Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-207875-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.199.223;
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 11:54:24 +0300
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Cc: Julien Stephan <jstephan@baylibre.com>,
	Louis Kuo <louis.kuo@mediatek.com>,
	Phi-Bang Nguyen <pnguyen@baylibre.com>,
	Andy Hsieh <andy.hsieh@mediatek.com>,
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	Florian Sylvestre <fsylvestre@baylibre.com>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
	Paul Elder <paul.elder@ideasonboard.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] dt-bindings: media: add mediatek ISP3.0 sensor
 interface
Message-ID: <20240610085424.GH26663@pendragon.ideasonboard.com>
References: <20240110141443.364655-1-jstephan@baylibre.com>
 <20240110141443.364655-2-jstephan@baylibre.com>
 <e0bf8667-cbb8-49ba-bb44-3edf93b019b8@linaro.org>
 <CAEHHSvYt-aqFahi=B_si=duJH8xDgy_9nndgR-P0+U5THX69uw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20240607144154.GD18479@pendragon.ideasonboard.com>
 <cf49fbb3-9de6-4e57-bc38-d720f76118a7@linaro.org>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <cf49fbb3-9de6-4e57-bc38-d720f76118a7@linaro.org>

Hi Krzysztof,

On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 09:54:03AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 07/06/2024 16:41, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 10:52:33AM +0200, Julien Stephan wrote:
> >> Le ven. 12 janv. 2024 à 08:32, Krzysztof Kozlowski a écrit :
> >>> On 10/01/2024 15:14, Julien Stephan wrote:
> 
> Eeeh? January?
> 
> ...
> 
> >>>
> >>>> +
> >>>> +          seninf: seninf@15040000 {
> >>>
> >>> Node names should be generic. See also an explanation and list of
> >>> examples (not exhaustive) in DT specification:
> >>> https://devicetree-specification.readthedocs.io/en/latest/chapter2-devicetree-basics.html#generic-names-recommendation
> > 
> > The seninf is (mostly) a set of MIPI CSI-2 receivers. Would you prefer
> > 'csi', 'mipi-csi', 'csi-2' or any other name ?
> 
> csi@ works for me
> 
> > There's also the camsv IP in the same series that needs a generic name.
> > I really don't know what to propose for it. Could you recommend
> > something that would make you happy ?
> 
> Sorry,that's almost half year old thread. Not present in my inbox.

I remember someone presenting a talk titled "Beginner Linux kernel
maintainer's toolbox" in Prague last year. The talk mentioned a tool
call b4. I highly recommend it ;-)

> > On a side note, that document lacks appropriate generic names for lots
> > of building blocks found in recent SoCs, it would be nice to get it
> > updated. You will eventually get better quality DT patches then :-)
> 
> The list grew recently, so just add something there. But it is okay if
> some name is not really generic, it's just recommendation.

OK, then I think we can go for 'csi' for seninf, and keep 'camsv'.

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart