Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-203233-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2024 00:08:10 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] spi: Refactor spi_stop_queue()
Message-ID: <ZmDTuqMTR-KiUyVO@smile.fi.intel.com>
References: <20240510204945.2581944-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20240510204945.2581944-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo

On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 11:49:45PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> The refactoring makes code less verbose and easier to read.
> Besides that the binary size is also reduced, which sounds
> like a win-win case:
> 
>   add/remove: 0/1 grow/shrink: 2/2 up/down: 210/-226 (-16)
>   Function                            old     new   delta
>   spi_destroy_queue                    42     156    +114
>   spi_controller_suspend              101     197     +96
>   spi_unregister_controller           346     319     -27
>   spi_register_controller            1834    1794     -40
>   spi_stop_queue                      159       -    -159
>   Total: Before=49230, After=49214, chg -0.03%

Hmm... Other more recent patches went through, is this lost in cracks?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko