Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753314AbYBENid (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Feb 2008 08:38:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751142AbYBENiW (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Feb 2008 08:38:22 -0500 Received: from mo11.iij4u.or.jp ([210.138.174.79]:55875 "EHLO mo11.iij4u.or.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751147AbYBENiV (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Feb 2008 08:38:21 -0500 Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 22:38:02 +0900 To: mangoo@wpkg.org Cc: James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, bart.vanassche@gmail.com, vst@vlnb.net, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp, scst-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org Cc: fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp Subject: Re: [Scst-devel] Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel From: FUJITA Tomonori In-Reply-To: <47A80CB9.9000805@wpkg.org> References: <1201710175.3292.16.camel@localhost.localdomain> <47A80CB9.9000805@wpkg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20080205223740L.tomof@acm.org> X-Dispatcher: imput version 20040704(IM147) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1379 Lines: 26 On Tue, 05 Feb 2008 08:14:01 +0100 Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: > James Bottomley schrieb: > > > These are both features being independently worked on, are they not? > > Even if they weren't, the combination of the size of SCST in kernel plus > > the problem of having to find a migration path for the current STGT > > users still looks to me to involve the greater amount of work. > > I don't want to be mean, but does anyone actually use STGT in > production? Seriously? > > In the latest development version of STGT, it's only possible to stop > the tgtd target daemon using KILL / 9 signal - which also means all > iSCSI initiator connections are corrupted when tgtd target daemon is > started again (kernel upgrade, target daemon upgrade, server reboot etc.). I don't know what "iSCSI initiator connections are corrupted" mean. But if you reboot a server, how can an iSCSI target implementation keep iSCSI tcp connections? > Imagine you have to reboot all your NFS clients when you reboot your NFS > server. Not only that - your data is probably corrupted, or at least the > filesystem deserves checking... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/