Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-201226-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.48.161 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.48.161;
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 20:05:54 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
	ardb@kernel.org, ashish.kalra@amd.com, bhe@redhat.com,
	dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, elena.reshetova@intel.com,
	haiyangz@microsoft.com, hpa@zytor.com, jun.nakajima@intel.com,
	kai.huang@intel.com, kexec@lists.infradead.org, kys@microsoft.com,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	ltao@redhat.com, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org,
	rafael@kernel.org, rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com,
	sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com, seanjc@google.com,
	tglx@linutronix.de, thomas.lendacky@amd.com, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv11.1 11/19] x86/tdx: Convert shared memory back to
 private on kexec
Message-ID: <20240604180554.GIZl9XgscEI3PUvR-W@fat_crate.local>
References: <20240531151442.GMZlnpYkDCRlg1_YS0@fat_crate.local>
 <20240602142303.3263551-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
 <20240603083754.GAZl2A4uXvVB5w4l9u@fat_crate.local>
 <noym2bqgxqcyhhdzoax7gvdfzhh7rtw7cv236fhzpqh3wqf76e@2jj733skv7y4>
 <78d33a31-0ef2-417b-a240-b2880b64518e@intel.com>
 <u3hg3fqc2nxsjtfugjmmzlahwriyqlebnkxrbzgrxlkj6l3k36@yd3yudglgevi>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <u3hg3fqc2nxsjtfugjmmzlahwriyqlebnkxrbzgrxlkj6l3k36@yd3yudglgevi>

On Tue, Jun 04, 2024 at 07:14:00PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> 			/*
> 			 * If tdx_enc_status_changed() fails, it leaves memory
> 			 * in an unknown state. If the memory remains shared,
> 			 * it can result in an unrecoverable guest shutdown on
> 			 * the first accessed through a private mapping.

"access"

So this sentence above can go too, right?

Because that comment is in tdx_kexec_finish() and we're basically going
off to kexec. So can a guest even access it through a private mapping?
We're shutting down so nothing is running anymore...

> 			 * The kdump kernel boot is not impacted as it uses
> 			 * a pre-reserved memory range that is always private.
> 			 * However, gathering crash information could lead to
> 			 * a crash if it accesses unconverted memory through
> 			 * a private mapping.

When does the kexec kernel even get such a private mapping? It is not
even up yet...

> 			 * pr_err() may assist in understanding such crashes.

"Print error info in order to leave bread crumbs for debugging." is what
I'd say.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette