Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763469AbYBEXir (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Feb 2008 18:38:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1763329AbYBEXii (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Feb 2008 18:38:38 -0500 Received: from smtp2.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.14]:52252 "EHLO smtp2.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1763321AbYBEXig (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Feb 2008 18:38:36 -0500 Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 15:37:52 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Rusty Russell Cc: adobriyan@sw.ru, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Whine about suspicious return values from module's ->init() hook Message-Id: <20080205153752.243d3b63.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <200802060948.11133.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> References: <20080204154215.GA26618@localhost.sw.ru> <200802051708.37349.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> <20080204222457.286b962f.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <200802060948.11133.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1482 Lines: 43 On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 09:48:10 +1100 Rusty Russell wrote: > On Tuesday 05 February 2008 17:24:57 Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 17:08:37 +1100 Rusty Russell > wrote: > > > On Tuesday 05 February 2008 14:53:18 Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > That risks killing previously-working setups. WARN_ON is sufficient. > > > > > > I disagree. WARN_ON is useful for developers, but they can handle > > > BUG_ON, too. > > > > For developers, BUG_ON has zero benefit relative to WARN_ON. > > > > For non-developers, BUG_ON has large disadvantages relative to WARN_ON. > > > > It's a no-brainer. > > For non-developers, WARN_ON is a noop. Oh.. Rusty. The mailing list and bugzilla are *full* of WARN_ON reports from testers. Your statement is empirically wrong. > For developers, WARN_ON is often a noop. And from developers. > BUG_ON() will make us fix it in return for short-term pain. Pain to our users and testers. People upon whom we are very dependent and to whom we are hugely indebted. People who I have to spend a lot of time defending from the likes of you! > WARN_ON() wont, > in return for less pain. It's mildly better than nothing, but not worth the > patch. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/