Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-208194-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.80.249;
From: Fred Griffoul <fgriffo@amazon.co.uk>
To: <griffoul@gmail.com>
CC: Fred Griffoul <fgriffo@amazon.co.uk>, kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>, Waiman Long
	<longman@redhat.com>, Zefan Li <lizefan.x@bytedance.com>, Tejun Heo
	<tj@kernel.org>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Mark Rutland
	<mark.rutland@arm.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Oliver Upton
	<oliver.upton@linux.dev>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Ard Biesheuvel
	<ardb@kernel.org>, Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>, Ryan Roberts
	<ryan.roberts@arm.com>, Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>, "Jason
 Gunthorpe" <jgg@ziepe.ca>, Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>, Kevin Tian
	<kevin.tian@intel.com>, Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>, Stefan Hajnoczi
	<stefanha@redhat.com>, Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>, Ankit Agrawal
	<ankita@nvidia.com>, Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>, Ye Bin
	<yebin10@huawei.com>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	<cgroups@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v5 1/2] cgroup/cpuset: export cpuset_cpus_allowed()
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 12:57:07 +0000
Message-ID: <20240610125713.86750-2-fgriffo@amazon.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20240610125713.86750-1-fgriffo@amazon.co.uk>
References: <20240610125713.86750-1-fgriffo@amazon.co.uk>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain

A subsequent patch calls cpuset_cpus_allowed() in the vfio driver pci
code. Export the symbol to be able to build the vfio driver as a kernel
module.

This is not enough, however: when CONFIG_CPUSETS is _not_ defined
cpuset_cpus_allowed() is an inline function returning
task_cpu_possible_mask(). For the arm64 architecture this function is
also inline: it checks the arm64_mismatched_32bit_el0 static key and
calls system_32bit_el0_cpumask(). We need to export those symbols as
well.

Signed-off-by: Fred Griffoul <fgriffo@amazon.co.uk>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202406060731.L3NSR1Hy-lkp@intel.com/
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202406070659.pYu6zNrx-lkp@intel.com/
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202406101154.iaDyTRwZ-lkp@intel.com/

---
 arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 2 ++
 kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c         | 1 +
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
index 56583677c1f2..2f1de6343bee 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -127,6 +127,7 @@ static bool __read_mostly allow_mismatched_32bit_el0;
  * seen at least one CPU capable of 32-bit EL0.
  */
 DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(arm64_mismatched_32bit_el0);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(arm64_mismatched_32bit_el0);

 /*
  * Mask of CPUs supporting 32-bit EL0.
@@ -1614,6 +1615,7 @@ const struct cpumask *system_32bit_el0_cpumask(void)

 	return cpu_possible_mask;
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(system_32bit_el0_cpumask);

 static int __init parse_32bit_el0_param(char *str)
 {
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
index 4237c8748715..9fd56222aa4b 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
@@ -4764,6 +4764,7 @@ void cpuset_cpus_allowed(struct task_struct *tsk, struct cpumask *pmask)
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&callback_lock, flags);
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpuset_cpus_allowed);

 /**
  * cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback - final fallback before complete catastrophe.
--
2.40.1