Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-202890-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2024 18:12:36 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@amd.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>, x86@kernel.org,
	Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>,
	linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/8] hwmon: (k10temp) Check return value of
 amd_smn_read()
Message-ID: <20240605161236.GIZmCOdP-CRPJ8-3sY@fat_crate.local>
References: <20240523-fix-smn-bad-read-v3-0-aa44c622de39@amd.com>
 <20240523-fix-smn-bad-read-v3-3-aa44c622de39@amd.com>
 <20240605122012.GXZmBX_KFQArXB9Lar@fat_crate.local>
 <7a7c2f41-1608-4348-9183-d99aaa51398e@amd.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <7a7c2f41-1608-4348-9183-d99aaa51398e@amd.com>

On Wed, Jun 05, 2024 at 09:41:51AM -0400, Yazen Ghannam wrote:
> I agree that patches 1-3 are not stable-worthy on their own. But I think
> patch 4 is, and it requires 1-3 to avoid build errors.

Which of the rules in the first section of
Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst apply for patch 4?

Because I don't see it.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette