Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-206050-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
From: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
To: alx@kernel.org,
	linux-man@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@kernel.org,
	tglx@linutronix.de,
	mark.rutland@arm.com,
	ryan.roberts@arm.com,
	broonie@kernel.org,
	suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
	Anshuman.Khandual@arm.com,
	DeepakKumar.Mishra@arm.com,
	AneeshKumar.KizhakeVeetil@arm.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] signal(7) fixes
Date: Fri,  7 Jun 2024 18:01:17 +0530
Message-Id: <20240607123119.769044-1-dev.jain@arm.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

This is a follow-up to the following:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240607122319.768640-1-dev.jain@arm.com/

This series brings distinction between the set of blocked signals
represented in uc_sigmask, and the actual set of blocked signals. Also,
fix a wrong mention of sigprocmask(), and replace it with sigaction(). 

Dev Jain (2):
  signal.7: Clearly describe ucontext kernel dump to userspace
  signal.7: Fix wrong mention of sigprocmask

 man/man7/signal.7 | 12 ++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

-- 
2.34.1