Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 14:51:41 -0600
From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com, kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com,
       andi@firstfloor.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       akpm@linux-foundation.org, clameter@sgi.com, mel@csn.ul.ie
Subject: Re: [2.6.24-rc8-mm1][regression?] numactl --interleave=all doesn't
 works on memoryless node.
Message-Id: <20080205145141.ae658c12.pj@sgi.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.0.9999.0802051146300.5854@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
References: <20080202165054.F491.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com>
	<20080202090914.GA27723@one.firstfloor.org>
	<20080202180536.F494.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com>
	<1202149243.5028.61.camel@localhost>
	<20080205041755.3411b5cc.pj@sgi.com>
	<alpine.DEB.0.9999.0802051146300.5854@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Organization: SGI
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 845
Lines: 20

David wrote:
> The more alarming result of these remaps is in the MPOL_BIND case, as 
> we've talked about before.  The language in set_mempolicy(2):

You're diving into the middle of a rather involved discussion
we had on the other various patches proposed to extend the
interaction of mempolicy's with cpusets and hotplug.

I choose not to hijack this current thread with my rebuttal,
which you've seen before, of your points here.

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.940.382.4214
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/