Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-206766-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1;
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2024 23:20:05 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
To: Easwar Hariharan <eahariha@linux.microsoft.com>
Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org>, 
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] docs: i2c: summary: document use of inclusive
 language
Message-ID: <56qtono23q4couvjk4rdovqliujkcxjnvo7xrsgb3iturplmrw@o7jjxfklfr4c>
Mail-Followup-To: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>, 
	Easwar Hariharan <eahariha@linux.microsoft.com>, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org>, 
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20240607111726.12678-1-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
 <20240607111726.12678-5-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
 <dcd7adf8-bcb6-483b-859b-06e7b2831e23@linux.microsoft.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2pekpatlprr4tko4"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <dcd7adf8-bcb6-483b-859b-06e7b2831e23@linux.microsoft.com>


--2pekpatlprr4tko4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


> > +A **target** chip is a node that responds to communications when addre=
ssed
> > +by the controller. In Linux it is called a **client**. Client drivers =
are kept
>=20
> Are we continuing to use client instead of local target and remote target?

Nope, "client" is just the Linux word for "target". Like "adapter" for
"controller". Historic legacy. So, in a way "local client" and "remote
client" would also work to emphasize the distinction.

This document so far only talks about "remote targets". I noticed this a
few hours ago and concluded that another paragraph needs to be added
explaining that Linux can be a target as well. And that this is called a
"local target" while the other ones are "remote targets".

Makes sense?


--2pekpatlprr4tko4
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=Ql+c
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--2pekpatlprr4tko4--