Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-208640-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.199.223;
From: Elizabeth Figura <zfigura@codeweavers.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
 Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
 wine-devel@winehq.org,
 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9?= Almeida <andrealmeid@igalia.com>,
 Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>, Arkadiusz Hiler <ahiler@codeweavers.com>,
 Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
 linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
 Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
 Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/28] NT synchronization primitive driver
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 11:58:48 -0500
Message-ID: <2325658.ElGaqSPkdT@uriel>
In-Reply-To: <20240519202454.1192826-1-zfigura@codeweavers.com>
References: <20240519202454.1192826-1-zfigura@codeweavers.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

On Sunday, May 19, 2024 3:24:26=E2=80=AFPM CDT Elizabeth Figura wrote:
> This patch series implements a new char misc driver, /dev/ntsync, which is
> used to implement Windows NT synchronization primitives.
>=20
> NT synchronization primitives are unique in that the wait functions both =
are
> vectored, operate on multiple types of object with different behaviour
> (mutex, semaphore, event), and affect the state of the objects they wait
> on. This model is not compatible with existing kernel synchronization
> objects or interfaces, and therefore the ntsync driver implements its own
> wait queues and locking.
>=20
> This patch series is rebased against the "char-misc-next" branch of
> gregkh/char-misc.git.

Hi Peter,

Sorry to bother, but now that the Linux merge window is closed could I
request a review of this revision of the ntsync patch set, please (or a
review from another locking maintainer)?

I believe I've addressed all of the comments from the last review,
except those which would have changed the existing userspace API
(although since the driver isn't really functional yet, maybe this
would have been fine to do anyway?)

Thanks,
Zeb