Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-205876-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2024 14:11:12 +0300
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
To: Martin Schiller <ms@dev.tdt.de>
Cc: martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com, hauke@hauke-m.de, andrew@lunn.ch,
	f.fainelli@gmail.com, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
	kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, robh@kernel.org,
	krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 04/13] net: dsa: lantiq_gswip: Don't manually
 call gswip_port_enable()
Message-ID: <20240607111112.tuilkvwektzohvrq@skbuf>
References: <20240606085234.565551-1-ms@dev.tdt.de>
 <20240606085234.565551-5-ms@dev.tdt.de>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20240606085234.565551-5-ms@dev.tdt.de>

On Thu, Jun 06, 2024 at 10:52:25AM +0200, Martin Schiller wrote:
> From: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
> 
> We don't need to manually call gswip_port_enable() from within
> gswip_setup() for the CPU port. DSA does this automatically for us.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
> ---

Not to mention the first thing in gswip_port_enable(), which is:

	if (!dsa_is_user_port(ds, port))
		return 0;

So the call is dead code anyway.