Received: by 2002:ab2:6d45:0:b0:1fb:d597:ff75 with SMTP id d5csp347966lqr; Wed, 5 Jun 2024 07:52:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=3; AJvYcCXKVnwHPG5ltfIY5yyXzQjOAtNKxUJV5z3Od+tPyFowYW6FMr2allPCIdkoAFlKsKABv13zfqVhEA3so/Dm6+gHUeztiSW6DI0yJZaG9A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHvG4SElPkHlOzqlQq7UgKCvNYhXuEZzJUji1iix4TJdJXtWVysC/VfZ7PP5wPBay/cdKrd X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:1561:b0:374:8fcb:a5f7 with SMTP id e9e14a558f8ab-374b1f40402mr30159095ab.26.1717599141343; Wed, 05 Jun 2024 07:52:21 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; t=1717599141; cv=pass; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=tWQ+MfSOJZrFtBL7EmDrU9j50Gvk8KDMxsRGMYziiAXupT8cjKvFsdhWBV1lAPo4Xe 3TU8PiVgjlfBbW84NncuSJzdUK63VBLUMmH9u6OU5n5bXQPvBEeuxERKhZ5/ihkmW6qZ I6mdFdLOUJPVvZkI57s2goQLRcmqEtoQaAW2JurDOfBfI9v9AH+Ag1D6Pi9OXwNNg7ll UmcJhqwdM2BoouuFFBlYW4ahyFGNyMPD5BALdjCwMk8qCFYhoihOF/OUBM+lHk3b4yYS 1Y4CE1T9q5xzBJePTmQZjSOdEibA3N+frKnXUDFrJEnnAz17CjKQwMsQA0k0Em0K9cx0 CLrg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:organization:autocrypt :content-language:from:references:cc:to:subject:user-agent :mime-version:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-id:precedence :date:message-id:dkim-signature; bh=GiPeZhxJtGJ8quf69kDStSSY+XUu4EI97FvqlN+T3ow=; fh=zbAVJ8+tLfb3Uvb6KdxQ5u2+x6oeL6qEyqSVwdBt5c8=; b=Jm5gQ+/KRXOpJGSxWYSIV863jP9hIJS976HFN5H4vn1XAl98yCNK4yo8V8Xo+vqJrF Tj6gydjxYHJfLB6/mBliRDKye9z2O6ZALSHInp0sgd9ed+59pIC8ry0FOib7uFHawacs TAv4To+gTaSxWrbl0shNwft501cWYvO5AiotPM+OPvdoDlTvkwHpVQSajy19smzJsbmb NfPq8B5mxho2WyqfEDuKbfKfRe8G41MYg2UoTdSCgJ0N/wrDTu1sYYI96p5MY1lX0gkW gaG5MHN4irF8zqQtJszEdMWD95pyI6hKI1TxfADk9OIFl1/c+P/jbhBLl7sEopUO10hV +15g==; dara=google.com ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=fYAy+JWd; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=redhat.com dkim=pass dkdomain=redhat.com dmarc=pass fromdomain=redhat.com); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-202784-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-202784-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from sv.mirrors.kernel.org (sv.mirrors.kernel.org. [139.178.88.99]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 41be03b00d2f7-6c359e09c52si9862982a12.289.2024.06.05.07.52.21 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 05 Jun 2024 07:52:21 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-202784-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) client-ip=139.178.88.99; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=fYAy+JWd; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=redhat.com dkim=pass dkdomain=redhat.com dmarc=pass fromdomain=redhat.com); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-202784-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-202784-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sv.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB88E2860CC for ; Wed, 5 Jun 2024 14:42:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA42C22064; Wed, 5 Jun 2024 14:42:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="fYAy+JWd" Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 288FF1B5AA for ; Wed, 5 Jun 2024 14:42:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717598534; cv=none; b=lVI867GZjQf4CWdC3kp/u18+wK7MFZqHX7dail61baPnaR7kBp4G0O8IibRpKw9N3wuokv/Z5+hpEtlcVYY6LHyXnOxI3kUpmPaxuWnTmn/1QntbzIkdbSORZxuGQiRY/b31UBeKInWMxuz7lTUI8W3qEoI3RRyQEN0IXdbUNjY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717598534; c=relaxed/simple; bh=K28g+f/D/gr3rfNCKVUw18hsV2Ij+fYu4fPgJUBJ5FA=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=E2Aky34vYU78EkYdUEsfeL4HAWoFyAL4JZL+wIFwiq87uA+HajGRFp9vJrGqdwd0l7eHp9bu9CyP6BAcoh4/J8IWsVEUYcUEZlT2UvIA35A4J3w/sMEhnTtfQK+0+tyAb/pq37bsKfpN1ztIl/H5cy9qJ2heS1pNxdNwlGOuRhA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=fYAy+JWd; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1717598532; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:autocrypt:autocrypt; bh=GiPeZhxJtGJ8quf69kDStSSY+XUu4EI97FvqlN+T3ow=; b=fYAy+JWdsO18bSXwthFpBbtdQEQ+srvrjlI/IMuO4iLiQdRomPVvql+YmRZcJ6Ycyxsylh fMauIMExerHxQMg9w1MuNVMrSV4hhPTdzEaRDHgAUhA3ClcGSLRKaFx0z48652E12vJQrJ thgNW6uYAxTlR6m1GvXvsCbsbK8XgXw= Received: from mail-wr1-f72.google.com (mail-wr1-f72.google.com [209.85.221.72]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-221-_r4441GTM3eRUobx8sVtbQ-1; Wed, 05 Jun 2024 10:42:10 -0400 X-MC-Unique: _r4441GTM3eRUobx8sVtbQ-1 Received: by mail-wr1-f72.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-35dcde1be6cso1573216f8f.1 for ; Wed, 05 Jun 2024 07:42:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1717598527; x=1718203327; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:organization:autocrypt :content-language:from:references:cc:to:subject:user-agent :mime-version:date:message-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=GiPeZhxJtGJ8quf69kDStSSY+XUu4EI97FvqlN+T3ow=; b=pQBA0BF05ThOC3mwHtQNK3BWHN2gP5x6XQ/+dP42pRfNIHCrSnxh9g2iF3JYkagp/B FeRBehlbM6dCnBpyLh8t8wPWUizi1l+smHY+XF0sJADEn0afK2xJMKDgQEm3P2CpJLZw /ZS1X/tDjOKI5V9jFHBk+0+3f5hWNK0YBI2kVyspVS3qlAYgYV/hGPHVdd7+R5XXfMZU U5PeesU1mlWnM5Cs9IQIt7SQ6JmaGtk00cfCiOQiG/vWa9yO/Fiwtx5WOQntF+ueuQnE yfEN7xdDsUc1SW2tDuNYxSxkSPaXMLp/mBVAud6kTmZU9A+t1LsoCzcnX+Vj+/gimqn6 tZgg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVMJFiXE++khewSNAGBtIa7sujm0uib/kbx0HY9kzBffwsFuUjCqS2daB3grj0K7AuLrXGmqDpDQXIAXvp5pw+5B5b0it8unMiPN8R5 X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzdGynWVYhZw4hSmf5bV+A7adzpjCasuqwn3a97k+uEXfjaOT9D nOZYa6+R8A2ESxkuy7EqBk8kerBHxCJ7dool/cc4O1NqTpkEW/Pi+EwhX7jjcIxWq0wNM5cAw0E p7FwAZ45fYwQdLq6OK5sCdtX5WfDWSiN1oqN5oODo2BMswot7BROhexdIRd7eVA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:d51:b0:355:3cf:49b1 with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-35e84070fedmr2059936f8f.19.1717598526918; Wed, 05 Jun 2024 07:42:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:d51:b0:355:3cf:49b1 with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-35e84070fedmr2059919f8f.19.1717598526491; Wed, 05 Jun 2024 07:42:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2003:cb:c706:3100:19a8:d898:8e69:6aff? (p200300cbc706310019a8d8988e696aff.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:cb:c706:3100:19a8:d898:8e69:6aff]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-35dd04d9c89sm14739988f8f.60.2024.06.05.07.42.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 05 Jun 2024 07:42:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2024 16:42:04 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next] mm: huge_memory: fix misused mapping_large_folio_support() for anon folios To: Zi Yan , ran xiaokai Cc: 21cnbao@gmail.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, mhocko@kernel.org, v-songbaohua@oppo.com, xu.xin16@zte.com.cn, yang.yang29@zte.com.cn References: <20240605095406.891512-1-ranxiaokai627@163.com> From: David Hildenbrand Content-Language: en-US Autocrypt: addr=david@redhat.com; keydata= xsFNBFXLn5EBEAC+zYvAFJxCBY9Tr1xZgcESmxVNI/0ffzE/ZQOiHJl6mGkmA1R7/uUpiCjJ dBrn+lhhOYjjNefFQou6478faXE6o2AhmebqT4KiQoUQFV4R7y1KMEKoSyy8hQaK1umALTdL QZLQMzNE74ap+GDK0wnacPQFpcG1AE9RMq3aeErY5tujekBS32jfC/7AnH7I0v1v1TbbK3Gp XNeiN4QroO+5qaSr0ID2sz5jtBLRb15RMre27E1ImpaIv2Jw8NJgW0k/D1RyKCwaTsgRdwuK Kx/Y91XuSBdz0uOyU/S8kM1+ag0wvsGlpBVxRR/xw/E8M7TEwuCZQArqqTCmkG6HGcXFT0V9 PXFNNgV5jXMQRwU0O/ztJIQqsE5LsUomE//bLwzj9IVsaQpKDqW6TAPjcdBDPLHvriq7kGjt WhVhdl0qEYB8lkBEU7V2Yb+SYhmhpDrti9Fq1EsmhiHSkxJcGREoMK/63r9WLZYI3+4W2rAc UucZa4OT27U5ZISjNg3Ev0rxU5UH2/pT4wJCfxwocmqaRr6UYmrtZmND89X0KigoFD/XSeVv jwBRNjPAubK9/k5NoRrYqztM9W6sJqrH8+UWZ1Idd/DdmogJh0gNC0+N42Za9yBRURfIdKSb B3JfpUqcWwE7vUaYrHG1nw54pLUoPG6sAA7Mehl3nd4pZUALHwARAQABzSREYXZpZCBIaWxk ZW5icmFuZCA8ZGF2aWRAcmVkaGF0LmNvbT7CwZgEEwEIAEICGwMGCwkIBwMCBhUIAgkKCwQW AgMBAh4BAheAAhkBFiEEG9nKrXNcTDpGDfzKTd4Q9wD/g1oFAl8Ox4kFCRKpKXgACgkQTd4Q 9wD/g1oHcA//a6Tj7SBNjFNM1iNhWUo1lxAja0lpSodSnB2g4FCZ4R61SBR4l/psBL73xktp rDHrx4aSpwkRP6Epu6mLvhlfjmkRG4OynJ5HG1gfv7RJJfnUdUM1z5kdS8JBrOhMJS2c/gPf wv1TGRq2XdMPnfY2o0CxRqpcLkx4vBODvJGl2mQyJF/gPepdDfcT8/PY9BJ7FL6Hrq1gnAo4 3Iv9qV0JiT2wmZciNyYQhmA1V6dyTRiQ4YAc31zOo2IM+xisPzeSHgw3ONY/XhYvfZ9r7W1l pNQdc2G+o4Di9NPFHQQhDw3YTRR1opJaTlRDzxYxzU6ZnUUBghxt9cwUWTpfCktkMZiPSDGd KgQBjnweV2jw9UOTxjb4LXqDjmSNkjDdQUOU69jGMUXgihvo4zhYcMX8F5gWdRtMR7DzW/YE BgVcyxNkMIXoY1aYj6npHYiNQesQlqjU6azjbH70/SXKM5tNRplgW8TNprMDuntdvV9wNkFs 9TyM02V5aWxFfI42+aivc4KEw69SE9KXwC7FSf5wXzuTot97N9Phj/Z3+jx443jo2NR34XgF 89cct7wJMjOF7bBefo0fPPZQuIma0Zym71cP61OP/i11ahNye6HGKfxGCOcs5wW9kRQEk8P9 M/k2wt3mt/fCQnuP/mWutNPt95w9wSsUyATLmtNrwccz63XOwU0EVcufkQEQAOfX3n0g0fZz Bgm/S2zF/kxQKCEKP8ID+Vz8sy2GpDvveBq4H2Y34XWsT1zLJdvqPI4af4ZSMxuerWjXbVWb T6d4odQIG0fKx4F8NccDqbgHeZRNajXeeJ3R7gAzvWvQNLz4piHrO/B4tf8svmRBL0ZB5P5A 2uhdwLU3NZuK22zpNn4is87BPWF8HhY0L5fafgDMOqnf4guJVJPYNPhUFzXUbPqOKOkL8ojk CXxkOFHAbjstSK5Ca3fKquY3rdX3DNo+EL7FvAiw1mUtS+5GeYE+RMnDCsVFm/C7kY8c2d0G NWkB9pJM5+mnIoFNxy7YBcldYATVeOHoY4LyaUWNnAvFYWp08dHWfZo9WCiJMuTfgtH9tc75 7QanMVdPt6fDK8UUXIBLQ2TWr/sQKE9xtFuEmoQGlE1l6bGaDnnMLcYu+Asp3kDT0w4zYGsx 5r6XQVRH4+5N6eHZiaeYtFOujp5n+pjBaQK7wUUjDilPQ5QMzIuCL4YjVoylWiBNknvQWBXS lQCWmavOT9sttGQXdPCC5ynI+1ymZC1ORZKANLnRAb0NH/UCzcsstw2TAkFnMEbo9Zu9w7Kv AxBQXWeXhJI9XQssfrf4Gusdqx8nPEpfOqCtbbwJMATbHyqLt7/oz/5deGuwxgb65pWIzufa N7eop7uh+6bezi+rugUI+w6DABEBAAHCwXwEGAEIACYCGwwWIQQb2cqtc1xMOkYN/MpN3hD3 AP+DWgUCXw7HsgUJEqkpoQAKCRBN3hD3AP+DWrrpD/4qS3dyVRxDcDHIlmguXjC1Q5tZTwNB boaBTPHSy/Nksu0eY7x6HfQJ3xajVH32Ms6t1trDQmPx2iP5+7iDsb7OKAb5eOS8h+BEBDeq 3ecsQDv0fFJOA9ag5O3LLNk+3x3q7e0uo06XMaY7UHS341ozXUUI7wC7iKfoUTv03iO9El5f XpNMx/YrIMduZ2+nd9Di7o5+KIwlb2mAB9sTNHdMrXesX8eBL6T9b+MZJk+mZuPxKNVfEQMQ a5SxUEADIPQTPNvBewdeI80yeOCrN+Zzwy/Mrx9EPeu59Y5vSJOx/z6OUImD/GhX7Xvkt3kq Er5KTrJz3++B6SH9pum9PuoE/k+nntJkNMmQpR4MCBaV/J9gIOPGodDKnjdng+mXliF3Ptu6 3oxc2RCyGzTlxyMwuc2U5Q7KtUNTdDe8T0uE+9b8BLMVQDDfJjqY0VVqSUwImzTDLX9S4g/8 kC4HRcclk8hpyhY2jKGluZO0awwTIMgVEzmTyBphDg/Gx7dZU1Xf8HFuE+UZ5UDHDTnwgv7E th6RC9+WrhDNspZ9fJjKWRbveQgUFCpe1sa77LAw+XFrKmBHXp9ZVIe90RMe2tRL06BGiRZr jPrnvUsUUsjRoRNJjKKA/REq+sAnhkNPPZ/NNMjaZ5b8Tovi8C0tmxiCHaQYqj7G2rgnT0kt WNyWQQ== Organization: Red Hat In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 05.06.24 16:08, Zi Yan wrote: > On 5 Jun 2024, at 2:54, ran xiaokai wrote: > >>> On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 5:47?PM wrote: >>>> >>>> From: Ran Xiaokai >>>> >>>> When I did a large folios split test, a WARNING >>>> "[ 5059.122759][ T166] Cannot split file folio to non-0 order" >>>> was triggered. But my test cases are only for anonmous folios. >>>> while mapping_large_folio_support() is only reasonable for page >>>> cache folios. >>>> >>>> In split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(), the folio passed to >>>> mapping_large_folio_support() maybe anonmous folio. The >>>> folio_test_anon() check is missing. So the split of the anonmous THP >>>> is failed. This is also the same for shmem_mapping(). We'd better add >>>> a check for both. But the shmem_mapping() in __split_huge_page() is >>>> not involved, as for anonmous folios, the end parameter is set to -1, so >>>> (head[i].index >= end) is always false. shmem_mapping() is not called. >>>> >>>> Using /sys/kernel/debug/split_huge_pages to verify this, with this >>>> patch, large anon THP is successfully split and the warning is ceased. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Ran Xiaokai >>>> Cc: xu xin >>>> Cc: Yang Yang >>>> --- >>>> mm/huge_memory.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------ >>>> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c >>>> index 317de2afd371..4c9c7e5ea20c 100644 >>>> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c >>>> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c >>>> @@ -3009,31 +3009,33 @@ int split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(struct page *page, struct list_head *list, >>>> if (new_order >= folio_order(folio)) >>>> return -EINVAL; >>>> >>>> - /* Cannot split anonymous THP to order-1 */ >>>> - if (new_order == 1 && folio_test_anon(folio)) { >>>> - VM_WARN_ONCE(1, "Cannot split to order-1 folio"); >>>> - return -EINVAL; >>>> - } >>>> - >>>> if (new_order) { >>>> /* Only swapping a whole PMD-mapped folio is supported */ >>>> if (folio_test_swapcache(folio)) >>>> return -EINVAL; >>>> - /* Split shmem folio to non-zero order not supported */ >>>> - if (shmem_mapping(folio->mapping)) { >>>> - VM_WARN_ONCE(1, >>>> - "Cannot split shmem folio to non-0 order"); >>>> - return -EINVAL; >>>> - } >>>> - /* No split if the file system does not support large folio */ >>>> - if (!mapping_large_folio_support(folio->mapping)) { >>>> - VM_WARN_ONCE(1, >>>> - "Cannot split file folio to non-0 order"); >>>> - return -EINVAL; >>>> + >>>> + if (folio_test_anon(folio)) { >>>> + /* Cannot split anonymous THP to order-1 */ >>>> + if (new_order == 1) { >>>> + VM_WARN_ONCE(1, "Cannot split to order-1 folio"); >>>> + return -EINVAL; >>>> + } >>>> + } else { >>>> + /* Split shmem folio to non-zero order not supported */ >>>> + if (shmem_mapping(folio->mapping)) { >>>> + VM_WARN_ONCE(1, >>>> + "Cannot split shmem folio to non-0 order"); >>>> + return -EINVAL; >>>> + } >>>> + /* No split if the file system does not support large folio */ >>>> + if (!mapping_large_folio_support(folio->mapping)) { >>>> + VM_WARN_ONCE(1, >>>> + "Cannot split file folio to non-0 order"); >>>> + return -EINVAL; >>>> + } >>> >>> Am I missing something? if file system doesn't support large folio, >>> how could the large folio start to exist from the first place while its >>> mapping points to a file which doesn't support large folio? >> >> I think it is the CONFIG_READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS case. >> khugepaged will try to collapse read-only file-backed pages to 2M THP. > > Can you add this information to the commit log in your next version? Can we also add that as a comment to that function, like "Note that we might still have THPs in such mappings due to CONFIG_READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS. But in that case, the mapping does not actually support large folios properly. "Or sth. like that. -- Cheers, David / dhildenb