Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-201580-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
Message-ID: <6f9d7066-9592-4a14-a811-c2451cbc33fa@quicinc.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 17:02:06 -0700
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: qcom: add missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() macro
Content-Language: en-US
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
CC: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>,
        Banajit Goswami
	<bgoswami@quicinc.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>, Jaroslav Kysela
	<perex@perex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>, <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
        <linux-sound@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        <kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org>, <kernel@quicinc.com>
References: <20240603-md-snd-soc-qcom-sdw-v1-1-101ea8bcdd38@quicinc.com>
 <0bd0a518-4d85-4251-9bf9-d056dc3d7b08@sirena.org.uk>
 <be0ee1bc-336f-4960-a54c-8bb71449fd1c@quicinc.com>
 <1acb74e5-e768-40f0-9eff-06b37c0d79ee@sirena.org.uk>
From: Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com>
In-Reply-To: <1acb74e5-e768-40f0-9eff-06b37c0d79ee@sirena.org.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 6/4/2024 7:14 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 04, 2024 at 06:59:31AM -0700, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>> On 6/4/2024 4:56 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> 
>>> Is anyone getting any value from these MODULE_DESCRIPTION()s?  This all
>>> just seems like a huge amount of noise and I'm having trouble thinking
>>> of a use case.
> 
>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10770
> 
> Please include human readable descriptions of things like commits and
> issues being discussed in e-mail in your mails, this makes them much
> easier for humans to read especially when they have no internet access.
> I do frequently catch up on my mail on flights or while otherwise
> travelling so this is even more pressing for me than just being about
> making things a bit easier to read.
> 
> and I'm not seeing anything in the above link that articulates an actual
> use case.

Sorry for the terse response. I agree with others that it was premature to
enable the warnings before all the instances were cleaned. But since things
are as they are, and since I saw others had 100% cleaned drivers/net, I took
it upon myself to clean up some other top-level directories without worrying
about if it made sense or not.

/jeff