024 15:44:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="k56LO8pi"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="NSBZiKgH" Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2548148FE4; Tue, 4 Jun 2024 15:44:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717515894; cv=none; b=DZeSG2vhLBX7xy0a0u0W3h21WlCNDWhg7Q27CJtK80/zgs/noi1AA+HAPcDeBl7eVgE62Oaxy21q/rJTjWrAoeMif8aSk9rXKnytLzNRroXgJL7Ko3Ki62Tuad+eg+FDjViSElW+xKLpvHeW1HPbybATo5sVKOhnGCIbjAMT37g= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717515894; c=relaxed/simple; bh=f49pIcC90uouPuwDyv/aXW+vyT3FgClyt0ZYDNCGKRw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=b9JENokuE8YruvjetpBXpL3eYedb65N0fl22vPBmu94u9fkYlAAydmDX1HinnJ2OzBjrG0F2a+7UsLLQW4gPtndCx1i6lQDXksltIYoQnp+q3ihKTjHqK4oViWGwHYMe5BOykh1r23v08KSJcaGU81EPFM5G164AekPmrAtElaQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=k56LO8pi; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=NSBZiKgH; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1717515891; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=NFjC1AYiTOqw3rC3z2gomjP0qeae2FRXS7jgtGN7DWk=; b=k56LO8pivFrddspVzQG3oEvcDdXE3uQoHwNt03SUKUTflbgyrU380WS9/o/6FATupASmsU N2VPb+FU8v2KWusYiovUHeUofCWkaHzFOPI0BI7zqP7CidChBGhjQ2/bh+1oCgbYokmICy GTXQvMIxOloc8s4MsE8hKVLAD+0C+XnQzyxOQPxOypO7FIxGFVkiQORw94nrmq9SnJlRwB bSLHlJt8La47lgoBGhH4pcDnIT5F+G51+UjgGKTs5t2ujrDvW+dDcYXSb+caEI7GbuViqY KSDTj2/mUJslgTdyT2F3i6FVEogrmITY3MM5TAzW/m+/EqyRRaPSl5ywBLstrA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1717515891; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=NFjC1AYiTOqw3rC3z2gomjP0qeae2FRXS7jgtGN7DWk=; b=NSBZiKgHEC8HVgcD0shR3YvbRKBbqdQMeo4/EkeUDh6Dd0OBkTo8MX5Vwif8Iuc6A3axtS kzRh942xEfdM65DA== To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: "David S. Miller" , Daniel Bristot de Oliveira , Boqun Feng , Daniel Borkmann , Eric Dumazet , Frederic Weisbecker , Ingo Molnar , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner , Waiman Long , Will Deacon , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Alexei Starovoitov , Andrii Nakryiko , David Ahern , Hao Luo , Jiri Olsa , John Fastabend , KP Singh , Martin KaFai Lau , Song Liu , Stanislav Fomichev , Yonghong Song , bpf@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v4 net-next 11/14] seg6: Use nested-BH locking for seg6_bpf_srh_states. Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 17:24:18 +0200 Message-ID: <20240604154425.878636-12-bigeasy@linutronix.de> In-Reply-To: <20240604154425.878636-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de> References: <20240604154425.878636-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The access to seg6_bpf_srh_states is protected by disabling preemption. Based on the code, the entry point is input_action_end_bpf() and every other function (the bpf helper functions bpf_lwt_seg6_*()), that is accessing seg6_bpf_srh_states, should be called from within input_action_end_bpf(). input_action_end_bpf() accesses seg6_bpf_srh_states first at the top of the function and then disables preemption. This looks wrong because if preemption needs to be disabled as part of the locking mechanism then the variable shouldn't be accessed beforehand. Looking at how it is used via test_lwt_seg6local.sh then input_action_end_bpf() is always invoked from softirq context. If this is always the case then the preempt_disable() statement is superfluous. If this is not always invoked from softirq then disabling only preemption is not sufficient. Replace the preempt_disable() statement with nested-BH locking. This is not an equivalent replacement as it assumes that the invocation of input_action_end_bpf() always occurs in softirq context and thus the preempt_disable() is superfluous. Add a local_lock_t the data structure and use local_lock_nested_bh() in guard notation for locking. Add lockdep_assert_held() to ensure the lock is held while the per-CPU variable is referenced in the helper functions. Cc: Alexei Starovoitov Cc: Andrii Nakryiko Cc: David Ahern Cc: Hao Luo Cc: Jiri Olsa Cc: John Fastabend Cc: KP Singh Cc: Martin KaFai Lau Cc: Song Liu Cc: Stanislav Fomichev Cc: Yonghong Song Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior --- include/net/seg6_local.h | 1 + net/core/filter.c | 3 +++ net/ipv6/seg6_local.c | 22 ++++++++++++++-------- 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/net/seg6_local.h b/include/net/seg6_local.h index 3fab9dec2ec45..888c1ce6f5272 100644 --- a/include/net/seg6_local.h +++ b/include/net/seg6_local.h @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ extern int seg6_lookup_nexthop(struct sk_buff *skb, struc= t in6_addr *nhaddr, extern bool seg6_bpf_has_valid_srh(struct sk_buff *skb); =20 struct seg6_bpf_srh_state { + local_lock_t bh_lock; struct ipv6_sr_hdr *srh; u16 hdrlen; bool valid; diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c index 7c46ecba3b01b..ba1a739a9bedc 100644 --- a/net/core/filter.c +++ b/net/core/filter.c @@ -6450,6 +6450,7 @@ BPF_CALL_4(bpf_lwt_seg6_store_bytes, struct sk_buff *= , skb, u32, offset, void *srh_tlvs, *srh_end, *ptr; int srhoff =3D 0; =20 + lockdep_assert_held(&srh_state->bh_lock); if (srh =3D=3D NULL) return -EINVAL; =20 @@ -6506,6 +6507,7 @@ BPF_CALL_4(bpf_lwt_seg6_action, struct sk_buff *, skb, int hdroff =3D 0; int err; =20 + lockdep_assert_held(&srh_state->bh_lock); switch (action) { case SEG6_LOCAL_ACTION_END_X: if (!seg6_bpf_has_valid_srh(skb)) @@ -6582,6 +6584,7 @@ BPF_CALL_3(bpf_lwt_seg6_adjust_srh, struct sk_buff *,= skb, u32, offset, int srhoff =3D 0; int ret; =20 + lockdep_assert_held(&srh_state->bh_lock); if (unlikely(srh =3D=3D NULL)) return -EINVAL; =20 diff --git a/net/ipv6/seg6_local.c b/net/ipv6/seg6_local.c index 24e2b4b494cb0..c4828c6620f07 100644 --- a/net/ipv6/seg6_local.c +++ b/net/ipv6/seg6_local.c @@ -1380,7 +1380,9 @@ static int input_action_end_b6_encap(struct sk_buff *= skb, return err; } =20 -DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct seg6_bpf_srh_state, seg6_bpf_srh_states); +DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct seg6_bpf_srh_state, seg6_bpf_srh_states) =3D { + .bh_lock =3D INIT_LOCAL_LOCK(bh_lock), +}; =20 bool seg6_bpf_has_valid_srh(struct sk_buff *skb) { @@ -1388,6 +1390,7 @@ bool seg6_bpf_has_valid_srh(struct sk_buff *skb) this_cpu_ptr(&seg6_bpf_srh_states); struct ipv6_sr_hdr *srh =3D srh_state->srh; =20 + lockdep_assert_held(&srh_state->bh_lock); if (unlikely(srh =3D=3D NULL)) return false; =20 @@ -1408,8 +1411,7 @@ bool seg6_bpf_has_valid_srh(struct sk_buff *skb) static int input_action_end_bpf(struct sk_buff *skb, struct seg6_local_lwt *slwt) { - struct seg6_bpf_srh_state *srh_state =3D - this_cpu_ptr(&seg6_bpf_srh_states); + struct seg6_bpf_srh_state *srh_state; struct ipv6_sr_hdr *srh; int ret; =20 @@ -1420,10 +1422,14 @@ static int input_action_end_bpf(struct sk_buff *skb, } advance_nextseg(srh, &ipv6_hdr(skb)->daddr); =20 - /* preempt_disable is needed to protect the per-CPU buffer srh_state, - * which is also accessed by the bpf_lwt_seg6_* helpers + /* The access to the per-CPU buffer srh_state is protected by running + * always in softirq context (with disabled BH). On PREEMPT_RT the + * required locking is provided by the following local_lock_nested_bh() + * statement. It is also accessed by the bpf_lwt_seg6_* helpers via + * bpf_prog_run_save_cb(). */ - preempt_disable(); + local_lock_nested_bh(&seg6_bpf_srh_states.bh_lock); + srh_state =3D this_cpu_ptr(&seg6_bpf_srh_states); srh_state->srh =3D srh; srh_state->hdrlen =3D srh->hdrlen << 3; srh_state->valid =3D true; @@ -1446,15 +1452,15 @@ static int input_action_end_bpf(struct sk_buff *skb, =20 if (srh_state->srh && !seg6_bpf_has_valid_srh(skb)) goto drop; + local_unlock_nested_bh(&seg6_bpf_srh_states.bh_lock); =20 - preempt_enable(); if (ret !=3D BPF_REDIRECT) seg6_lookup_nexthop(skb, NULL, 0); =20 return dst_input(skb); =20 drop: - preempt_enable(); + local_unlock_nested_bh(&seg6_bpf_srh_states.bh_lock); kfree_skb(skb); return -EINVAL; } --=20 2.45.1