Received: by 2002:ab2:6309:0:b0:1fb:d597:ff75 with SMTP id s9csp197112lqt; Thu, 6 Jun 2024 00:18:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=3; AJvYcCVuroBoWh7AKehbiaIaZJw0s+gi+GOB7ekFSjtDQJUDqIOxrzmxe6v9VjgZwdGAxTSg00NcyD+5Nv6Rh7XDOmOX1V192HqQiqfJ4pLR5w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IErBD89Uv5EbBPkeH3CFK3DUPrWdoQfza5qxoPYG2DbgvtUpbjGPtKLXAAQpwbNWSlo30P8 X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:2c5:b0:440:2214:9251 with SMTP id d75a77b69052e-4402b6e8a93mr46096381cf.59.1717658325482; Thu, 06 Jun 2024 00:18:45 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; t=1717658325; cv=pass; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=0roiD36XKwp7sX9LSNiz8tBXHsb9FjMi688sO7166Smi2u+fbCNx2QwAhxC5xMmMnr x711R3LWiED98bCkaSY2MzJIzlPqUzrFepVVmYXSzZIX5RUqNqq7I4OV9OGTpLiwkAT3 QE0FcSZFI/SOTJs9mRG9WvhNZQwyzP67hogFRkV4bmdbiGiH6i8D1w7wtdAbEVIcU0dG 8Jcxgao59q8jHsYlu4LqHhZ1bfETliHvcOuvLNsysArnqH0vAdDym20Y8VMRzEPiHgqo exYkAedh0jtcnqRhCpq5j0EDIoXNKyrQBaD6MsljBrswRazhmWV0rIvDpwijNW06ZwZu zGpw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:organization:autocrypt :content-language:from:references:cc:to:subject:user-agent :mime-version:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-id:precedence :date:message-id:dkim-signature; bh=dX72FIZSO83pY1hyr/Pb+gOr6i7pkZCz4BjYbnrHA0M=; fh=6v4alwqS+POaXJMS3eHSnyKTmZq0cXIprXT6hBUnWuc=; b=LJ4vhMPZ2Hb5t6Ln9OEjJFDRh4/DcAPZZuQ+nHObyP0ECIRsHKL4X4tvL/Dkpe/dWF DvP+P/Auo5Lc00EAbVDYZ3fDRGbD2PQ+PPzYoOTIRYjZC6HP8MTJ8WUwFUz0CQP+yNeF +AfjhsUN0Mo4kEOTUm7+bTKfGKwvH0Bor0C2gLgQUplGKGQhwvyplLRR+7r9+FtazDmY 9LU+BFL8A5kSxyB1Yk5BxWoHLq1/SmLlxqpdtkecmhBgusnTyNmjTA1XgPSolBxmNqHQ RVK0bzs+xS0efyLeVAN41N16HRnJtu2+KfjsBb98yRyoZgp0d3jdIzx4OCfD4YwY8FUt ME3Q==; dara=google.com ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=H7fwqK5r; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=redhat.com dkim=pass dkdomain=redhat.com dmarc=pass fromdomain=redhat.com); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-203714-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-203714-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from ny.mirrors.kernel.org (ny.mirrors.kernel.org. [2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d75a77b69052e-44038b41542si9255011cf.506.2024.06.06.00.18.45 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 06 Jun 2024 00:18:45 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-203714-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=H7fwqK5r; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=redhat.com dkim=pass dkdomain=redhat.com dmarc=pass fromdomain=redhat.com); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-203714-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-203714-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ny.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1F2E1C21FCF for ; Thu, 6 Jun 2024 07:18:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BD2B13AA42; Thu, 6 Jun 2024 07:18:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="H7fwqK5r" Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 353A333F7 for ; Thu, 6 Jun 2024 07:18:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717658318; cv=none; b=kV4byppHzb1iLUkrb1CzjIQlu0qjQzibYfYvRWr3B7ci8dLt7vJzxAcrOiPeYQvpdYkFDG3WwnJHdB2lR8HMA0g0Q61w5FfYLjLN6L2WpxPiPMHVKD8b+l13sK8G1o4ZsoJZAGIlODB0kOLdaE7lX/pDyCBRV2OCAYXoRoDcFEU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717658318; c=relaxed/simple; bh=R7ueCAy6fut9uiz4e8YxqXFLF/ZPouJCucHBSXavmKw=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=A2xLpybReW+OS7JSiVAc3y+rFI9LPEXyGiPN9PC9WV1Tkd8W/N5kb8t+jPJ1o0FLwVGMJF7viv55MPikjXXKO++0dMyDn1FmRwkDfQo/a95alX06u1rvA3h/N1z8lrDp3qx1KF/q45HWh7XVUbAI2yNC6qBN8+qraei/Hc9FmsU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=H7fwqK5r; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1717658316; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:autocrypt:autocrypt; bh=dX72FIZSO83pY1hyr/Pb+gOr6i7pkZCz4BjYbnrHA0M=; b=H7fwqK5rAMw0epZ/jg43H5jqXlQGdrXHhEemLG7UPWr9QkQI6sGasEjzMH/tW6UBGyUWuj wGBHF9QiVIlJ6Xs/jomQkM5Ap2BMAJxMYtjApopoCE6q8FZIkOQ3YkewSKh3kKV2mM46p8 WdBPFdvL3iDahR+zklE14ctL+EoZ72E= Received: from mail-wm1-f69.google.com (mail-wm1-f69.google.com [209.85.128.69]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-659-T3KeZaYkM8-d-2TkAA7PlA-1; Thu, 06 Jun 2024 03:18:30 -0400 X-MC-Unique: T3KeZaYkM8-d-2TkAA7PlA-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f69.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-42159c69a28so6003905e9.1 for ; Thu, 06 Jun 2024 00:18:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1717658309; x=1718263109; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:organization:autocrypt :content-language:from:references:cc:to:subject:user-agent :mime-version:date:message-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=dX72FIZSO83pY1hyr/Pb+gOr6i7pkZCz4BjYbnrHA0M=; b=DsMy6c8SCH20rv1NVAWTlpFb1vLDWi1YfPR9Ouirx8N8PJ9x7AQ6RT22Xojm32UHbA A7OWqhLgyTc15k64x6BIhCy6+FrQzxxN2Nt9dsLN/iqC1YxCDCTJaHAzuWopU3IQfjg+ 5atY3qj3onb+8uiwokqKLROgM0PnpHW9Gxz711h6ByoGqNKersbq0ojTf7J+ZZS6/nSr QKcS4eGirV7v2P4oGG3l/W8XhedKoRAmvA/SneX4YWKGT1bHpYIpwLP7N6PGCIycT2Jy vpVwY2biKuv4r28jrXKo9ZsmInj/sxjVDwTQoQ3x9w8iDUT1JT9AHiBzpfbkIxejqhWT 9W6g== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCV49nlvK/zwB4ft5UUJenzSFMA0fDU96XsQxzxmkaGBerQ7DEuOO/sMoaYZPq5imhIQrmRlY/l+dS7+5p+68Zf6giRuCEXhq9LxQwT7 X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwMIqT5gEOvc3xsoD7XhjR/Cu/QVI2zJlhejGPlH47aLJMRIPbh 4IwPFe61jk2q6dhE0K6v9aaViSLUMDztHGZHJ8vEsyHSo70BtM26LJH7TZIG1k8VPj1ae/J97hs ehgMOu6iVcsnWXWyLoCg6Xxo/kH5gtXJtje0XzAtjzi87rrAgiUVeHJ7njxAnXg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:5492:b0:421:2adb:dd6a with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-421562cf75dmr43868885e9.7.1717658308875; Thu, 06 Jun 2024 00:18:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:5492:b0:421:2adb:dd6a with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-421562cf75dmr43868655e9.7.1717658308440; Thu, 06 Jun 2024 00:18:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2003:cb:c710:8800:a73c:ec5b:c02c:5e0b? (p200300cbc7108800a73cec5bc02c5e0b.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:cb:c710:8800:a73c:ec5b:c02c:5e0b]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-35ef5d69917sm768122f8f.62.2024.06.06.00.18.27 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 06 Jun 2024 00:18:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2024 09:18:26 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next] mm: huge_memory: fix misused mapping_large_folio_support() for anon folios To: Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com> Cc: Zi Yan , ran xiaokai , akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, mhocko@kernel.org, v-songbaohua@oppo.com, xu.xin16@zte.com.cn, yang.yang29@zte.com.cn References: <20240605095406.891512-1-ranxiaokai627@163.com> From: David Hildenbrand Content-Language: en-US Autocrypt: addr=david@redhat.com; keydata= xsFNBFXLn5EBEAC+zYvAFJxCBY9Tr1xZgcESmxVNI/0ffzE/ZQOiHJl6mGkmA1R7/uUpiCjJ dBrn+lhhOYjjNefFQou6478faXE6o2AhmebqT4KiQoUQFV4R7y1KMEKoSyy8hQaK1umALTdL QZLQMzNE74ap+GDK0wnacPQFpcG1AE9RMq3aeErY5tujekBS32jfC/7AnH7I0v1v1TbbK3Gp XNeiN4QroO+5qaSr0ID2sz5jtBLRb15RMre27E1ImpaIv2Jw8NJgW0k/D1RyKCwaTsgRdwuK Kx/Y91XuSBdz0uOyU/S8kM1+ag0wvsGlpBVxRR/xw/E8M7TEwuCZQArqqTCmkG6HGcXFT0V9 PXFNNgV5jXMQRwU0O/ztJIQqsE5LsUomE//bLwzj9IVsaQpKDqW6TAPjcdBDPLHvriq7kGjt WhVhdl0qEYB8lkBEU7V2Yb+SYhmhpDrti9Fq1EsmhiHSkxJcGREoMK/63r9WLZYI3+4W2rAc UucZa4OT27U5ZISjNg3Ev0rxU5UH2/pT4wJCfxwocmqaRr6UYmrtZmND89X0KigoFD/XSeVv jwBRNjPAubK9/k5NoRrYqztM9W6sJqrH8+UWZ1Idd/DdmogJh0gNC0+N42Za9yBRURfIdKSb B3JfpUqcWwE7vUaYrHG1nw54pLUoPG6sAA7Mehl3nd4pZUALHwARAQABzSREYXZpZCBIaWxk ZW5icmFuZCA8ZGF2aWRAcmVkaGF0LmNvbT7CwZgEEwEIAEICGwMGCwkIBwMCBhUIAgkKCwQW AgMBAh4BAheAAhkBFiEEG9nKrXNcTDpGDfzKTd4Q9wD/g1oFAl8Ox4kFCRKpKXgACgkQTd4Q 9wD/g1oHcA//a6Tj7SBNjFNM1iNhWUo1lxAja0lpSodSnB2g4FCZ4R61SBR4l/psBL73xktp rDHrx4aSpwkRP6Epu6mLvhlfjmkRG4OynJ5HG1gfv7RJJfnUdUM1z5kdS8JBrOhMJS2c/gPf wv1TGRq2XdMPnfY2o0CxRqpcLkx4vBODvJGl2mQyJF/gPepdDfcT8/PY9BJ7FL6Hrq1gnAo4 3Iv9qV0JiT2wmZciNyYQhmA1V6dyTRiQ4YAc31zOo2IM+xisPzeSHgw3ONY/XhYvfZ9r7W1l pNQdc2G+o4Di9NPFHQQhDw3YTRR1opJaTlRDzxYxzU6ZnUUBghxt9cwUWTpfCktkMZiPSDGd KgQBjnweV2jw9UOTxjb4LXqDjmSNkjDdQUOU69jGMUXgihvo4zhYcMX8F5gWdRtMR7DzW/YE BgVcyxNkMIXoY1aYj6npHYiNQesQlqjU6azjbH70/SXKM5tNRplgW8TNprMDuntdvV9wNkFs 9TyM02V5aWxFfI42+aivc4KEw69SE9KXwC7FSf5wXzuTot97N9Phj/Z3+jx443jo2NR34XgF 89cct7wJMjOF7bBefo0fPPZQuIma0Zym71cP61OP/i11ahNye6HGKfxGCOcs5wW9kRQEk8P9 M/k2wt3mt/fCQnuP/mWutNPt95w9wSsUyATLmtNrwccz63XOwU0EVcufkQEQAOfX3n0g0fZz Bgm/S2zF/kxQKCEKP8ID+Vz8sy2GpDvveBq4H2Y34XWsT1zLJdvqPI4af4ZSMxuerWjXbVWb T6d4odQIG0fKx4F8NccDqbgHeZRNajXeeJ3R7gAzvWvQNLz4piHrO/B4tf8svmRBL0ZB5P5A 2uhdwLU3NZuK22zpNn4is87BPWF8HhY0L5fafgDMOqnf4guJVJPYNPhUFzXUbPqOKOkL8ojk CXxkOFHAbjstSK5Ca3fKquY3rdX3DNo+EL7FvAiw1mUtS+5GeYE+RMnDCsVFm/C7kY8c2d0G NWkB9pJM5+mnIoFNxy7YBcldYATVeOHoY4LyaUWNnAvFYWp08dHWfZo9WCiJMuTfgtH9tc75 7QanMVdPt6fDK8UUXIBLQ2TWr/sQKE9xtFuEmoQGlE1l6bGaDnnMLcYu+Asp3kDT0w4zYGsx 5r6XQVRH4+5N6eHZiaeYtFOujp5n+pjBaQK7wUUjDilPQ5QMzIuCL4YjVoylWiBNknvQWBXS lQCWmavOT9sttGQXdPCC5ynI+1ymZC1ORZKANLnRAb0NH/UCzcsstw2TAkFnMEbo9Zu9w7Kv AxBQXWeXhJI9XQssfrf4Gusdqx8nPEpfOqCtbbwJMATbHyqLt7/oz/5deGuwxgb65pWIzufa N7eop7uh+6bezi+rugUI+w6DABEBAAHCwXwEGAEIACYCGwwWIQQb2cqtc1xMOkYN/MpN3hD3 AP+DWgUCXw7HsgUJEqkpoQAKCRBN3hD3AP+DWrrpD/4qS3dyVRxDcDHIlmguXjC1Q5tZTwNB boaBTPHSy/Nksu0eY7x6HfQJ3xajVH32Ms6t1trDQmPx2iP5+7iDsb7OKAb5eOS8h+BEBDeq 3ecsQDv0fFJOA9ag5O3LLNk+3x3q7e0uo06XMaY7UHS341ozXUUI7wC7iKfoUTv03iO9El5f XpNMx/YrIMduZ2+nd9Di7o5+KIwlb2mAB9sTNHdMrXesX8eBL6T9b+MZJk+mZuPxKNVfEQMQ a5SxUEADIPQTPNvBewdeI80yeOCrN+Zzwy/Mrx9EPeu59Y5vSJOx/z6OUImD/GhX7Xvkt3kq Er5KTrJz3++B6SH9pum9PuoE/k+nntJkNMmQpR4MCBaV/J9gIOPGodDKnjdng+mXliF3Ptu6 3oxc2RCyGzTlxyMwuc2U5Q7KtUNTdDe8T0uE+9b8BLMVQDDfJjqY0VVqSUwImzTDLX9S4g/8 kC4HRcclk8hpyhY2jKGluZO0awwTIMgVEzmTyBphDg/Gx7dZU1Xf8HFuE+UZ5UDHDTnwgv7E th6RC9+WrhDNspZ9fJjKWRbveQgUFCpe1sa77LAw+XFrKmBHXp9ZVIe90RMe2tRL06BGiRZr jPrnvUsUUsjRoRNJjKKA/REq+sAnhkNPPZ/NNMjaZ5b8Tovi8C0tmxiCHaQYqj7G2rgnT0kt WNyWQQ== Organization: Red Hat In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 06.06.24 03:34, Barry Song wrote: > On Thu, Jun 6, 2024 at 2:42 AM David Hildenbrand wrote: >> >> On 05.06.24 16:08, Zi Yan wrote: >>> On 5 Jun 2024, at 2:54, ran xiaokai wrote: >>> >>>>> On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 5:47?PM wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> From: Ran Xiaokai >>>>>> >>>>>> When I did a large folios split test, a WARNING >>>>>> "[ 5059.122759][ T166] Cannot split file folio to non-0 order" >>>>>> was triggered. But my test cases are only for anonmous folios. >>>>>> while mapping_large_folio_support() is only reasonable for page >>>>>> cache folios. >>>>>> >>>>>> In split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(), the folio passed to >>>>>> mapping_large_folio_support() maybe anonmous folio. The >>>>>> folio_test_anon() check is missing. So the split of the anonmous THP >>>>>> is failed. This is also the same for shmem_mapping(). We'd better add >>>>>> a check for both. But the shmem_mapping() in __split_huge_page() is >>>>>> not involved, as for anonmous folios, the end parameter is set to -1, so >>>>>> (head[i].index >= end) is always false. shmem_mapping() is not called. >>>>>> >>>>>> Using /sys/kernel/debug/split_huge_pages to verify this, with this >>>>>> patch, large anon THP is successfully split and the warning is ceased. >>>>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Ran Xiaokai >>>>>> Cc: xu xin >>>>>> Cc: Yang Yang >>>>>> --- >>>>>> mm/huge_memory.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------ >>>>>> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) >>>>>> >>>>>> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c >>>>>> index 317de2afd371..4c9c7e5ea20c 100644 >>>>>> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c >>>>>> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c >>>>>> @@ -3009,31 +3009,33 @@ int split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(struct page *page, struct list_head *list, >>>>>> if (new_order >= folio_order(folio)) >>>>>> return -EINVAL; >>>>>> >>>>>> - /* Cannot split anonymous THP to order-1 */ >>>>>> - if (new_order == 1 && folio_test_anon(folio)) { >>>>>> - VM_WARN_ONCE(1, "Cannot split to order-1 folio"); >>>>>> - return -EINVAL; >>>>>> - } >>>>>> - >>>>>> if (new_order) { >>>>>> /* Only swapping a whole PMD-mapped folio is supported */ >>>>>> if (folio_test_swapcache(folio)) >>>>>> return -EINVAL; >>>>>> - /* Split shmem folio to non-zero order not supported */ >>>>>> - if (shmem_mapping(folio->mapping)) { >>>>>> - VM_WARN_ONCE(1, >>>>>> - "Cannot split shmem folio to non-0 order"); >>>>>> - return -EINVAL; >>>>>> - } >>>>>> - /* No split if the file system does not support large folio */ >>>>>> - if (!mapping_large_folio_support(folio->mapping)) { >>>>>> - VM_WARN_ONCE(1, >>>>>> - "Cannot split file folio to non-0 order"); >>>>>> - return -EINVAL; >>>>>> + >>>>>> + if (folio_test_anon(folio)) { >>>>>> + /* Cannot split anonymous THP to order-1 */ >>>>>> + if (new_order == 1) { >>>>>> + VM_WARN_ONCE(1, "Cannot split to order-1 folio"); >>>>>> + return -EINVAL; >>>>>> + } >>>>>> + } else { >>>>>> + /* Split shmem folio to non-zero order not supported */ >>>>>> + if (shmem_mapping(folio->mapping)) { >>>>>> + VM_WARN_ONCE(1, >>>>>> + "Cannot split shmem folio to non-0 order"); >>>>>> + return -EINVAL; >>>>>> + } >>>>>> + /* No split if the file system does not support large folio */ >>>>>> + if (!mapping_large_folio_support(folio->mapping)) { >>>>>> + VM_WARN_ONCE(1, >>>>>> + "Cannot split file folio to non-0 order"); >>>>>> + return -EINVAL; >>>>>> + } >>>>> >>>>> Am I missing something? if file system doesn't support large folio, >>>>> how could the large folio start to exist from the first place while its >>>>> mapping points to a file which doesn't support large folio? >>>> >>>> I think it is the CONFIG_READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS case. >>>> khugepaged will try to collapse read-only file-backed pages to 2M THP. >>> >>> Can you add this information to the commit log in your next version? >> >> Can we also add that as a comment to that function, like "Note that we >> might still >> have THPs in such mappings due to CONFIG_READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS. But in >> that case, >> the mapping does not actually support large folios properly. >> "Or sth. like that. > > +1. Otherwise, the code appears quite confusing. > Would using "#ifdef" help to further clarify it? > > #ifdef CONFIG_READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS > if (!mapping_large_folio_support(folio->mapping)) { > .... > } if (IS_ENABLED()) ... Agreed. -- Cheers, David / dhildenb