Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-208235-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::3;
From: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 15:28:36 +0200
To: Daniel Xu <dxu@dxuuu.xyz>
Cc: shuah@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
	eddyz87@gmail.com, ast@kernel.org, olsajiri@gmail.com,
	quentin@isovalent.com, alan.maguire@oracle.com, acme@kernel.org,
	martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev,
	john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@google.com,
	haoluo@google.com, mykolal@fb.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 03/12] bpf: selftests: Fix fentry test kfunc
 prototypes
Message-ID: <Zmb_hJQqxi44Nj5B@krava>
References: <cover.1717881178.git.dxu@dxuuu.xyz>
 <1f493cb7a7e5349f99e2badf0880b75dd6681898.1717881178.git.dxu@dxuuu.xyz>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1f493cb7a7e5349f99e2badf0880b75dd6681898.1717881178.git.dxu@dxuuu.xyz>

On Sat, Jun 08, 2024 at 03:15:59PM -0600, Daniel Xu wrote:
> The prototypes in progs/get_func_ip_test.c were not in line with how the
> actual kfuncs are defined in net/bpf/test_run.c. This causes compilation
> errors when kfunc prototypes are generated from BTF.
> 
> Fix by aligning with actual kfunc definitions.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Xu <dxu@dxuuu.xyz>
> ---
>  .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/get_func_ip_test.c | 14 +++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/get_func_ip_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/get_func_ip_test.c
> index 8956eb78a226..a89596f7585d 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/get_func_ip_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/get_func_ip_test.c
> @@ -5,13 +5,13 @@
>  
>  char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
>  
> -extern const void bpf_fentry_test1 __ksym;
> -extern const void bpf_fentry_test2 __ksym;
> -extern const void bpf_fentry_test3 __ksym;
> -extern const void bpf_fentry_test4 __ksym;
> -extern const void bpf_modify_return_test __ksym;
> -extern const void bpf_fentry_test6 __ksym;
> -extern const void bpf_fentry_test7 __ksym;
> +extern int bpf_fentry_test1(int a) __ksym;

hum, the only registered one as kfunc is bpf_fentry_test1, to allow fmodret
also there's bpf_fentry_test9 as kfunc, which AFAICS is not really needed

jirka

[1] 5b481acab4ce bpf: do not rely on ALLOW_ERROR_INJECTION for fmod_ret

> +extern int bpf_fentry_test2(int a, __u64 b) __ksym;
> +extern int bpf_fentry_test3(char a, int b, __u64 c) __ksym;
> +extern int bpf_fentry_test4(void *a, char b, int c, __u64 d) __ksym;
> +extern int bpf_modify_return_test(int a, int *b) __ksym;
> +extern int bpf_fentry_test6(__u64 a, void *b, short c, int d, void *e, __u64 f) __ksym;
> +extern int bpf_fentry_test7(struct bpf_fentry_test_t *arg) __ksym;
>  
>  extern bool CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT __kconfig __weak;
>  
> -- 
> 2.44.0
>