Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-208449-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 11:16:14 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
 Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>, Daniel
 Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
 linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-man@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
 bpf@vger.kernel.org, Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>, Yonghong Song
 <yhs@fb.com>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>, Peter Zijlstra
 <peterz@infradead.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, "Borislav
 Petkov (AMD)" <bp@alien8.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Andy
 Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, "Edgecombe, Rick P"
 <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>, Deepak Gupta <debug@rivosinc.com>, Linus
 Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv7 bpf-next 0/9] uprobe: uretprobe speed up
Message-ID: <20240610111614.1448e721@rorschach.local.home>
In-Reply-To: <CAEf4Bzbc99bwGcmtCa3iekXSvSrxMQzfnTViT5Y-dn8qbvJy7A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20240523121149.575616-1-jolsa@kernel.org>
	<CAEf4Bza-+=04GG7Tg4U4pCQ28Oy_2F_5872EPDsX6X3Y=jhEuw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEf4Bzbc99bwGcmtCa3iekXSvSrxMQzfnTViT5Y-dn8qbvJy7A@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Wed, 5 Jun 2024 09:42:45 -0700
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com> wrote:

> Another ping. It's been two weeks since Jiri posted the last revision
> that got no more feedback to be addressed and everyone seems to be
> happy with it.

Sorry, there's been a lot going on.

> 
> This is an important speed up improvement for uprobe infrastructure in
> general and for BPF ecosystem in particular. "Uprobes are slow" is one
> of the top complaints from production BPF users, and sys_uretprobe
> approach is significantly improving the situation for return uprobes
> (aka uretprobes), potentially enabling new use cases that previously
> could have been too expensive to trace in practice and reducing the
> overhead of the existing ones.
> 
> I'd appreciate the engagement from linux-trace maintainers on this
> patch set. Given it's important for BPF and that a big part of the
> patch set is BPF-based selftests, we'd also be happy to route all this
> through the bpf-next tree (which would actually make logistics for us
> much easier, but that's not the main concern). But regardless of the
> tree, it would be nice to make a decision and go forward with it.

I'll be talking with Masami about this later today.

-- Steve