Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-202136-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.48.161 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.48.161;
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2024 11:42:31 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
	dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com,
	mgorman@suse.de, bristot@redhat.com, vschneid@redhat.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kprateek.nayak@amd.com,
	wuyun.abel@bytedance.com, tglx@linutronix.de, efault@gmx.de,
	John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>, Hongyan.Xia2@arm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 08/10] sched/fair: Implement delayed dequeue
Message-ID: <20240605094231.GR26599@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <20240426093241.GI12673@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <c6152855-ef92-4c24-a3f5-64d4256b6789@arm.com>
 <2fba04b0-e55e-41f4-8b7a-723734fe1ad2@arm.com>
 <20240529225036.GN40213@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <7eac0774-0f9d-487c-97b6-ab0e85f0ae3a@arm.com>
 <20240604101107.GO26599@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <24e09046-74ee-4ebb-ac1a-bdc84568e825@arm.com>
 <20240604191220.GP40213@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20240605072225.GR12673@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <7b26df23-4977-4fad-8721-137a23932b6e@arm.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <7b26df23-4977-4fad-8721-137a23932b6e@arm.com>

On Wed, Jun 05, 2024 at 10:14:47AM +0100, Luis Machado wrote:
> ... thanks for the patch! The above seems to do it for me. I can see
> more reasonable energy use with the eevdf-complete series. Still a
> bit higher. Might be noise, we'll see.

W00t!!!

Let me write a decent Changelog and stuff it in the git tree along with
all the other bits.

Thanks for all the testing.