Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763130AbYBFAF6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Feb 2008 19:05:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758752AbYBFAFv (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Feb 2008 19:05:51 -0500 Received: from mail.contimak.com ([217.16.69.3]:46017 "EHLO on.net.mk" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758254AbYBFAFu (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Feb 2008 19:05:50 -0500 From: =?utf-8?b?0JTQsNC80ZjQsNC9INCT0LXQvtGA0LPQuNC10LLRgdC60Lg=?= Organization: =?utf-8?b?0KHQu9C+0LHQvtC00LXQvSDRgdC+0YTRgtCy0LXRgA==?= =?utf-8?b?INCc0LDQutC10LTQvtC90LjRmNCw?= To: "Kok, Auke" Subject: Re: PCIE ASPM support hangs my laptop pretty often Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 01:05:44 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 Cc: Greg KH , Arjan van de Ven , Shaohua Li , lkml , linux-pci References: <200802051840.05237.penguinista@mail.net.mk> <20080205185100.GA4633@kroah.com> <47A8CE10.4010807@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <47A8CE10.4010807@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200802060105.45363.penguinista@mail.net.mk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1409 Lines: 36 > >>> I've patched my kernel with the PCIe ASPM and after setting > >>> echo powersave > /sys/module/pcie_aspm/parameters/policy > >>> > >>> I started to experience random hangs of my laptop. > >>> Hardware info: > >>> Thinkpad x60s 1704-5UG > >> > >> the x60's chipset doesn't support ASPM properly afaik... bad idea. > > > > Well, the code shouldn't then cause a crash of the machine :) > > The user enabled it specifically (where it is disabled by default) > > ASPM has been crashing e1000(e), which is why I've recently merged a patch > to disable L1 ASPM for the onboard 82573 nic on those platforms. > > this new infrastructure should work in the default configuration - enabling > ASPM where this system leaves it disabled is expected to give problems > unless you know what you are doing. In my defense, the patch documentation didn't say it doesn't work with my hardware, nor that it hangs the chipset :) and the promised 1.3w surelly looked nice. So, are there any benefits of ASPM if I have it in the kernel but it's set to default? I got the impression that "default" means not much power savings? -- Damjan Georgievski Free Software Macedonia -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/